PC 1961-1962-355~' ~ 'p ~~
1,~~'~ RESOLUTIt.e'N0.355~ SERIES 1961-62 <
~~ •
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSIQN OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ~
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 1486 BE DENIED '
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Cammission of the City of Aneheim did receive a vedfied Petltion for Vadence from
F. A. YIIIVGBLUTH, 815 West Broadway, Anaheim~ California, Owners GLENN P. FRY; 187 West Lincoln
Avenue, Anaheim, California, Agent of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim,
- County of Orange, State of California, as foll~wss Original Building Lot 5, as shown on a map
of L'ands of Anaheim, recorded in book 4, pages 629 and 630, Deeds, Records of Los Angeles
County, California; Excepting therefrom that portion thereof as granted to Peter J.. Weisel in
deed recorded January 6, 1904, in book 98, page 364, Deeds' records of said Orange Countyj'Also '
excepting therefrom that portion ther?of as granted ta Frederick W. Kellogg, in deed recorded
March 20, 1923, in book 462, page 94, De~ds, records nf said Orange County
; and
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold a public headng et thc City Hell in the City of Maheim on
June 11~ 1962 at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid publlc hearing having been duly g(ven es required by
law end in axordence with the provisions of the Aneheim Municipal Code, Chepter 18.68, to hear end consider evidence for
end against seid propased vecience end to investigate end meke finding's and recommendeti~ns in connection therewith;
end
WFIEREAS, seid Commission, efter due inspection, investigaUon, and study made by itself and in its behalf,
and efter due coneideretion of all evidence and reports offered as seld heering, does find end determine the followiag
fects:
1. Thet the petitioner requests a vedence from the Aneheim Municipal Code: SeCtiOn 18.44.010 t0 establish
a furniture re-upholstering service.
2. That there are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or canditions applicable
to the property involved'or to the intended vse of the property that do not apply generally to
the property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone.
3. That the requested variance is not neCessary for the preservation and enjoyment of
a substantial property right possessed by other propex•ty in the seme vicinity and zone, and
denied to the property in question.
4. That the requested variance will be :naterially detrimental to the public welfare
or in~urious ;;o the property or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is
located.
5. :hat the requested vsriance will adversely aifect the Comprehensive General Plan.
6. That the subject property would be incompatible with the proposed use~
7. Thet no one appeared in opposition to subJect petition.
Vl-D.
-1-
~
~
~
:; . i
~am
~
.~ ,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Aaeheim Ciry Plenning Commiselon does hereby deny subject
Petition for Varience on the basis of the afotementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and epp:oved by me this llth day of June~ 1962.
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIIZG COMMISSIO
ATTEST: ~
/:~2~'~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) es. ' '
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ AnR Krebs' Sec:etery of the City Planning Commiaelan of the City of Aneheim,. do heceby cettify that the fore-
going cesolution was pessed end edopted et a meetittg of the City Plenning Commiseion of the City of Aneheim, held on
June lly 1962, at 2:00 o'clock P,M„ by the following vote of the membera thereof;
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Chavosy Gauer, Marcouxy Mungall, Pebleyy Perry.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Hapgood. .
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I.heve hereunta set my hend ti,:s llth day of June~ 1962.
~~
SECR~TARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANIIING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0. 355
V2-D ~ -2'
~. . _. . ~------------~ ~.--
--_~! _ _ i.':; ~.
, . .. .. .. .. . --- si~i
;
~
i
i
t
;