PC 1961-1962-192~ ---- I
l ~I~~ `•, •V ~ ' '~1 !t •t
, ~.a ~ ~- ~ ':~? .:~ ~
~
~ ~ ~, ~.c:
. ~~
i ~
' RESOLUTION NO. 192, SHRIBS 1961-62
'9
A P.ESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF TEiE CITY OF ANAHEIh'I
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFiCATION NO. ~+~- -57 BF. APPROVED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim did receiee a verified Petition for Recles'sifica-
tionfrom BALL-BROOI{HURST COARAL, COMPANY, 1214 South Brookhurst Street, Anaheim, California,
Owner; Gail Guthrie, 2235 Coronet, Anaheim, California, Agent; pzoposing reclassification
of the following described property; The westerly 180.00 feet of the northerly 173,00 feet
of Lot 1 of Tsact No. 162 as shown on a map 4hereof recorded in Book 12, page 6 of Miscell-
aneous Maps, records of Orange County, California, said distances being measured along the
northerly and westerly lin2s of said Lot 1, and said lot lines being 30.00 feet southerly of,
and 30.00 feet easterly of the centerlines of Ball Road and Biookhurst Street, respectively
; and
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Heli in the City of Aneheim on
January 8, 1962 at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice oE said public hearing having been duly given as required •by
latv and in eccocdance with the pro~~isions of the Meheim Municipel Code, Chepter 18.72, to hear nnd consider evidence
for and egeinst seid pfoposed reclassification and to invesligate snd meke findings and cecom~mendetions in connection
therewith; and .
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, end study mede by itself end in its behalf, and
a$er due considecation of all evidence and reports offered at seid hearing, does find and dete~mine tha following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes e reclessification of the ebove described properry from the C-1, NSIGHBORHOOD
COMMHRCIAL, 20NH to the C-3, HBAVY COMMHRCIAL, ZONS (limited to Service Station use only).
2. That the proposed ceclassificetion of subject propecty is necessery end/or desirable for the orderly and pra
per develapment of the corcmunity.
3. Thet the proposed ceclessificetion of subject property does properly relete to the zones end their pemiitted
usea locally established in close proximity to subject property and to ihe zones and their permitted uses Renereliy esteb-
lished throughout the conimunity. •
4. That the F~roposed reclassification of subject property does not require dedication
for and standard i~nprovement of abutting streetis because said property does relate to and
abut upon streets and highways which are improved to carry the type and quantity of traffic,
which will be generated by the permitted uses, in accordance with the circulation element.of
the General Plan. ~
5. That compliance with Code, Section 18.40.030 for the ~rovision of the required
amount of parking. area for the Ball-Brookhurst Corral Shopping Center will require the
revision of the piesent pasking area layout of said ~roperty.
6. That vexbal opposition by two tenants in the Ball--Brookhurst Corral Shopping Center,
in addition to one letter of protest, was recorded against subject petition. A statement
of support signed by twelve tenants was recorded in favor of subject petition.
f ` ~ !
'~~~~~6,~',
~, ~ ~
~
~~
f~t ~
~_~ ~,)
'J NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Anaheim City Plenning Commission does hereby cecommend
to the City Council of the City of Aneheim that subject Petitiort for Reclassification be approved end, by so doing,
that Title 18-Zoning oE the AnaheiR Municipal Code be amended to exclude the ebove deacribed property from the
1. Development substantiall.y in accordance with Bxhibit Nos. 1 and 2 with the architecture
of the proposed service stairion conforming with the existing Ball-Brookhu~st Corral
Shopping Center.
2. Recordation oi C-3, HBAYY COMMHRCIAL, ZO:VB.deed restrictions limiting the use of
subject property to service station use c+nly.
3, Time limitation of one hundred eight~y (180) days for the accomplishment of Item No. 2,
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and epproved by me this 8th day of Januar~, 1962.
ATTEST:
~
SEC Y ANAHEIM CITY PLA ING COMMISSION
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSI
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY CF OR,~NGE ) ss. ,
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Jean Page, Secretery of the City Plentting Commission of the City of Anehein;, do heceby certify that the fore-
going resolution wes pessed and edopted at a meeting of the City Plenning Commission of the ~ity of Anaheim, held on
Januarp 8, .196~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Gauer, Hapgood, Marcoux, Mungail, Pebley, Perry,
Summers.
NOES: COh!MISSIONERS: None,
~1BSENT: COMMIS;~IONERS: None,
E ~
~
`
~ ~.
+. 1
~
~
,, RESOLUTION NO. 192
~ {
. j
3
i
SECRETAR NAHEIM CITY P'LAN G COMMISSION
-2- i
a
~
~
,
_._._..---.
_
;^_~_. __.r_ __..__
~
~=
..__ _ __ .
,
_ _ .
.
..
~
IN WITNESS PJHEREOF, I have heceunto set my nend this 8th day of January, 1962.