PC 1961-1962-182~'
~ •'
,• ~
~~:
~!.
~~
r'
r
~~
~ ~,
~ ~
RESOLUTION NO. 182. SHRIHS 196f-62
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 1435 BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commiasion of the City oE Aneheim did teceive a verified Petition f r Vadence from
RAYMOND 3PEHAR, 1532 Beacon, Anaheim, California, Owner; Robert H. Johnson 1733~ West Lincoln
Avenue,.Anaheim, California, Agent of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim,
County of Orange, State of Califoraia, as described in Hzhibit °'A" or as follows: Lot 139
of Tract No. 2779
; and
WHEREAS, the Ctty Plenning Commission did hold a public headng at the City Hall in the City of Aneheim on.
December 27 1961 at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid publlc heering heving been duly given as cequlred by
lew end in eccor~ence with the provisions of the Aneheim Municipel Code, Chapter 18.68, to hear end consider evidence for
and egainat seid proposed varience end to investigate end meke finding's end recommendatlons in connoction therewith;
aind
WEiEREAS, said Commission, eftec due inspection, investigetion, and study made by itaelf end in its behelf,
end after due consideration of ell evidence and reports offered as seid hearing, does find end deteemine the following
facts:
1. Thet the petitioner requests e varience fmm the Anaheim Municipel Code: Section 18.32.080 (5) to
permit a coverage of sixty-eight (68) percent of the lot area of~sdbject property.
2. That there are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions appli-
cable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply
generally to the property or class of use =n the same vicinity and zone.
3. That the requested variance is not necessary for the preservation and ettjoyment of a
substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, and
denied to the property in question.
4. That the requested variance will be materir'. • detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious to the property or improvement~ 3n such v'..in~;y and z~ne in whick- the property is
located.
5. Th...a,t verbal 4pposition by two owne~r.a of pro~~eri;y ia subject uiea were recorded
against subject petition.
VI-D, -1-
_ 1 '__""____"_"'_.'"'___._..~""""""..._..__._.._...._."'___'"'_~~_.'___"'_'; 4.
.
J~.;
_...."_ "_~ : 1 . ~q '~. .. ~ ... . .. .
I
i
i
:i
;
~~,+
i
`i
1
f
t
t
,}
;~
i
tl;~~~
`x;;
~ t:
~y:}._
r.:
~iF
a't
~'~
~t
li;
F.7
,, ~
~;:
.•`
~: ^
I
~. ~
i~~:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Aaaheim City Plenning Commieeion does heroby deny aubJect
Petition for Varience on the besie of the eforementioned findinge.
i THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me thie 27th day of December, 1961,
(. ,
r'
4 .
~ .
t
f CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMM
; •
r ATTEST: '
~.
t
E
F .
~ SE T RY ANAHEIM CITY PLANN COMMI55ION
S E OF CALIFORNIA )
~ COUNTY OF ORANGE ) sa. ~
~ CITY OF ANAHEIM )
~
f
{ I, Jeen Page, Secretary of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do heroby cedify thet the fora
! going resoluUon was pessed end adopted et a meeting of the City Pleaniag Commission ofthe City of Anehelm, held on
~ December 27, 1961 et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the membets thereof:
~ AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Gauer, Hapgood, Marcoux, Mungall, Pebley, Perry,. Summers.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
F
y, , ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Allred.
r •
€ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereuneo set my hand this 27th day of December, 1961.
;
~ / Rr.
~ SECRET AHEIIYI CITY PLANNIN .,OMh1ISSI0N
~ RESOLUTION N0. 182 ~
. .
V2-D ~ -2.
_._.. ------____°---
------- .M. - :
~ ~ _---. _ . .