PC 1961-1962-329-~'.
\ ..~ ' ~ T ~. ~.. '
~ j~ y ~ ~
.•:~ $ i '
~i ~
O
~ ~. •
~. ~
- _ .. I _ j t.^~
RESOLUTION N0. 329~ SERIES 1961-62
A RESOL[JTlON OF THE CITY PLANNIDTG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
,, THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0.1477 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim did receive a veriGed Petition for Veriance
from MR. and MRS. H. D. ALDERDICE, 2654 Palais Road, Anaheim, California, pwner; NELSON-DYE
CONSTRUCTION INC., 300 East Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California~ Agent of certain real prop-
erty situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California as follows; Lot
No. 20 in Tract 3104 and further described as 2654 Palais Road, Anaheim, California
; and
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold a pnbHc headng et the City Hell in the City of Aneheim
on Mdy 28~ 1962~ si 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seud public heariag having been duly given as required
by law and in accordance wlth the provislona of the Meheim Municipal Code, Chepter 18.68,to hear and considee
evldence for and egaiast said proposed varience and to investigete and meke findings and recommendetions in connec-
tion the~ewith; and
;
~ 9YHEREAS, said Commiesion, efter due inspection, investigetlon, and study made by itself end in its behalf,
• end efter due consideration oE all evidence and zeports offered es seid headng, does find and determine the following
facts: ,
I
i 1. Thet the petitioner cequests e verience from the Aneheim MunicIpel Code: SeCtion 18.24.030 (3) to
permit a three and one-half (3~)foot encroachment to construct an addition to residence on
j subject property.
2. Thet there are exceptionel or extreordinery circumstencea or conditions appliceble to the property involved
or to the intended use of the propecry thet do not epply genereliy to the property or cless of use in the seme vicinifry
end zone.
3. That the requested veriance is necessery for the preaervation and enjoyment of a substentiel property right
poaseased by other property in the eame vicinitr,~ end zone, and denied to the ptopedy in question.
4. Thet the requested varience wIll not be materially detrimet~tel to the publlc welfate or injurious to the pmp-
edy or improvements in such vlcutity end zone in which the property is loceted.
~ 5. Thet the requested varience will not a3versely effect the Comprehensive General Plen.
6. That no one appeared in o~po~ition to subject petition.
Vl-G ~ -1-
' _- -- - i~
_
_' r,:
F '
... . .~
5 ~ ~ .~' _.' ' _
~~~- ~ ~ `~ ~ '
\. r I
~ ~"~
V " ., ~
NOW, THEREFURE, BE IT RESOLVEP thet the Anaheim City Pienning Commission does hereby gcant s~zbject
PeUtion for l'arience, upon the following conditions which ere hereby found to be e necessary prerequisite to the pro-
posed use of the subject pcoperty in order to preserve the safety and general welface of the Citizen~ of the City of
Aaeheim.
1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2.
~r
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is siqned end epproved by me this 28th day of May~ 1962.
~ ( /
_ls~~~~/'/v':,. ~.C.. l% •/ ~~/ /i
CHAIRMI~.N ANAHETM CITY PLANNING COMMISSIO
ATTEST:
V"'%'(' ~ / ~~~/ ~a-;.7/
~ /, ~
;J SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~
~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
;
{ COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
~ CITY OF ANAHEIM )
' I~ Ann Krebs~ Secretery of the City Plenning Commiasion of the City oE Aneheim, do hereby cr.rtify that the fore-
I going resolution wes pessed end edopted at a meeting of the City Plenning Commissiot~ of the City of Aneheim, held on
' May 28th~ 1962, et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
`; AYES: COMMiSSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Chavos, uauer, Hapgood, Marcoux, Mungall, Pebley,
Perry.
! NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
' j ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None.
! ~ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hend this 2Et11 day Of May~ 1962.
I ~
'~" ~ -'~ .l: L....~/_: ,
~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
I RESOLUTION NO. 329
~
V2-G .Z_
t - __-----~ ..._ _ _
~ _-_, ~ ..
_._ »~.i ~ . --