PC 1961-1962-342~
~ ~ ~! i ~ i ~ E
;::~ :~ ~ ~
,
~~ :~
4, 1'.' . .f' . ~ R'.' ,
t' ~.
.~. _ '. i~.. ~ ~`~'. . . ~.:
RESOLUTION N0.342. SERIES 1961-62
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C3TY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N061-62-106 gE APPROVED
WHEREAS, Ehe Citp Planning ~Commission of the City of Maheim did :eceive a vecified Petition for Recles'sifica-
tionfrom ALPINE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, 820 South Grand Avenue, Santa Ana, California, Owner of
certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
as follows, the Westerly 220 feet of the following: Commencing at a point 219.25 feet South
of the Northwest corner of the South half of the Northwest•quarter of the Northwest quarter of
Section 12, in Township 4 South, Range 10 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, in the City
of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, running thence south 117 feet; thence East
1320 feet to the East line of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest.quarter of said Section
12; thence North 117 feet; thence West 1320 feet to the point of beginning
; and
WIiEREAS, the Ciry Plenning Coma~issiou did }~old a publlc hearing et the City ':all in the City of Anaheim or.
May 2$~ ].9629 at 2:00 o'clock P.M. nouce of eafd public hearing heving beQn duly given as required •by
law and in eccordence with the provisions of the Mufieim AQunicipal Code, Chepter 18.72, to hear end consider evidence
for and ageinst seid ptoposed reclensificetion ead to inveaUeate end meke findings and recommendatio~a in connection
therewith; end •
WEiEREAS, said Commiesion, eEtee due inspectioa, investigetion, and study mede by itself end in its behalf, and
aRer due consideration of all evidence end ~epoRe offcred at satd headng, does find end determine the following fects:
1. That the petitioner proposea a reclaaslRcation of 4he eboae desceibed propedy from the C-1, Neighborhood
Commercial, Zone (prohibiting the sale of alcoholic beverages) to the C-1 Neighborhood
Commercial, Zone unrestricted.
2. That the proposed reclessificetion of subject piopetty is necessary end/or desireble toc the oRde:ly end pra
per development of the community.
3. That the proposed reclaseiUcetion of subject ptoperty does properly celate to the zones end'their permitted
uses locally established in close proximity to subject property and to tne zones end their permltted uaes generally esteb-
lished throughout the community. '
4a That the proposed reclassification of subject property does not require dedication
for and standard improvemeni of abutting streets•because said property does relate to and
abut upon streets and hi~hways which are improved to carry the type.and quantity of traffic,
which will be generated by the permitted uses, in accordance with the circulation element of
the General Plan. '
5. That two persons, one of whom represented 35 neighboring property owners, appeared
in opposition to subject petition. ~
Rl-A '1'
C . . - -
., ...'.4 .~~: ...
~ ' J ~
~ ~ ~~•~ ~:~ : bf ~
' t .. ~ ' i J '?,J~:
• • ~ ~~` . ~~
Gi
NV11', THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby recommend
to the City Council of the City of Anaheim thet subject Petition for Reclassificetion be appmved and, by so doing,
that Title 18-Z~ning of the AnaheIm Municipel Code be amende3 to exclude the above described property from the
C-1, Neighborhood Commercial, Zone, (prohibiting the sale of alcoholic beverages) and to
incorporate said described property in the C-1, Neighboxhood Commercial, Zone, (unrestr3cted)
upon the following conditions which are hereby found tc be a necessary prerequisite to the
proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of
the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
1. It is recommended to the City Council that Ordinance No. 1590 be amended so as to
require the recardation of amended C-1, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL 7ANEdeed restriction to wit;
"No. 3. No building shall be used for residential purposes unless zoneds no sale of beer,
wine or li}~or be allowed except that the sale of beer and wine may be permitted in connection
with the sale of restaurant food, and further subjeet to approval by a Conditional Use Permit."
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end approved by me this 26th day of May~ '1962.
ATTEST:
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY ANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY CF OR~4NGE ) ss~
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs~ Secretary of the Ciry Planning Commission of the City of Anoheim, do hereby cedify that the fore-
gaing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting uf the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on
May 28~ 1962~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Gauery Marcoux9 Mungall, Pebley, Per~=•:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Chavos.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Hapgoodo
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 28th day of May~ 1962.
RESOLUTION NO. 342
R2-A
2%`~'
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-2-
_.. .__.._....~ ---- _. _ _...._._ __ . .__ .___
._ ____.... .._ _..
; , i _ _-- . _ _.
.. ! ~ ..
i