PC 1961-1962-236~ I ~
/~ ~ }~~: { ~)
d , -
~~~ ~ ~.~' ~ ,~~' ~ ...~ ~ a~ , ~:. .-.
~
~ .. ~ y `~
RESOLUTION N0. z36, SERIES 1961-62
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARL4NCE NO. 1445 gE DENIED '
~ WITHOUT PREJUDICE
~ WHEREf.S, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim dtd receive e verified Petition for Veriance from
~ CALARK CORP., 1773~- West Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, California, Owner; HARRY KNISELY, 730
West Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California•, Agent, for cer'tain real property situated in the
; City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described.as follows:
~ . Lot Noso 9 and 10, Block "E" of Lorelei Tract; and
;~~
I
a
;:: ~ ; end
~ WHEREAS the City Plenning Commission did hold a public heedng et the City Iiell in the City of Anaheim on
,,~ February 19~ t96?. et 2:00 ~'clock P.M., notice of seid public hearing ho.;dng been duly given as requlre3 by
law end in exo:dence with the piovisions of the Meheim Municipel Code, Chaptet ,LP.6A, to hear and considet avidence for
~ ond egeinet snid proposed variance and to inves4gate end meke finding's and er~ommmdetlons In connection thetewith;
~~ and
WHEREAS, seid Commisaion, after due inspection, investigation, end ahtdy made by itselE end in its behalE,
'! and efter due coneideseSion of oll evldence and repods oifeced es seid hearing, does find end detecminethe following
facts:
;~ 1. 7'het tho petitioner requeats e vedence from thc Aneheim Municipel Code: SeCtion 18o04a100(2) to
„ permit the proposed development of sub3ect property with side yards eight feet in width; and
Section 18o04a030 to permit the proposed development of subject property with 9arages 9~-feet
,j b~r 20 feet in sizeo
~ 2. That the City Council adopted a Council Policy relative to the Interpretation of
Secti~n 18.32oU50 0£ the Anaheim PAunicipal Code on February 13, 1962, thereby negating the
necessity for any action by the Planning Commission on the sub~ect petition.
'~
;_~
~
~
;
i
i
I
~
j
I
~
I
= ~ ---. . yi.p .1-
...._.... - _" -- ._ . ~-..~'.1 1~ ~
a ~
- ~ ~ ~ ~! '. 6~ '~~ ~ ~r ~ ~ :
; ~~ ~ , ,
_. __ _ _ . __
. _._ _ _ ___ ____.__ _ __ __ _
1:' .. r
. i -,.( ; - }
NOW, THEREF'ORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Aneheim Clty Planniag Commiseioa dxs hereby deny subject
PetitioaforVadence~without prejudice on the bases of the aforementioned findingso
THE FOREGOIIQG RESOLUTION is aigned end eppeoved by me thia 19th. day of February, 1962e
t
;,
>,`.i
~
: ,~
'::~
..~
"~
i
i
;,' ~
~~
~
;~
`;l
A'I'TEST:
/ K/
S ARY ANAHEIId CITY ANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) se. '
CITY OF .ANAHEIb! )
I, Jean Pege, Secretary of the City Plenr,ing Commission of tha City of Anehelm, do heroby cettiEy that the fore-
going cesolution wes pee9ed end edopted at a meeting of the Clty Plenning Commission ofthe City of Anehelm, held on
February 19, 1962 ot 2:00 o'clock P.M., by tho foliowing vote of the membere thereot:
AYES: COMMISSiONERS: Allred, Camp, Chavos. Gauer, Marcoux, Mungall, Pebley,
Perry9 Hepgoodo .
NOES: COMMISSiONERS: None.
AHSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None o •
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 19th. day of February, 1962.
SEC~ v!~„yqHEIM CITY P 1V1NG COMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0. 236
Variance No. 1445
~2-D ~
~.
CHAIRMAN ANAHEI9& CITX PLANNIIiG COMIVBISSION
-2-
~ ..