PC 1960-1961-280! F J ~ ~! ~r .{: ~ ~ -
° ~ ~ ~~ "~ R~y~
$ '' ~ :' r
~ y ~ ~
8 ~y ~ 1 N . ~I .
i. 1 :W
1
i
)
gr
t` ~
~
RBSOLUTIONI NO 280 SHRI~S 1950~61
A RFSQLUTION OF TEffi CITY PIAIu'~dING COPA~(ISSI@i OP T!~ CITY OF ANAFISII[
P.HC~i.~iDING TO TfiS CITY COUNCIL OF Tfffi CITY OP. ANAF~I~! THNT
PBIZITON PQR RHCtA33IPICATION N0. d0-~1-103 BB C~It~WTBD
1~tBA3, the City pianning Commisaion of the Citq of Anaheis did receive a Oerified
Petition for Reclassification from TC~NLHV, INCORPQRATHD, 223 East Manville Street~
Compton, Califarnia, Owner; A. Levinson, 222 East Manville Street~ Compton, California,
Agent, proposing reclassification of the following described property: Lot 8.of Orange Grove
Acres, in the county of Orange, State of California, as per map recorded in book 6, page
42 of Miscellaneous Maps inthe offitie of the county recoraler of said counfiy.
; aa8
1~f~RBA3, the City Planniag Commission did hold a public heariag ~t the ~ity Iiall in
the City of Anaheim on June 12, 1961 at 2:00 o•cloct P.ll., aotice of said
public hearing having been cluly given as required by1aK aad in accordutce trith ghe provi-
sions of the Anaheim Municipal CodeQ Chapter 18.72, co hear aaG coneider epidence for and
against said proposed reclaasification and to iavesti~ate and make fiadings cnc! recoamen-
dations ia connection therewith; ~ad
SV1iSRBA3, said Commission, after due inapec~kion~investigation, aad etu8q nade by it-
self and ia its behalf, and after c,tue consideratinx of all evidence aad r~ports offered
at said heazing, doda find and determine the following facta:
1, That the petitioner proposea a reclassification of the above described pr~~~-
perty fram tIIe R-A~ Residential Agricultuxal, Zone to the P-L, Parking Landscaping, Zone•
and the M-1, Ligh'~ Manufacturiag, Zone.
2. That the proposed reciassification of sub,~e~t proper4y ~_ necesaary ox
des3rabie for the orderly aad proper development of the comaunity.
3, That the propoaed reclassification of eub,~ect property doea properiy
relate to the zonea and their permitted usea locally e~tablished in cAose p=oxiait~ to
subject property aad to the zonea and their permit±ed uses geserally eatabliahed 4hrough-
out the co~nunity. .
4. That ths proposed reciassifieatioa of aub3ect property doea require
dedication for ann atandi:rd improveaeat of abutting atreete becauae said property
does relate to and abut upon atreets and highways which ure roposed to carr~ ths
tqpe and quantity of traffic~ x~hich wiii be generated by the peraitted usea, ia •accord-
ance with the circulation element of the Generai plaa.
5. That the proposed reclaseification :ts in conformance with the projected deveiop-
ment of the northeast industrial area as indicated on the Generai Plan.
6. .That no one appeared in opposition to subject petition,
R-1 -1-
~ , _ ~..-- - .._ ~ - ---,_~~_.__._~__--- ;
~ ~. __ ,_...-----------
,._ __.. ~_. ~ . ~ .
__
_ _--------1 ,
~ ~~ . 1 . . . . ~- . ___.-._....... y
V
'~f ~ yQ ~
~ ~ ~J
NOW, 1HBRSPOItB, BB IT RBSOLVHD that ~the Anaheim City Planning Commission hPreby
recommends to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that Petition for Reclassification !
No. 60°61-103 be approved and, by so doing, that Title 18-Zoning of the Anaheim i
Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above described property from the R-A, Resident!al
Agricultural zone as follows: a strip of land 50 feet in depth, after dedication~ abutting I
and para11e1 to the planned highway right-of-way line on La Palma•Avenue shall''be incorporated ~
-3'~i the"P-L, Parking Landscaping, Zone; and the balaace of said property shall be incorporated '
in t1~e M-1, Ligfit Manufactur~ng, Zone•,-upon the following conditions which are hereby found
to be a necessary prereqieisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve
the safety and general welfare oi the Citizens of Anaheim: ',
1, Dedication of 53 feet from the monumented cen#erTine of I.a Palma Avenue (20 feet existing).
2. Dedication of 60 feet £or a service road alorig the Riverside Preeway.
3, psep~ration of stieet improvemen} plaas for La Palma Avenue and the service road and
the inssallation of all improvements in accordance with approved standardi plans on file
in the office of the City Hngineer at ttie ~3lde df development.
4, Payment of $2.00 per front foot for streeb,li~hting purposes at the time of developcaent for ~
La Palma Avenue and the setvide road, or the iastallation of street lights at the time of 1
development as approved by the Dicector of Public Utilities. 1
S, Provision of utility easements along extesior boundaries as determined by tlie Director ~
of Public Utila.ties. ':~
6. Tima limitation of ninety (9Q) days for iche accomplishment of Item Nos. 1, 2, and 5. :~
7, Brovision qf a Sfty (50) fuot landscaped strip abutting the planned highway righ4-of- ,~
wny line of sub;;ect property, except foz. access drives or walks. Plans for said
~
landscaping and wa~er sypply system shail be subject to the arproval of the Superintendent ~
of Parkway Mai:a~snance. ' :i
,
THS POREC-OII~ RH30LUTION is signed and approved by me this ay of June~ Y961. :1
•~
i
~ j
y
~ ~f
RMAN ANAHHIM CI PIANNING COI~4rIISSION t
i
,
ATTHST:
SE~F~'ARY ANAHB£M CITY PL1N~1iNG CQ'MtTSSION
S A1/'8 OP CALIPORNIA )
COUNTY OP ORANGB ) ss.
CITY OP ANAF~IM )
I, JBAN PAGII. . Secretary of .the City Planning Commission of the City of ;
Anahei.m~ do hereby certify that the foreg~ing resolution was passed and adopted at a #
meeting of the City Piaiming Commission of the City oF Anaheim, held on June 12, 1961 ~
at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYB3: C0~4+fISSIONffitS: Allred, Maxcoux, Morzis, Mungali, Pezry, Summexs. ~
~
NGB3: CC~4AI$SIONFR3: None. 'i
ABSBNT: COA9~1I9SIOHffit3: Ct~aix~aan Gauer, Hapgood.
IN WYTNBS3 WFffitSOP, I have hereunto set my hand this 12th day of June~ 1961.
~ i
t
. ' ~~
a
. ;
&HCRB IM CITY P7A ~ G CONAlI99ION '
!,i~
r~
,,l
~~
R2-A -2-- ~ ~;
RBSOLUTION N0. 28Q "`
-:,;
. :~~3~
._':.~;
_ . _. ~. ,-,;,: , ._
---- ~ - --• --- _ .. _
-:~:i , ~; . - - _ ____
,a;:n •-