PC 1961-1962-336;~f _ ~ ~~-~- i..
f
g ~
l ip
~ ~ C r ~~ I t
~ '
~ - ~
;a ~
,~a *
- ' ~w
~ ~ '~, ~~ <~ ;r
RESOLUTION N0.336, SERIES 1961-62 '"~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 1474 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Plancing Commission of the City of Aneheim did ceceive e verified Petition for Varience
from LONG BEACH BANANA DISTRIBUTORS INOORPORATED, 1419 Magnolia Avenue, Long Beach, Califor-
nia, Ownexs; JOHN H. IRWIN, 5230 Clark Streett Suite 11, Lakewood, California, Agent of cer-
tain real property situated in trie City of Anaheim, County of Or~nge, State of California
as follows, Lot Nosa 236 and 237 in T•ract 2377, and further described as• 901 thru 957 South
Euclid Avenue, Anahe,im, California
; and
WHEREAS, the Clty Plenning Commission did hold e public headng at the City Hell in the City of Anaheim
a~ May 26f 1962, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing heving been duly given as required
by law end in eccocdence with the provisions of the Aneheim Municipel Code, Chapter 18.68,to hear and consider
evidence for end egainsQ eaid proposed varience and to invesiigete end make findings and cecommendations in conneo-
tion therewith; •and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspectian, investigation, and study made by itself and in its behelf,
and after due conside:ation of all evidence and reports offered as seid hearing, does find and determine t}~e following
facts: .
1. That the petitioner requests e variance fcom 4he Aneheim Municipal Code: Ordinance No. 1046 to establish,.
customer and service parking on 72.3 % of subject property.
2. That there are exceptionel or extraordinary ciecumstences or conditions epplicoble to the pcopecty involved
or to the intended use of the property that do not epply generelly to the pmperty or class of use in the same ~icinity
and zone.
3. Thet the requested ver:ence is necessary Eor the preseivation and enjoyment of a substantiel property right
possessed hy other properry in the seme vicinity aad zone, and denied to the propecty in questian.
4. That the requested varience will not be meterially detrimental to the public welfete or injueions to the pmp-
e~y or improeements in such vicinity and zone in which the propecry is located.
' S. That the requested varience will not adversely affect the Compcehensive Ge~ieral Plen.
6. That no one appeared in oppositlon to subject pe~ition.
Vl-G
-1-
...
- ~ _. ..---_____.._-- ---~--- ._ _..._
~; ,
: .:. ,
._::_, __. _ . ,- - -...--_
, _.. _ .
:u~ ~ . . ...
a ~ `l
~~ d ;~S ~ - ~ :.~ ~~ f :; -
~- ~
:.r
,i.
','..I
,,,,
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and eppmved by me this 28th day Of May~ 1962.
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COIISMISSION
~
,~
'i
:~
~:i
:~
~~
' ' ~ V .- T.
~ ' ^, ~ ' ~
i
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Aneheim City Pl~nning Commission does heceby grant subject
Petition foc Veriance, upon the following conditioas which are heceby found to be a necessery pcerequisite to the pro-
posed use of the subject pcopecty in order to pceserve the sufety and ~eneml welface of the Citizens of the City of
Meheim.
1. De~ication of fifty-three (53) feet from the mofl~mented centerline of Ball Road and
Euclid Avenue (50 feet existing).
2. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public WoTks,
Sanitation Division, for the entire shopping center, wh~ch are adequate itr size, accessible
to..trash-truck pickup, and adequately enclosed by a solid fence or wall, prior to Final
Building Inspectior~.
3. Provision of parking facilities which conform to the open-air parking space dimentions
adopted by the Planning Commission and on f ile with the Planning Department.
4. Provision for a miniminn five (5) foot setback on the Beacon Street right-of-way,
with the installatian of f ive (5) foot landscaping on the Beacon Street frontage of subject
property, plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and subfect to the approval of the
Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance, and said landscaping to be installed prior to Final
Building Inspection.
5. Provision for revised plans to be submitted to the Architectural Control Committee
indicated elevations for the rear of said building with a decorative three and one-half (3~)
foot block wall and overhang on the north side of Beacon Street.
ATTEST:
~/~/
SECRETARY ANAIiEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs~ Seccetary of the City Pianning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that t}:e fo:e-
going resolution wes passed end edopted at a meeting of :he City Plsnning Commission ofthe City of Anaheim, held on
rnay 2a, 1962, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following ve!e of the members thereof:
i
~--- ` -
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Czmp, Cha~os, Gauer, Hapgood, Marcoux~ Mungall, Perry.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: pebley.
IN WITNESS WHGREOF, I have heceunto set my hend this 28th day of May~ 1962.
SECRETARY ANA.HEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 336
V2-G -Z-
_----.--,.~---------.___.______... __________._..
.., ~ -- -_...__ -__.._....___ .
~~ ' ~