PC 1961-1962-9~ j (~i.
I :~~ ~~'
I t
J
,~ ~
{..~
C~
:~
RBSOLUTION NO 9„ SERIES_1961-62 1
'~-` A RBSOLUTI~I QP THB CITY PIANNING C01~0[ISSIOFi OP ~ CITY •OP f-NAHSIII
~~
~' ABCq~WBNDIiVG TO Tf~ CITY CdUIVCIL OP ~ CITY OP ANA}~BIAI THAT
'-°` PBTIITON FOR RHCIA38IPICATIOi~i~ N0: 61-62-1 BB APPROVED
~a'~' AiF]~tBAg, the City Plaaaing Commiesioa of the Citq of Anahei8 did Teeei9e a~eri£ied
' 'tf!` petitioa for Reclasaifi~at9.oa from VICTOR B. SAYRH, 530 Via Lido Nord, Newport Beach,
,y,j °='= California, Owner; Pacific Southwest Realty Compaay,.P. 0. Box 2097, Terminal A:u-ex,
~ Los Angeles 54, California, Agent, proposing reclassifitation of the foliowing described
4
r;~ property: Lot 12 of Tract No. 3258, in.the City of Anaheim, County+~of Orange, State of
a;
5:' I California, as per map recorded in book 99, pages 19 and 20 of Miscellaneous Maps, in the
;`" office of the county recorder• of said county.
i ~
Wl~RBpB, the Citq Pianning Co~is~ior. did hold o pulilic heariag at ~he City Hali ia
the City of Anaheim on July`10, 1961 ' at 2:00 o~c3oct P.~.~ no4lce of said
publi'c hearing having been duly given a~ ,.equirecl by ~p and ~tt accordaace xith , the provi-
aiona of the Aaaheim Mu~cipal Code, Chapter 18.72, to hear ond considxr•evideace for aad
againat said proposed reclassification and to inveatigate and aste fiadinga and recomaea-
dationa ia ca-,nection therewith; and
~IFffitBAg~ said Com~aieaion~ sfter due iaspectio~;?.>:,veatigatioa, snd etu8y wnde by it-
aeif and ia i4a behalf, end aftes du~ consideratioa of~sil evideace taC reporta offer~ad
Q~ said heariag~ doea find aad determine the foilowl.ng facta:
1. ~fiat the pet~tioner propo~ea~ a reclaesification of the aboee dsacribed pro-
perty from tIIe R-A, Residential Agricultural,~ Zone to the C-1, Neighborhood Commercial,
Zone.
2. Thmt the propoeed reciaeaific~tion of aub,~ect propes~y ~._ aecesear~ or
deairabia fos the orderiy snd proper developmen4 08 the coawaity.' • .
3. That the propcrsed recl4seifics4~.on of eub,~eot property dae~ F~~-per1P
relate to the zonea and their pernitted ueza localiq establiehed ia•closs pr.ozi~i.@r t~
aub,~ect property es-d t~ tbe zoaes and their permit4ed uaes geaeraliy eatabl3shed tt~rough-
otat tha co~uni4y. ~
4. That the prop~sed reeiaeei£~cstiose nf aub,~ect property doea requise
dedication for and atandard impzoveaen~ of sbattiag atreeta becawe eaid proparty
oea reinte to and rbut upoa etreeta aad highrraya r,hi.ch ~re uroposed !o cass~•the
tqpe ~ad quantity o8 tr4ffic, which vriii be generated by the peraitted uses~ .in •oe~ardt-
nsce with the circalatio~ element of the G~aerni Piea. •
5. That no one appeared in opposition to subject petition.
R-1
-!-
- `.,;;:
_ __
_~.~~-.- ---~.__..~.__.____.. ..,~
- -- ---
- - : _.~ ~_. _ ____...._.,- ,
. , ~ ' , _ . . . . . _ _____ .. r
. . ..._._ . . .~3~ ~ ~ . . . . . . . . . , . _ .., . .. . ,.
i
~
:~ ; --
:~:
~
~
~ .
,..
AYB3: COM~-tISSIONBRS: qllred, Morris, N~ungall, Pebleq, Yerzy, Summers,
N~: CObAlISSIONffit3: None.
ABSBNT: ~OAfl~(Ig3I~Nffitg: Gauer, Hapgood, Marcoux.
IN WITNB33 WFffiRHOP, I have h~reunto aet my hand this lOth day of July, 1961.
SHQtB '~ ANAHHIM CITY P C~FAlI9310N
~; R2~A '2'- i
f
~; RB90LUTION N0. 9 i
,.:
}
.~.. _` __ _
~ - -- . i
--~-------__-__---__.-____~.~.-° . ---, - , --- -~
_ . aK.r; , ' ,
-..,,.„, ~
,.,:,,... ._ , . _
_ _ ?~ . i, . ~...
.--_.._ _ _ ...................._.,n.,.~.M......~.,....,.v.~r,s~.o~o.rn:z.._..._r:h:''_..-:f~....,_...._:..,.....,..-
r{t'
l . ~
~
NON1,_ 1HEREPORE, BB IT RESOLVIiD ',•.hat the Anaheim City Planning Commission hereby
recommends to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that Petition for Reclassification
No. 61-62-1 be approved and, by so doing, that Tit1e 18-2oning of the f~naheim
Municipal Code be aa~ended to exclude the above described property from the.P,-A, Residential
pgricultural zone and to incorporate $aid described property in the C-1, Neighborhood
Commercial zone, upon the following conditions which are hereby found fo be a neces-
sary prerequiszte to the pronosed use of the subject property in order to preserve the
safety and general welfare of the Citizens of Anaheim;
1. Development substantially in ac~ordance with plans presented.
2. Subject to the aE~prova~ of Petitibn for Variance No. 1376.
3. Payment of $2.00 p~ar front foot for street lighting purposes on Katella Avenue and
Humor Drive.
4. Compliance with the approved standard plans on file in the office of the City Bngineer for•:~~
the in'stalla'tion i+f ariveorays.
5. Tim? limitation o£ ninety'(90) days for the accomplishment of Item Nos. 3 and 4. ,
6. Provision of landscaping in accordance with plans presented, said landscaping
to be submitted to and approved by the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance.
Tf~ PQRHGOZNG RBSOLUTION is sigued and approved by me this YOtri day of July, 1961.
.
ICB IRM11N ANAHS CITY PIANNING CQAlMIS5ION
ATTB3T:
Y CQ~9d 5~ EON
OP ORAN(~3 ) 8s.
CITY OP ANAHgIM )
~i~
SB t ANAtIBIM CI' p 1 V~G-~
STA B P CALIFORNIA )
COUN
I+ JF~.u PAG$ , Secretary of the City Planning Cnmmiasion of the City of
Anaheim, do hereby certi¢y that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a
meeting of the Ci4y Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on July 10, 1961
at 2;00 o~clock P.M., by the foilowing vote of the member+~ thereof: