PC 1961-1962-333'. ~ --. e ~ ~4 !
.
1
,- ~}~: ~ :~ ~ ~+
~ ~,::
Vi c'~
~,._ _
!.'
i: .
/ ^
_ ~ l -1 ~ f
~ RESOLUTION N0.333_ , SERIES 1961-62 '
A RESOLUTION OF TFIE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0.1463 BE GRANTED ~
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim did :eceive a verified Petition for Variance
f:om MR. and MRS. RICHARD SMALL~ 94y McCloud, Anaheim, California, Owners: HARVEY L. LUCAS,
General Contractar, 4517 Tiller Avenue, Orange~ California~ Agent of certain real praperty
situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California as £ollows; Lot 71
in Tract 2259 and further described as 949 McCloud Avenue, Anaheim, California
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public heering et the City Hall in the City of Aneheim
on May 28~ 1962' et 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid pubiic heedng ha~ing been duly given es requi:ed
by law end in accordence with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chepter 18.68,to heer and consider
evideace for and against seid proposed variencP and to investigete end make findings and recommendetions in connec-
tlon therewith; end
WHEREAS, seid Commission, afte: due inspection, investigation, end study mede by itself and in its behalf,
and efter due consideration of ell evidence and repods oEfered eF seid headng, does find and dete:mine the follow}ng
facts:
1. Thet the petitioner requests a varience from the AnahPim Municipal Code: Sectian 18.24.030 (3) to per-
mit the construction of an addition to exist3ng residence.
2. Thet thece ace exceptionel or extreordInery circumstences or conditions epplicable to the property involved
or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generelly to the property or cless of use in the seme vicinity
and zone.
3. That the requested variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantiel property right
possessed by other propedy in the seme vicinity and zone, end denied to the propedy in question.
4. That the requested variance will not be meterieily detrimental to the public welfere or injurious to the pmp-
edy or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the propedy is located.
5. That the requested variance wiil not adveraely effect the Comprehensive General Plan.
6. That no one appeared in opposition to sub~ect petition.
Vl-G
-1-
_; ___.--°---~___._ .._. .. .. ..__...._ . .-- _ _ __ ..___;
~ ~1 ~
~ .
•'~
~
~
;
,f. T
~~~~ ~ ~ ~ F ~~~ ~
~
l
~ ,}
^ ~ t. ~ '~'.. /~
' NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Anaheim City Plenning Commission does hereby grant subject
Petition for Variance, upon the following conditioas which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the pro-
posed use oE the subject pcoperty in o:der to pceserve the sefety and genecal welfare of the Citizens of the City of
Anaheim.
1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit No. 1.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is sig,~ed end approved by me this 28th day of May~ 1962.
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISS
ATTEST: • ,.
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs~ Secretery of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do heceby cedify that the foce-
going resolution was pecsed end adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission ofthe City of Anaheim, held on
May 2R~ 1962, et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
A1'ES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Chavos, Gauer, Hapgood, Marcoux, Mungall, Pebley,
Perry.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Hone.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have heceunio set my hend this 26th day of May~ 1962.
L/v~~'~~'V
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0.333
V2-G '2'
.~..-------.. ._____ ._._ __
_ _..._ ___. ..-
_ _..___ - __ _ -- -_ _ _.
~, •
_'^'..T ~ ~ . . .. .... .. . . .. _ ~ . . . .. _. _ .