PC 1961-1962-61
~
,~, _,,,_-_ .
,~;
i . . ,
~. ~ ~
~
: ~'~.
RHSOLUTION N0. ~>> Series 1961-62
A RBSOLUTI04~1 OP 2HH CITY PIANNING COMalx$SI~i OP TF~ CITY OP ANAHBIM .
THAT PBTITION POR VARIANCH N0. 13~9 BE GRANTED
Wf~itBA3~ the-City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a verified
Petition for Variance fsom MARlE SHOOK, 2836 West Lincoln P.venue, Anaheim, Caiifornia, Owner
of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, Count.p of Oraage, State o£
California, as deacribed in Bxhibit "k" or as follows: The East 90 feet of the North 291
feet of the West 6 acres of the North 10 acres of the East 13 acres of the North 18 acres
of the East 30 acres of the Nor•theast quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 13y in
Township 4 South, Range 11 West, in the Rancho Los Coyotes, City of Anaheim, as shown on
a map thereof recorded in book 51, page 11, Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange Ccunty;
EXCEPT the North 66~00 feete
; an~i
WFIHRBA3, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall ia
the City of Anaheim on September ~i, 1961 at 2:00 o~clock P.M., notice of said
public hearing having been duly given as required by]aw and in accordance with the provi-
aions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.68, to hear and consider evidence for and
againat said proposed variance and to investigate r~d mate findAnga and recommendatians
in con.:ection ther!with; and
WFIDItBAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation,and study made by it-
self.and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered
as said hearing, does find and determine the foliowing facts:
1. That the petitioner re~uests a variance from 4he Anaheim Mutticipel Code:
Sectioit 18.~6.010 (1) to permit the utilization of an existing garage attached to an
existing residence ort subject property for an antique shop.
2. That there are exceptionnl or extraordinary circumstancea or conditions
applicable tc the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do aot
apply generaiiy to the property or ciass of uae in the same viciaitq aad zane.
3, That the requeated varinnce is necessary for the preaervation and en,~oqmeat
of a subsLant3al property right posseased by other property in the same viciaity and
zone, and den3ed tu the property in question. •
4. That the requeated variance will not be materialiy detrimental to the public
weifare or inJurious to the property or improvements in auch vicinity and zone ia wh9.ch
the property is located,
~ 5. That the requeated variance will not adversely nffect the Comprehensive
General Ylan.
6. That the petitioner has operated an antique shop on abutting property to the
west: for a number of years and that said operation will be abandoned upon relocation to
subJect property.
7. That no one appeared in t~roosition t~ subject petition.
V-.1 • -1-
":\ 1 ~' 1
~ 1.'=: •: ~ : t .
I .~Y. ~
N F
~ r~: ~~ ~ :~ '~ ~
, ~ ~,
, ~-~ a
~ , . . ~~
NCJW, 17iHRBPORB, BB IT RSS~AB~ that the Anaheim City Planning Commiasion hereby
approves Variance No. 1399 ~ upon the folloxing conditiona which
are hereby found. to be a necessary prerequiaite to the proposed uae of the s~b3ect pro-
perty in order t~ preserve the sufety and general xeifare of the Citizena of Anahcim:
l. Development substantially in sccordance with Exhibit No. l.
2. Limitation of the antique shop operation to the existing garage only, as indicated in
Exhibit No. 1, tor a three (3) year period of time, subject to review if requested
at the termination of said three (3) year period of time.
3. Employment shall be limited to the members of the resident family only.
4. No outdoor storage of materials and/or supplies.
5. Limitation of one (1) advertising sign wich a maximum of four (4) square feet on
subject property. .
6. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improvements fo~
Lincoln Avenue, in accordance with the approved standard plans on file in the office
of the City F'r.o~n~er.
7. Payment of $2.~0 per front foot for street lighting purposPS on Lincoln Avenue.
8. Time limitation'of one hundred eighty (18U) days for the accomplishment of Item Nos.
6 and 7.
....
T~ T+DEtHGOING RBSOLUTiOaJ ia aigt-ed and approved by ae this 6th day of Septmeber, 1961.
AT188T:
~L.v/ ~j(i ,~~
3B Y ANAf~IH CITY P NG COhQ1IS8Idi~f
BTATE OP CALIPORNIA )
COUNTY OP QRANGE ) ae.
CITY OP ANAHEIM )
CHAI ANA}~IM CITY PIANNING C ION
Ir • ,.~EAN PAGE , 9ecretarp of the City Plaaaing Cos~ieeion of !he CiLy of
Anahein, do hereby certifq that the fose~oiag reaolution was paesed sad sdopted at a
~eeting of the City Plaanin; Co~isaion of th~e City df Aaaheia, l~eid oa September 6, 1961,
at 2:00 o'clock P.M.~ by the followiag vote of the aesbera thereo¢s
A~° ~IgsI~~g~ Allred, Gauer, Marcoux, Mungall, Pebley, Perry, Summers.
NOB3: CUhOdI3SI~I~R3: None.
~B3B1'1Te QOAAII3SI~1ffit3: • Napgood, Morri s.
TN NITN8,Q3 1~fiF1t8~P, 'I have hereunto aet my hand thi s 6th day of September, 1961 .
VC7rA _~_
Resolution No. bl
Y ANAFI8I1d CITY P ING COIQiI83I~1