PC 1961-1962-196il u ~I~~ ,
I~ ` ~I ~I i '
~ '~~
] .~
,:~ .. ~. _ i
3~
RESOLUTfON NO. ~ 9~+ GARIES 1961-62
A RESOLUTIOPT OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF AATAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 19~BE DENIED
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commiesion of the City of Anaheim did receive e verified Petition for Conditional i
Use Pemiitfrom JOHN S. iti'RIGHT, 1620 South Buclid Avenue, Anaheim, California, Owner of certain
real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of Califosnia, as
described in Bxhibit "A" c~r as follows: Lots 5 and 6 of Block 12 of the Fairview Colony
1Yact, and further described as: 1620 South Huclid Avenue i
; and
WHERF.AS, the City Planning Commission did hold s public hearing et the City Hull in the City of Aneheim on
January 8, 1962 at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing having beep duly given as :equiced by
law and in eccocdance with the provisians of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chepter 18:64, to hear and consider evidence
for end against said proposed conditionel use and to investigete and make findings and recommendations in connection
thecewith; end
WHEREAS, seid Commisslon, efter due inspection, investigation, and study mede by itself end in its behelf,
and eher due conside:etion of ell evidence and reports ofEered at said hearing, does find end determine the following fects:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a Conditlonal Use Peimit is authorized by this Code, to wit:
a trailer park.
2, That the proposed use will adversely affect the adjoin3ng land use and the growth
and ::evelopment of the area in which it is proposed to be located,
3. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the conditibns 3mposed, if
any~ wiil be detrimental to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens
of the City of Anaheim.
4, That the development of subject property is more suited for R-1, One Family
Residential, development because of the single family residential development in the
surrounding area. '
5. That verbal opposition by one owner of property in subject area, in addition to a
petition of protest containing 265 signatures, was recorded against subject petition.
Cl-D -1-
.. ----- - ~_ __ -----. . -
.. _.,:,,- ~-----•-- ------------ .--_ ,.
,_.. _ -
- ... ~ ___ ...
. ~ . ~,
_ - 9 ~ . .
~.
;. L
, f ~ ~ ~ ;.,~ ~: ~ ', '
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Anaheim City Plenning Commission does hereby deny subject
PetitIon for Conditional Use Permit on the besis of the aforementioned findings.
TFiE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me.this 8th day of January, 1962.
ATTEST:
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSIO
~
SECRET ANAHEIM CITY PLANN COMMISSfON
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ~ ,
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Jean Page, Secre~;ry of the City Plenning Commission of the Ciry of Aneheim, do hereby certi£y that the fore-
going iesolution was pessed end adopted at o meeting of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim, held on
January 8, 1962 , at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Gauer, Hapgood, Marcoux, Mungall, Pebley, Perry,
Summers.
NOES: COMMISSIOftERS: None,
'ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None,
1N WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 8th day of January, 1962.
SECRET ANAHEIM CITY PLA G COMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0. 196
C2-D _~
_ - ~ . 1 ~ .. ~~__.._. _.._ - - --- - • ~