PC 1961-1962-251~ ~ • . :. . .
, '
~ ,.:
~ . ; ~ ~ ~ ;, ~ -~` ~
. ~
_ ,:- ;
RESOLUTIOa.~NO. ZS1. SfiRIES 1.961-62 ~
. I
A RE50LUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF' ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARTANCE N0. 1450 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anahelm dld recelv@ e vedGed PeGtion for Varlance
from MR. and MRS. ROBERT W. HAHN, 1866 Chateau Street, Anaheim, Cal.ifornia, Owners of
~~ ce*tain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
'• as described in Exhibit "A" or as follows: Lot No. 215 of Tract No. 2425, and further des-
~„ cribed as 1866 Chateau Street
; end
WHEREAS, the City Planni:ig Commisaion did hold e public hearing at the City Heil in the City of Anaheim
on March 5, 1962 at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public hearing having been duly given es cequired
by law aad in accocdence with the provisions of the Meheim Municipal Code, Chepter 18.68,to hear end consid~r
evldence for en8 against seid proposed varience end to investigete and make fiadings end recomnendetione in connec-
¢ion thmn+with; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inapection, investigation, end etudy mnde by itself and in its behalf,
end aRer due consideretion of all evidence and ceports offered as soid hcedng, doea find and determine the following
facts:
1. Thet the petitioner requests e varience from the Meheim Municipei Code: Section 18.24.030 (3) to
to permit an encroachment of eleven C11) feet into the required rear yard of subject
property to permit the contruction of an addition to an existing residence.
2. Thet thece ere exceptionel or extreordinary clccumstences or conditicns epplicable to the prope~ty involved
or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generelly to the property or class of uae in the same vicinity
and zone.
3. That the requested variance is necessary for th~ preservaUon end enjoyment of e substantial property right
possessed by other property in the seme viclnity end zone, and denied to the ptopeety in question.
4. Thet the requested vorience will not be materially detrimentel to the public welfate or injurious io the prop-.
erty or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located.
5. 'Thet the requested variance will not adversely eEfect the Comprehensive Generai Plen.
6. That no one appeared in oQQosition to subject petition.
dl-G
, -:. ~
r.. .. ---- -" '___ {vV ~
-1-
~
I 4~ I i j I
, ~ '~~ , ~ .
t
l . ~
`--~-
~
.~ ~ r „t
r }
~~ ~
NOW, THERErORE, BE IT R~aOLVED that the Anaheim City Plenning Cc3fnmission does hereby grant si:bject
Petition foc Veriance, upon the fot;owing conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary p:ecequisite to the pro-
posed use of the subject pcoperty in order to pceserve the sufety and general welEere of the Citizens of the City of
Aneheim.
1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit. Nos. 1 and 2.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is aigned end approved by me this Sth, day of March, 1962.
~f~~ ~ `~' ~Qit~/L-
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ~ -
ATTEST:
SECR Y ANAHEIM CITY PLAN G COMMISSION
STA OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Jean Page, Seccetery of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do heceby cenify that the foie-
~ going resolution was passed end adopted at e meeling of the City Plenning Commission of the City of AneheIm, held on
' March 5, 1962 at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the followIng vote of the mambers thereof:
i
~i i
~ AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Chavos, Gauer, Hapgood, Marcoux, Mungall,
' Pebley, Perry.
~ NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None .
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 5th, day of March, 1962.
' ~ ~
,
SECR Y ANAHEIM CITY P' ING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 251
Variance No. 1450 :
--- V2-G _Z.
_ . _
, ~
~, _ ..
,. --- ~ ~ i ~ '