PC 1961-1962-233;~ ~ :~ ~a
~
~
.,
_ K
RESOLUTION N0. 233, SERIES 1961-62
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
FORWARDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM PETITION FOR
RECLASSIFICATION N0. 61-62-63 WITHOUT RECOMMENDATION.
WHEREAS~ THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE C~TY OF ANAHEIM DID RECEIVE A
VER~FIED PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION FROM FRANCIS W. AND MARGARET D. ELLICTT, 542 ~
SOUTH WEST STREET~ ANAHEIMt CALIFORNIA~ OWNERS~ LEO J. FRIIS, TALT a MncMAHON~ 403 ~
CALIFORNIA BANY. BUILDING~ ANAHEIM~ CALIFORNIA~ AGENTS~ PROPOSING AMENDMENT OF"~OROINANCE ,
N0: 963'wHicH RECLASSIFIED THE,FOLLOWING DESCR.IBED PROPERTIES:
LOT ~05. 3 AND 4~ TRACT N0. 2481; AND ~
WHEREQS~ THE C~TY PLANNING COMMISSION DID HOLD PUBLIC HEARINGS AT THE CITY .
~~~~~.L IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ON JANUARY 8n 1962~ FEBRUARY 5~ 1962 AND FEBRUARY 19~ 1962
A7 2:00 O~CLOCK P.M.~ NOTICE OF SAID pUBLIC HEARiNGS HAVING BEEN DULY GIVEN AS REQU~RED
BY LAW AND ~N ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS 0: THE P~NAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE~ CHAPTER 18.72~
TO HEAR AND CONSIDER EVIDENCE FOR AND AGAINST 5.41D PROPOSED RECLASSIFICATION AND TO ~
INVtSTIGATE AND MAKE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH~ AND
WHEREAS. SAID COMM~SSIONy AFTER DUE INSPECTION' INVESTIGATIONo AND STUDY MADE
BY ITSELF AND IN ITS BEHALF~ AND AFTER DUE CONS~DERA710N OF ALL EVIDENCE AND REPORTS OFFER-
ED AT SAID HEARINGS~ DOES FIND AND DETERMINE THE FOLLOWING FACTS:
1. THAT THE PETITIONER PROPOSES AN AMENDMENT OF~ORDINANCE N0. 963,wHicH RECLA55- .
IFIED THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY FROM THE R-A~ RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL~ ZOKE T,0 THE,C-1~ ,
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL~ ZONE; BY THE ELIMINATION OF CONDITION ~~OS. 1 AND 3. OF SAID ORDI-
NANCE~ TO WIT: "1. TFIAT THERE BE NO ENTRANCES ON CEMETERY ROAD. ;
3. ~THAT THAT PORTION OF LOT 4 USED FOR PARKINC PURPOSES SHALL BE
FENCED ALONG CEMETERY ROAD WITH A THREE (3~ F00T ORNAMENTAL ~
FENCE TO ENCLOSE THE PARKING AREA.°
2. THAT THE OWNERSHIP OF SAID CEMETERY P.O~D hiUST BE RESOLVED BY LEGAL AUTHORITIE° .
IN ACCORDANCE WITH LEGAL PROCEDURES. .
3• THAT THE CONDITIONS OF SAID ORDINANCE N0. 963, ESTABLISHING THE USE OF SUB- ~.
JECT PROPERTY~ 4!ERE ADOPTEU AND IMPOSED UPON SAID PROPERTY BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF QNAHEIM~ THEREFORE~ TNE AUTHORITY FOR THE RECONSIDERATION OF SAID CONDITIONS IS ~
VESTED IN THE CITY COUNCIL AND IT IS HEREBY DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ~iNAHEIM THAT THE SUBJECT PcT1T107~ FOR RECLASSIFICATION BE REFERRED TO THE "
CITY COUNCIL FOR REVIEW AND RECONSIDERATION OF SNID CONDITIONS. ~,
NOW~ THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION DOES.HERE- .
BV FORWARD TO THE CITY COUNC~L OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION .
NO. 61-62-63 WITHOUT RECOMMENDATION ON THE BASES OF THE FINDINGS CONTAINED HEREIN.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION IS SIGNED AND APPROVED BY ME
,e
ATTEST:
C~..
T~~I~N
S E OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM
I~ JEAN PAGE~ SECRETARY OF :-'iiE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM~
DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOINf, RL'SOLUTION WAS PASSED AND ADOP'fED AT A MEETING OF
THE CITV PLANN~NG COMMISSION OF THE CIT'/ OF At.AHEIM~ HELD ON FEBRUARY 19~ 1962 Al 2:00
O~CLOCK P.M.~ BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE OF THE MEMBERS THEREOF:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ALLRED~ CAMP~ CHAVOS~ GauER, HAPGOOD~ MARCOUX~ MUNGALL~ PEBLEY~
PERRY.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF~ I HAVE HEREUNTO SET MY HAND THIS 19TH. DAY OF FEBRUtiRY~ 1962.
.C~" ~
~~f A A A J
~- -. - _______.__ . : ~