PC 1961-1962-228- - - {--,- -
~ ,~ .° ~ .
~1~~-~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' .
~..~.µ.c.~~.~.~ .~~~ ~.r~,}r~.~r . ,~:,.~~.... . _ ,. -
.....,.~«.>M,z...~+ -~..,~.,..,...~......,..s.....~.........,~.....~...,~~..... . , . ,... ....... ,.... . ._. _. .._ . ... ~,e
. . . f'~', . ,,,$
~ 228. SHRIHS 1961-62 ~ ~t
'~ ~ ~ RESOLUTION NO..., :;
• ;
. . ~,
A RESOLUTION OF THE CTfY PLANNINC COMMISSION Or' THE CITY OF ANAHEII~! ~
RECOINMENDING TO THE C1TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIId THAT
~ PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. ~.(L-76 BE APPROVED
. . . ;
NHI:REAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Aaaheim did receive e vedfled Petiti~a foi Recles'siflce- .~~
tion froei ARTHUR R. BUDD, 1019 Irorth Ferndale, Pullerton, Califoraia, Q+imer; proposing :
reclassification of the following described property: Lot Nos. 140, 141, 142, 1.43, 144, +
. ;
and 145 of Tract No. 2779 , `
. i
„ ~
d.
. i
. ~
; and
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commissioa did ~old e public heering et the City Hell in the City of Mehelm on ~
Pebruary 5, 1962 at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of seid publir, hsedng heviag been duly givm as cequiced ~by ;
lew end ia eccordeace with the peovisions of fhe Aneheirti Municipel Code, Chepter 18.72, to heei end coneidec evideace ;
for end againat aeid ptoposed recleaeiEicetion end to investigete and meke findiags a~nd recommendatlons ia connectlon
thecewith; aad . . i
WHEREAS, aeid Commission, aEter due inepection, investigatlon, ead atudy made by itaelf ead in ite behelE, and
+
aRer due consideceHon of all evidence and repoets ofEend et said heedng, doea find end ddecmine the folloaing fects: ' ~
~
1. That t6e petitioner p~oposes a reclessiflcation of the ebove deacdbed propeety from the R-3, MULT I PLE ~
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, ZONE to the C-l, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL, ZONE (restricted to Business ~
and Professionat Offices only). .
2 Thet the peoposed reclasaificetion of aubjeet propeety is aeceessry end/or deslrable tor the orderly end pro-
per development uf the community.
3. That the ~proposed reclaseiflcation of aubject propecry doea pmperly celnle to the zones ead~ their pem~itted
uses locally esteblished in cloae prozimity to aubJect pmperty end to the zones aad their permitted usea generelly estab-
liehed throughout the community. '
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does require dedication
for abutting streer_s because said property does relate to and abut upon streets and highways
which are proposed to carry the type and quantity. of traffic, which.will be generated by the
permitted uses, in accordance with the circulation element of the General Plan.
5. That no one apPeared in opposition to subject petition.
R1-A "1'
C
,
~
;
~
;
2 ~
~~ ;~~~ 7
:i _ _
~ •.w.n.~r~+~~.~.r~...u.n..w.~..r.+~~~ma+~rma.iac~ri.wwr.rn~r.~ne~u..u.aNV.-~..r1a ~. ~ .. .i..~ iLS..~:~':~LI`TVY.Y.:.^.1-l.L^.c:l.).K'Vr>a.12++~v_+..hx_..r- a4M_ ,Sf~'.w4 '':> ..._~.._,u .~..+ ...r.... ~.1 , .. . -..
?~t ~
^~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RE"~O'j.VED that the Maheim Citv Plennine C~mission does hecebv recommend
to the City Council of the City of Anaheim ffiet subject Petition for ,~eciassi$catioa be appmved and, by so doing,
that TiBe 1&Zoning of the Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to'exclude the ebove deacribed pmperty from the
R-3, MULTIPLE FAMILY RESiDENT1AL, ZONE and to.incorporate said described property in the
C-1, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL, ZONE (restricted to Business and Professional Offices only)
upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the
proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general weifare of
the citizens of Anaheim;
1. Development substantia)1 in accordance with ExhiSit Nos. 1 and 2.
2. Installation of a six (6~ foot landscape~ strip alang the planned highway right-of-way
Zine of Euclid Avenue, pians for said landscaping to be submitted to and subject to the
approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance, prior to Finai Building Inspection.
3• Recordation of standard C-l, Neighborhood Commercial, Zone Deed Restrictions liniting u~e
of subject property to medical and dental offices only and restricting maximum height to
one story.
4. Dedication of vehicular accass rights along Euciid and Chalet Avenues with continuance
~ of access r,ights to the public alley.
5. Use of existing structure on subject property to be subject to the approval of the Chief
Building Inspector. ,
6. Dedication of 53 feet from the monumented certterline of Euclid Avenue (50 feet existing).
7. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public Works,
Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size, accessibl'e to trash-truck pick-up, and
adequately enctosed by a solid fence or wall, prior to Final Building Inspection.
8. Time timitation of one hundred eighty (180) days for the accomplishment of Item Nos.
3, 4, and 6.
THE FOREGOING RESOLtJTION is signed ond approved by me this 5th day of Pebraary, 1962.
. CHAII2MAN ANAHEIM CITY PLAIQNIDTG COMMISSI
ATTEST:
SECR RY ANAHEIM CITY PL ING COMMISSION
S E OF CALIFORNIA ) •
COUNTY CF OR~INGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Jean Pege, Seccetary of the City Planning Comroission of the City of Meheim, do hereby cettify thet the fore-
going resolution was pa~sed and adopted et n meeting of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim, held on
February 5, 1962 at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the membecs there~f;
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp. Chavos, Gauer, Hapgood, Marcoux, Mungall,
Pebley, Perry.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None.
IN WITNESS WHEZEOF, i have here~nto set my hend thia Stc day of Pebruary, ~962.
. i~~~
SECRET~ ANAHEIM CITY PLAN G COMMISSION
RESOLUTIOF NO. 22$ ' U
R2-A
-2-
-_ _ . _ __._ _ _ _---. _ _ . _ _
_.._ _
_ _ _,
~ . ~ '
_ .____-_-___...._.._.~~.~_~.~~__Y~ _.~ _ _ ...,~. ..~.. _~
_ .___..
: _.: . .. ...:, - • •
_ ~ ~ ~ ~.