PC 1961-1962-234i
`~ ~; <~ ~: ;a
,, i ..., y,...~
RESOLUTION N0. 234 SERIES 1961-62
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
;HAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 193 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commisaion of the City of Mahelm did receive a verified Petition fot Conditional
Use Pecmitcrom SILAS W. LEHMER, 1554 Cris Avenue, Anaheim, California, Owner; Rothman-Steen
and Associates,617 South Harbor Boulevard, Suite C, Anaheim, California, Agents of certain
real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, Sta~e of California, as
described in Exhibit "A" or as follows: The East 13 acres of the following described lands
Beginning at a point on the South line of the Southeast q~arter of the Southwest quarter of
Section 20, in Township 4 South, Range 10 West, in the Rancho San Juan Ca3on de Santa Ana,
city of Anaheim, as shown on a map thereof recorded in book 51, page 10, Miscellaneous Maps,
records of said Orange County; 48702 feet West of the Southeast corner of said Southeast
quarter of the Southwest quarter; and running thence West along the South line of said
Southeast quarter of the Southwest quarter, 835 feet to the Southwest corner of said South-
east quarter of the Southwest quarter, said point being 132903 feet East of the Southwest
~~rn~r ~~f sa~d~Sec~~on ?~0~ t~encetNorth~ alon~~ t~ie,~~s~ l~n~ o~hth~ ~hut~e~s~t ~U~agter~ ~€_
e ou wes uar r o ai sec ion, o a in i ee ou o e o n n o a
5outheast quar er o the ou hwest quar er; hence as a ong lie ast men ione ine .~
feet; thence South to the point of beginning • ;and
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commissloa did hold a public hearing et the City Hell in the City of Aneheim on
et 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public hearing having been duly given as requited by
lea end in acco~dance aith thP rrovisions of the Aneheim Municipal code, Chepter 18.64, to hear end conalder'evidence
for and egeinst said proposed cronditionel use and to investigate and meke findings :uid tecrommendetlons iq connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, seld Commission, efter due inspectton, iavestigetion, end study mede by itself and in ita behelf, and
efter due conaidecetion of ell evidence ond reports offered et said headng, does find end determine the following fects:
1. Thet the proposed use is properly one for which a Condltionel.Use Permit is authorized by this Code, to
wit: a planned unit multiple-family residential developmenta
2. Thet the pcoposed use will not edveraely effect the edjoining lend uses and the growth end developmeat of
the aeea in which it is proposed to be loceted.
3. Thet the size end shepe of the site pcoposed for the use is edequete to allow the full development of the
proposed use in e menner not detrimentel to the pe;ticulet erea nor to the peace, health, aefety, end genecel welfe.ce
of the Citizens oE the City of Maheim. u
4. That'the t'~affic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue~burden'upon
the streets and highways designed and proposed to carry traffic in the areao
5. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the conditions imposed, if
any, wili not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the
citizens of the City of Anaheim.
6o That the installation of carports as proposed for the sub~ect property may be
developed in acccrdance with the requirements of the R-A, Residential Agricultusal, Zoneo
7a That the specific waiver of the side and rear yard requirements for the subject
property is hereby deemed ~~ecessary, in order to develop the sub~ect praperty in accordance
with the plans presented, said waiver permitted under the authority governed by Section
180640070 of tha Anaheim Municipal Code.
So That verbal opposition from two owners of property in sub3e~t area was recorded
against subject petitiono
Cl-G
-1-
-- --~ , ~
~ _ .--...__ _ _.:.-. ~ ~
_._ _. . . .~:3{ .. ' ..
-
, ,
' sv."~~ -
~ ,~
,, ~ ~r ~ ~ ~ ~.e.~ ~
( ~ i 1
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Maheim City Plenning Commission does hcreby grent subject
Petltion for Condltionel Use Permit, upon the Eollowing conditions which are hereby found to be a necessery pterequislte
to the pcoposed use of the subject p~operty In order to pceserve the sefety and general welface althe Cltizena oEthe
City of Aneheim: '
lo Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Noe 1, provided •that the carport
structures sha]1 be enclosed on the rear and sides.
2. Provision of a six (6) foot masonry wall along the west, north, and east boundaries prior
to Final 9uilding Inspectiono
3e Installation of a six (6) foot wide landscaping strip abuttinc~ a1d parallel to the
• southerly property line of subject property along Katelia Aver~.•: with the provision of
a six (6) foot masonry wall abutting said landscaping strip, c::c~nt for that area
reserved for ingress and egress to sub~ect property, plans f~,r said landscaping to be
' submitted i~ and subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance,
and with the installation of said landscaping and masonry wall prior to Final Building
Inspectiono
4. Provision of shake roof construction for the residential structures to be established
ondsub~ect property.
5~ ezis~ing~n of sixty (60) feet from the monumented centerline of Katella Avenus (40 feet
6. Preparatio of stre t im rovem nt p1 ns and nstallatio pf all i rovements for Kat 11a
Avenue, su~3ect to ~he a~proval of t~ie City ~ngineer an~ in accor~a~nce with the adop~ed
standard plans on file in the office of the City Engineero
7e Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Katella Avenue.
So P y nt of Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be collected as part
o~ ~~ie Buil~ing Permito
9. P ovis}on f tra h torage areas ag de~~rmined b the Department of Pul~lic Works Sanita-
t~on Divis~on, w~iic~i are adequate in size, acces~ible to trash-truck pick-up, and adequately
enclosed by a solid fence or wall, rior to Final Building Insp~ction.
10. p ovi ion o modifi d cul-de-s cs a~ th terminus of Midwood La g, Tama~ ~.ane and Foj.som
S~ree~, sub~ect to ~he approva~ of the ~ity Engineer, prior to ~Final Bui~ding Inspection.
llo Time limitation of one huridred eigh•ty (180)'days foi the'accomplishment of Ttem Nos. 5,
6, and ?o
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and ap ro•red by me this 19th d• of February, 1962.
ATTEST:
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMM
TARY ANAHEIM CITY PLA ING CbMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) es.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Jean Pege, Secretery of the City Plenning Commiesion of the City of Aneheim, do hereby cectify thet the
fo:egoing cesolution wea passed and edopted at e meetlng oE the City Planning Commis~:on of the City of Aneho:m,
held on pebruary 19, 1962 et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the membera thercof:
AYFS: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Chavos, Gauer, Hapgood, Mungall, Pebley, Perryo
NOES: COMMISSIONEFtS: Marcouxo
AHSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None o
1N WITTIESS WHEREOIF, I haveheceunto set my hand this 19th. day of February, 1962.
SECRET ANAHEIM C1TY PLAN G COMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0.234
C,U.P. No, 193
C2•G -2-