PC 1961-1962-331( l t
a
° ~ ~t 4 ~~.' i~ ~ ~ !
~ ~..~ 'j!. - 'I :~'s
RESOLUTION~NO. 331: SF32IES, 1961-62 ~'~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PI.ANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THl+T PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. ~.480 BE G12ANTED ~
WHEREA~, the Ciry Pleiusing Commiesioe of the City oE Rc~eheim did receive a vedfied Petition for Vedence
from PETRENY~.INCo'.JAMF.S.ADID ~T.INE TWEDBELL PATRIGIA J HORTON ~p~g.~[~ CH E~o
10422 ~arden Grove Bouleqard~ (3arden Grovep ~alifornia9 ~nersf ~II~Q~ INVESTAIEPT CA~~~AY,
511 West Wilken Way, Ana~eimq.California~ A.gehts of certain real pr~perty situated in the
City of Anaheim; County of Orange, State of California; as follows; The Northwest quarter
of the Northwest quarter of the Northwes~ quarter of Section 27, Township 4 South, Range 10
West9 in the Rancho San .Tuan Ca9on de Santa Ana9 as shorm on a mep xecorded in Book F1; pa~e
10 of Miacellaneous Mapsy records of Orange Countyy California. Excepting therefrom the
Easterly 120o0b feet. Also excepting therefram the Westerly 190000 feet. Also excepting
therefrom ±he Wester,ly 150v00 feet of the Easterly 270.00 feet af the Northerly 330000 feet.
Also excepting t}~erefrom.the Northerly 30.00 feet•. The Westerly 100,00 feet of the Easterl~r
37Q.00 f eet .bf the Northerly 140.00 f eet of the Nar.thwest .quar.ter ..af #he Nnrthwest quarter of
the.Northwest quarter bf Section 27~ I'ownship !~ Suuth, Range 10 West, in the Rancho San Juan
Ca~on de Santa Ana, as shown on a map recorded in book 51, page 10 of Miscellaneous Maps~ re-
cords of Orange County, Californiaa Excepting therefrom,the Northerly 30.00 feet and~
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commiseion did hold a public headng at the City Hall in the City of Aneheim
on May 28y 19629 et 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing having been duly given es cequiced
by law end itt eccordence with the provielone of the At-aheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.68, to heer end conaider
evidence for. and against said pcoposed veriactce and to invea~igete and make findtngs and cecommendations in connec-
tion therewi8h; end
WHE;REAS, seid Commieslon, eftar due inapectlon, investigation, aad atudy made by itself and in its behalf,
and aftee due coneideration of ell evidence and eeports offered ae aeid hearing, does fiad end deteanine the following
facts:
1. Thet the,petitioner requeats a vasience from the Anaheim'tdunicipet Code: Section 16.16:r010 to permit
the establi§hment of an uff ice building and m~tel on sub~ect property.
2. That the~e ere exceptionel oe extreo:dinary circumatences or conditioas eppliceble to the property invoived
or to the intended uae of the pcoperty thet do not epply generelly to the propexty or clasa of use ie the seme vicinity
and zone.
3. That the cequested varience is necessery for the presecvetion end enjoyment of a aubstantial propedy dght
possessed by other property in the eame viclnity end zone, and denied to the property in question.
4. Thet the reqnested vadence will not be materially detrlmental to the public welfate or inju~i~us tolheprop-
edy or impM.~c,«ents in such 1+_ciniky and zoae in whiah the pmpetty is located.
5. T'nat :he reguest~ ra,:ance ~r311 no! e+dveraely effect the Comprehensive General Plan.
6a That no one spheaxed in 6~pua'ition to subject petitiona
Vl-G "1'
~----- ~ -- .._ . _.._._ .. _ -_ __ _ - -_... __ . _.. . ._ - -- - _
__- •-
R'.~.:~ ~ ' ~ .....-, ... _._....._ ........ .... ~ ~ ~ .
~t~ ' . .. . . .. _ _. . . . ,.
,
~ A r
l .'~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ 4 ~ ~! ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~J ~ ,
t- ~
~,
., " .~ -%~j ~~~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT 1RESOLVED that the Aneheim City Planning Commission does hereby gcent subject
Petition for Vedance, upon the followiag coaditione which are hereby found to be a necessary precequisite to the pm-
posed use of the subject pcoperty in oidec to preserve ffie eafety ead genetai welfere of the Citizens of the City of
Anaheim. '
1. Provision that the proposed office building be used as a business c+ff ice by the owr;er
of the propOSed motel, and that no real estate off ice be ~llorred in said off ice building, ttiat
an identificatidn sign for said office building be no largar than two (2) feet by four (4)
feet and that signs for said mntel be in accoadance with code requirements.
2~ Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2, with the exception
that the twa driveways revising the northerly portion of subject property shall be connected
in order to provide adequate circulation for automobilesy trash-trucks, and f ire trucks; ;I
said driveways to be subject to the approval of the Fire Department.
3~ Installation of landscapinq in the twenty (20) foot setback from the planned highway
right-of-way line of Katella Avenue; plans f or said landscaping to be submitted to and sub-
~ect to the approval of the superintendent of Parkway Maintenance, and said landscaping to
be.installed prior to Final Building Inspection.
4. Dedication of ~ixty (60) £eet from the monumented centerline of Katella Avenue (forty
(40) feot exlsting). `
5a Preparation.of 'street improvemeht plans and installation of all improvements for Katella~
AyenueK subject to the appraval of the Citg Engineer and in accardance with the adopted stand-
arcl plans on file in tMe Off ice of the City Engineer.
6~ Payment of $2a00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Katella Avenue.
7. Provision of tresh storage areas as determined by the Department of Public Works9 San- _
itetion Division, which are adequate in sizey accossible to trash-truck pickup; and adequately
enclosed by a solid f ence or wall, prior to Final Building Inspection.•
8, Access drives shall be a minim~ of twenty-one (21) feet in.width with adequate angl~ ;
cutoffs provided; or a minimwn of twenty-eight (28) feet in width if no anqle culoff s are :
prnvided and in all cases, shall have a minimum vertical clea*ance of fourteen (l4) feet.
9d Installation of f ire h~Yd:ants as determined to be necessary by the City of Anahetm
Fire Marshall to provide adequatefire protection.
10. Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days for the accomplis hment•of Item
Nos. 4, 5, and 6.
11: Provision that if sald motel were soldy the future owner be required to petitioh for
a variance fOr any subsequent use of said office building. ~ _;
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and app oved by me this 26th rlay of May, 1962.
~
ATTESTt
CHAI N ANAHEIM CITY P NNING OOMMISSI
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) es•
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann KT~bs' Seccetary of the City Planning Commiasion of the City of Aneheim, do he~eby certify thet the foce-
going reaolution wes passed end adopted et a meeting of the City Plenning Comroission ofthe City of Aneheim, held on
May 2F~ 1962y at 2:00 a'c!ock P.M., by the followiag vote of the membeea thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred~ Cemp, Ga~tery Hapgood, Marcoux, Munga119 Pebley, Perrya
NOES: COMMTSSIONERS: Chavos.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NOne.
IN WITNFSS WHEREOF, I heve heieunto set my hand thia 28th day of May~ 1962:
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0. 331
V2-G '2'
. . . ,v:;rS
---~-
__ _ .___, . _..__..__ _ _..__..
__.._._ . __ _ __. __...._. _..
_ ,
~ . _._. _ .