PC 1961-1962-113~' ~.. ! ~ :f 1 ~.
~~i .
~' ~?{~ •.~ ~ u •~ .. ~ :~ ~ ~ ~~. . ...
~. ... .. . .. ..... . ... . ~,~ . . ...... .. . . .. . .~ . _i . . .
1j~. . ........ .....,.~ ,'....:r.:-.. -.~... ..~.~ .............. '.......;. ...~.-_.-.=... . ......... .... . .
{!
~~ ~ i R
+ ~j C" -..i ~'.
~.« ~.
RBSOLUTION NO 113, SERIHS 1961-62
A RBSOLUTIOt~I OP TfID CITY PIANNT:'it~ CC4WISSI~I OP TH8 CITlf OP ANAK6IM
RECOI~D~IDING TO Tf~ CITY C:?'JNCIL OF ~ CITI( OP ANAHHIM TAAT
pBTIT!@I POR RSCIASSIPx'ATIOd~I NO 61-62-34 BB APPROVHD
WHBRBA3, the City Planaing Cosmi=c•3on of the C~ity of,Anaheis did recti~e a perifieQ
Petition for Reclassification fron HA.":~ P. RIMB, et al, 2515 Villa Vi3ta Way, Orange,
California, Owner, proposing reclassiitcation of the following described property; Legal
description, Hxhibit "A", on file in the office of the Planning Department
i ~
-._ --::.~
NF~RBAB, th~ City Plenaiag Coaiasion did hold a public Inearia~ st the Cil~ Aall ia
the City of Anaheid oa October 16, ]961, at 2;00 o'cloct P.M., aotice of a~id '
pubiic hesring heving been dulq given as required b=]aM and ia aceerdance rith the pravi-
aioae of the Anaheia Municipal Code~ Chapter 18.72~ to 6eu aad ~aaeider evidence for snd
againat eaid propoeed reclsasificatioa and to iaveatigate and nake findiags tad secoae~ea-
datione ia connectioa therewith; Rnd
NF~RBAS~ asid Commiaaion, after due ianpection,iavestigatioa, and atady ~adrs b~ it-
eeZf and ia ita bettalf, and after due conaideration of all evideace saa seports offexe~
at eaid hearin~, do.s fiad end deLermine the foiloering f~cts;
1. That the petitioner propoees a recl~seific~,tioa of the above deacribed pro-
pe=ty fiom tLC ly[-1, Light 1V(anufacturing, Zone to the C-2, General Commercial,
Z~ne.
2. Thst the Dropoaed reciaesif£cation of aub,~ect property ~._ aecewsr~ or
deairabie foz the orderly aad proper developmeat of the ao~suuity.
3. Thnt the propoaed reclaasi£ic~tion of aub,~ect property doea psoperly
relats to the zonea and their permittr.ld uaea locaily eatabliahed in close proxia~it~ to
aub,~e~~ propertq snd to the zoaee and :~hetr permitt~d uaee `eneraily ea3nbliehed lhrouBh-
out 4he co~unity.
4. That the p=opoaed zeciaosificatioa o~ oub,~ec! propestr doea n~r. sequire
dedication for cnd atandard inproveaent of abuttini etreet~ becaumo said propertr
doee reiate to aad abut upon streete and high~rsya rhich are i mnrnvt?d tA ~urp t2re
tqpe aud quantity of 4raffic. ~ich xiil be geaeratea by the peraitted u~ea~ in •aecard-
aace with the circulation eiemeat of the Gener~i Pita.
5. That no one appeared in opposition to sub~ect petition,
R-1 '1'
-_----- ---~ ._ __ ___ . _. _ .__ _ ___ _ .. .. ___. __.. _. ___ - ---- ~
_. . . _ ~ i . _ . ..._...
5
i ,:~_ ~~
:~ .. . . .
~ .
~~.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Maheim City Planning Commisslon does heceby deny subject
Petltion for Vedence on the besis of the efocementioned findinga.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTJnN is signed end epproved by me this llth day of December , 1961.
~: ..~
~~'
/
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~
ATTFST:
~
SEC ARY ANAHEIM CITY P NING COMMISSION
S TE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORAAIGE ) ss. ' '
CITY OF ANAHEIM j
I, Jean Pege, Secretery of the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim,. do hereby cedify thet the foer
going resolutiou was pessed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on
December 11, 1961 at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote og the membecs theceof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Gauer, Hapgood, Marcoux, Pebley, Pesry, Summers.
NOES: COMMISSIONER~: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Mringall.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hend this llth day of L p::ember, 1961.
>T..~ ~
SEC AItY ANAHEIM CITY PL ING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0. 168
V2-D
-?-
~
I
!
i .
~ .
'- -- _..~~ ;~,~. -- ----- -- f~
, . ~%~'~ ! ~ ~.