PC 1961-1962-208~ `~. ~~:
;
,~; -
l, ~ { •
~' ` _ t__ ~
RESOLUTION NO. 208. SHRIEiS 1961-62
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COINMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEiM
TfiAT PETITION FOR VARIANCF NO. 1442 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commisaton of the City of Aneheim did receive a vedfied Petition for Varience
from MILDRBD M. HAMMffitMAN, 4755 Rdbertson Bouledard, Beyerly Hills, California, Owner;
David S. Collins, A077 West Ball Rdad, Anaheim, California, Ageht of certain real property
situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of Califoznia, as described in
Hxhibit "A" or as follows: The southerly 3~ inches of Lot S6 and Lot 57, excepting the
easterly rectangula~[ 2 inches of the northerly rectangular 20 feet o£ Lot 57, and all of
Lots 58, 65 and 66 in Block B of Heimann & George~s Map of Addition Building-Lots, as shown
on a map recorded in Book 2, Page 249, Miscellaneous Records of Los Angeles County, Caiifornia
; anc
WHEREAS, the Clty Planning Commission did hold a public headng et the City Hall in the Ciry oE Aneheim
on January 22, 1962 at 2:00 o'clock P.M., ::otice oE said public heering having been duly given es requiced
by law end in accordance with the provisione oE the Maheim Municipel Code, Chepter 18.68,to heac and considet
evidence for end ageinst said proposed vacience and to investigete and meke ffndings end recommendettons in connec
tion thereaith; and
WHEREAS, said Commisalon, after due inspectlon, investigation, aad study mede by itself end in its behalf,
and efter due consideratlon of all evidence and ceports offered es said headng, does find and detecmine the following
facta:
1. Thet the petitioner requesta e variance from the Aneheim Municipel Code: Section 18.44.010 Which
stipulates permitted uses in tk~e C-2, General Commercial, Zone, to permit the use of an
existing building on the subject property for light manufacturing and sub-contracting
activities including electronic assembly, metal working, and packaging and allied fields,
using the elderly and physically handicapped as employees.
2. Thet there ere exceptional or extreordinary clrcumstences or conditions eppliceble to the property involved
or to t}~e intended use of the propedy that do not epply geneielly to the propecty or cless of uae in the same vicinity
and zone.
3. Thet the requested varience is necessery fot the preservation and enjoyment of a substentlal pmpedy rt~ht
posses~ed by other property in the seme vicinity end z~ne, and denied to the property in question.
4. Thet the requested verience will not be meterially detrimentel to the public welfete or injudous to the pmp-
e~ty or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the propedy is located.
• $, That'no one'appe2red in oppo§ition to sub,jeci p~tit'ion.
Vl-G
' -1-
. ..
_. _,. _ _ . _.i _
!iy~ -----~, - -- ------- -~ . . _ . _ .._ _ _ .
, • F¢ .
', l
r
~= ~ :: ~ =~ : `~
; ------
~ ~~
.,
~.
.i
~.>
:~OtCr', Ti'EREFOR.'3, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Aneheim City Plenning Commission does hereby gcant subject ;
p,r~.,pn .<.ot Varfan.^.e, upon the following ~onditions which are heceby found to be a necessary precequisite to the pro-
pos~,i ~se ~f the su~;e~! propecty in otdet to pceserve the safety end generel welfare of the Citizens of the City of ~
F.nehei~.
~ D.:ve1,5~ment substantially in accordance with Sxhibit No. I.
2, Frohiox2ion of any ust resulting in the omission of odor, dust, smoke, gas, noise or
a:~y obnoxious or offensive physical characteristxcs.
. Repa~r o: sidewalxs and curbs on Clautiina Street in accordance with the adopted
standard plans on file in the Office of the'City Shgineer.
4. Removal of trees on Claudina Street if it is determined to be necessary by the
5iaperintendent of Parkway Maintenance,
5. Removal and re-construction of the sub-standard and hazardous driveways on Claudina
3treet in accordance with the adopted standard plaas on file in the Office of the City
Hngineer.
6. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Claudina Street.
7. Time limitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment of Item
Nos. 3, 4, S, and 6.
;HE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end epproved by me thia 22nd day of January, 1962.
ATT ~ST:
~/~f~t/~~ .!' ~-~l/
SE ARY ANAHEIM CITY~,Y.ANNING COMMISSION
v
S ATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CTfY OF ANAHEIM )
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMIS
I, Jean Page, Seaetary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Aaeheim, do hereby ce-tify thet the fore-
going resolution wes pessed end edopted at e meeting of the City Plenning C~mmission of the City of Aneheim, held on
January 22, 1962 at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the membeca theceof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Alired, Gauer, Hapgood, Marcoux, Mungall, Pebley, and Perry.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None .
ABSENT: COKMISSIONERS: Summers.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have heceunto aet my hend this 22nd day of January, 1982.
RESOLUTION NO. 208
V2-G
. ~
SEC ~ARY ANAHEIM CITY P ING COMMISSION
-2-
_ __......
_ _ . --- ------~- --. . ---- ----- --- _ . __
~ --- ------ .
i .. _ . . .. . .
:%~~ . ._
~ ~