PC 1961-1962-206.. ' ;..,-,.-...ri,en•'f '.,r.... '. . .
~ : 1.:?......_. ~~..... .._. _~ . :~.~...- ...'. ".^~.. ~. .,..,~.::~: . ~~ ~ ~ ` .. ...... .a.....~~~_._. .. .... _ " _ ........_._ .. . . . _.
w !~ ~.
' • RESOLUTION NO. 206. SBRTES 1961-62 ,
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL uF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62•-64 gE APPROVED
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim did ceceive a~. .,i~d ~etition foc Reclassifica-
tionfrom NI1`Z and MUELLHR, a partnership, 918 West Cente.^ Street, Anaheim, California, Owners
proposing reclassification of the follov~ing described ~roperty: Lot No. 105, Tract No. 1453,
and further described as 625 gouth Harbor Boulevard
; and
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
January 22, 1962 at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of seid public hearing having been duly given ae cequired •by
lew and in,accocdance with the provisions of the Maheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.72, to hearand considee evidence
far and egainst said pioposed :eclassification end to investigate end make findings end eecommendations in connection
therewith; and •
WHEREAS, said Commission, aEter due inspectlon, investigation, and study mede hy itself and in its behelf, and
efter due consideration of ell evidence and reports offered at said hearing, doe= find end determine the fol'.owing . facts: '
1. That the petitioner proposes a reclassificetion of the ebove described property from the R~l, ONH FAMILY
RHSIDHNTIAL, 20NB to the C-1, NBIGHBORHOOD CQMMBRCIAL, ZONB limited to business and pro~
fessional office use only. '
2. That the proposed reclassificetion of subject property is necessary and/or desiceble [or the o:derly end pco-
per development of the community.
3. Thet the proposed ceclassification of subject property does properly celate to the zones end their permitted
uses locelly esteblished in close pcoximity to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally estab-
lished throughout the community. '
4. That the proposed rec~.assification of subject property does require dedication
for and, standard impxovement of abutting streets because said property does relate to and
abut upon streets and highways which are proposed to ca=ry the type and quantity of traffic,
which will be generated by the permitted uses, in accordance with the circulation element of
the General Plan. ' '
5. That no one appeared in opposition to subject petition.
Rl-A -1-
. .,..._ . .._______.___.__..... .
. _ - - ---~ ----- ..o~~.......
.,•., . ~, ;
. - ~~~ ~ ~ __ - --..__..
• ~
~ ;` , ~:
~ o ~ '~ ~ ~ ~` ~~~
~ `-' ~ ~ • j
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Anaheim City Planning Commiasion does hereby cecommend !
to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that subject Petition for Reclassificatfon be appmved and, by so doing,
that Title 1&Zoning of the Aneheim Municipal Code be amended to exclude the ebove described property from the ~
R-1, ONS PAMTLY RBSTDBNTfAL, ZONE and to incorporate said described property in the C-1, ~
NAIGHBORHOOD COhASHRCIAL, ZONB, limited to buainess and professional office use only, upon ,
the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the pYO-
posed use of the subjec4 property in order to preserve the saf.etv and generai welfare of the
Citizens of Anaheim:
1. Removal of existing residential structuzes or development to commercial standards of the
ex3sting buildings, and i.n either case, final buildirig plans, including elevation plans,
to be submitted to the City Council for approval. .
2, Installation of a minimum six (6) foot vtide landscaped strip abutting the front propeity ~
iines of sabject property, plans for said landscaping to be submitted to aad subject to .
the approva], of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance, and said landscaping to be in-
stallecl prior to Pinal Building Inspectiori.
3, posting of a two~year bond to insure the installatbn of a s3x (6) foot masonry t~rali along
' th~ southezly boundary line of sub,jec# property where spbject psoperty a3u#s property
cla~s3f3Ed in 2he R=i, (?ne Pamily.Residential, Zone.
4. Maintenance of a fifty (50) foot buiiding setback from the westerly boundary of the alley
for any two-story construction on subject property and further, #hat no wfndows shall be
in~talled at the rear o£ the second story of said two-story atructurea.
5, Limitation th~.t any signs, other than uniighted signs having a maximum area of eight t8) !
sauare feet, shall be submitted to the City Council for approval, i
6. Recosdation o£ deed restrictions by the owners of subject property limiting the use of '
said property to busiaess and professional offices only, i
7. Provisian of off-st.reet parlcing facilities in accordance with Code requirements prior to !
Finai Building Inspection. ~
8. $~t~~q~~~qn of forty-five (45) feet from the monumented centerline of HarUor Bl~rd.(34.75 feeti
9, ~sro ib} ion af the uae of any residentiai strueture for commercial or combined resi~ ~~
dential and comme•rciai use unless remodeled to commercial standards. . i
10. Dedication of seven (?) feet a't.the.:.rear,.of'sub,~ect yroperty for alley widening and for the ',
establishment of one-way traffic, temporarily, untii such time as all dedication along the
alley has been receive3.
11. Dedication to the City of Anaheim of ail vehicular accesa rights from sub,~ect property to i
Harbor Houlevazd. ~
12, Improvement of the alley to comtderciai staadarda as.required by,the C3ty or the posting of
cash or securitq deposit on a cash face value in thm amount requi=ed for said improvements, +:
prior to P3na1 Huilding Inspection,~ ' ,
13, Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment of~Item Nos. 3, 8,
10, and 11.
THB FOREGOING RHSOLUTION is signed a:td approved by me this 22nd Qay ~f January, 1962.
A ~ / _ CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY P IH CQyMIS3I0N
' ~ . ' ,t i~/
-S ' . Y ANAHfiTM CI'fY. LANNING COMh1ISSTON
~a .OF CALIFQRIVIA )
~UNTY OP ORANGfi . ) as.
CITY OP ANA~IM ) ,
I, Jean Pege, Secretery of the City Planning Commiseion of the City of Aneheim, do hereby certiEy thet the fore-
going resolution was passed and edopted~at a meeting of the City Planning Commiasion of the City of Anaheim, held on
January =.=' , 1962 et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Alired, Gauer, Hapgood, Marcoux, Mungail, Pebley and Perry.
NOES: COMMTSSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Summers.
IN WITNFSS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hend thia 22ad day of January, 1962.
. .C.dl.~t// V
SECRE Y ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIN 'OMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0.206 '
R2-A
_2.
~ n. _
_..
. _ ......: ...... .. ~,
_.
i ._ .. _._ _ _ .
_,... 2