PC 1961-1962-47_ `~ ~~~ ~:
RBSOLUTION N0. 47, SERIBS 1961-62
A RHSOLU'PI~I OP THB CITY PIANNIIdG COMMISSIdr1 OF Tfffi CYTY OP ANAHBIM
THAT PSTITION POR VARIANCB NO 1395 BH GRANTBD
h~iffitEAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified
petition for Varistnce from BDWARD R. and HARRIHT B. RICH, 2536 Greenlea£, Anaheim, California,
Owners, R. D. Davis, 1777 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California, Agent
of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, Stute of
California, as described in Exhibit "A" or as follows: Lot 65,Tract 2118. ti;
(i
; an3
Wie~RBA3, the City Planning Coe~mission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in
the City of Anaheia on August 21, 1961 at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said
public hearing having beerd duly given as required by]aw and ia accordaace with the provi- ;
sions of the Anaheim Muaicipal Code, Chapter 18.68, to hear and consider evidence for and
against said proposed variance and to investigate and make findings and recommendations
in connection therewith; and '
iVE~RSAS, said Commission, after due in~pection, i.nvestigation,and s4udy made by it-~
self and in its behalf, and after due consideration of ail evidence and reports offered
as said hearing, does find and determine the followiag facts:
1, That the petitioner requests a variance from the Anaheim Municipal Code:
3ection 18.24.030 (3) to permit an encroachment of twelve (12) feet in the required rear ;s
yard of subject property in order to construct a family room addition to an existing residence. ;
~
2, That there are exceptional or extraordinasy circumstances or conditions ~
applicable to the property invoived or to the intended use of the property that do not
apply generally to the property or ciass of use in the same vic3nity and zone. ~3
3, That the requested variance is necessary for the preservation and en,~oyment
of a 6ubstanYial ,property right possessed try other property in the same vicinitq and :
zone, and denied to the property in question. • ~
4. That the,reqsested variance will not be materially detrimental to the public
welfare or injurious to the property or impronements in such vicinity and zone in wh9.ch ~
the property is located. :,
5. That the requested variance wiil not adversely affect the Comprehensive t
General Pian. ;
6, That no one appeared in opposition to subject petition. '
1
;
i
3
V-1
~~
_.._.~,,,T
. . .. . . .
- ~ ~~ . ~c,"~.
.~
-1-
- ;
...~~-__. . '_`.------; ~------ ~ . _ .._-----•
, ~ ' ;.
~ ~. ~ ` ~ -~ , ~ ~ .'; ,:.~'
..
i ;
,. .
r+~
'~. ,+'
NdW, ~IHRHPORB, 'BE ?T RBSOLVHD that the Anaheim City Planniag Corumiasion hereby
approves Variance No. 1395 , upon the following conditions which
are hereby found ~o be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the aub,~ect pro-
per4y in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizese of Anuheia;
1. Development substantially in lccordance with Hxh;bit No. 1.
Tf~ PORHGOING RBSOIUTION 3s signed and approved by me this 21st day of August, 1961.
'
~
CHA ANAF~IM CITY PIANNING COFAdI83I ~'
AT1B9T: 1
~
:
3S Y APW~IM C TY P G C~lISSIOIV
81'~CTB OP CALI PORNIA ) •
COUNTY OP ORANGB ) ss.
CITY OP ANAHBIM )
I, Jean Page , Secretary of Yhe City Pianaing Comaiesioa of the City of
Anaheim, do hereby certify ttsat tl~e foregoiag resolution vrras passed aad adopted at a
meeting of the City Planning Commission of the Citp of Anaheia, held on August 21, 1961
at 2:00 o~cloct P.M.~ bq the following vute of the ~embers thereof: ~
AYS3: COi~AlI33I~Iffit3: Allred, Gauer, Hapgood, Marcoux, Mungall, Yebley, Summers.
NQB3: CQ~AiI3SI0I~EtS: Nome.
AB9HNT: COMMISSI~IHR3: Morris, Perry.
IN WITNRSS WHEItEOP, I have hereunto set my hand this 21st day of August, 1961.
S Y ANAHSIM CITY P ING COi~dISSI
I VC?rA
Re~~lution No. 47
. .. ,... . t~-`;J
2-
----- - .._..___...._.I
_ _..._ --- w
. . .. -~_. . k
. . ~_ . . ., ~ . . . ..