PC 1961-1962-364r ~:»
,~
RESOLUTION N0.~04y ~erclna 1y01-OL
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLAN23ING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF 'i`~dE CITY OF ANAHEIlIC TYiAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-109 HE DENIED
WHEREAS, fhe City Plenning Commission of the City of Meheim did receive e vedx~ed Petition for Recle'ssifica-
tionfrom NAROLD A. and ROBERTA SWANSON, 2117 Anaheim-Olive Road, Anaheim, California, OwnersF
W. WELSH MORNINGSTA6,107 East Lincoln Avenue9 Anaheim, California, Agent of cert~in real prop-
erty situated in the City.oi Anaheim~ County of Orange, State of California, as followss Lot
6 of Tract No. 1843, as shawn on a map •thereof recorded in book 53, pages 45 ~nd 46, Miscell-
aneous Maps, records of said Orange County
; end
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a pqblic headng at the City Hell •in the City of Aneheim on
June lly 1962~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing heving been duly givm es required
by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Maheim Muaicipel Code, Chepter 18.72,f.o hear aad coasider evI-
dence for and egainst seid proposed reclassificetion and to investigate and make findings end ~ecommendetions in
conaection therewith: and
WHEREAS, seid Commission, efter due inspection, invc~lgaUon, and study made by itself and ia its behelf,
and after due consideretion of ell evidence and reports offered et seid hearing, does find and determine the following
fects:
1. Thet the petitloner proposes e eeclassificetion of the above described property from the R-ly One Family
Residential, Zone to the C-1, Nelnhborhood Commercial, Zone (restricted to Medical Offices),
to .establish a medical off ice.
2.. That the proposed reclassification of subject property is not necessaay and/or
desirable for the orderly and proper development of the community.
3; That the proposed reclassif~cation of subiect property does not properly relate
to the zones and ~cheir pe.mitted uses locally established in close ~;s:oximity to sub~ect prop-
erty and to the zones and their permitted uses generally established throughout the community.
4. That the proposed reclassification was not compatible to the area, that if sub~ect
petitfon were approved, a precedent would be set for the entixe area.
Rl-D -1- ,
p
~C
y
~
t ~~
r N
~ _~ :
~
S~
'•1. :
f' ~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Meheim City Plenning Commission does heceby cecommend
to the Clty Council of the City of Anaheim thxt aubject Petition for ReclassiHcetlon be denied on the basis oE the
eforeu~entioned findinge.
TI3E FOREGOING t2ESOLUTION is ~igned end appcoved by me this llth day Of Juney 1962. ,'
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSI
• ~
P.TTEST:
___~~L=' ~G~/ ~/ ,.._
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
C1TY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs~ Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do heceby cectify thet the fore-
going ~esolution wes passed end adopted et a meating of the City Plenning Commission of t;ie City of Anaheim, held on
June 11~ 1902~ at 2:00 o'clack P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:Allred, Camp, Chavos, Gauer, Marcoux, Mungally Pebley, PQrry.
NOES: COMMISSIONEkS: None.
ABSc;NT: COMMISSIONERS: Hapgood. ~
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hgve hereunto aet my hand thia l.lth d8j~ of June~ 1962.
,c .v~ ~ /'
/G
SECRETARY r`.NAHcIM CITY' PLANNING CO;dMISSION
RESOLUTION N0.364
R2-D
.~
-------_ _-._ _.__..._ ..___._... ...__..__ ._ .---__ _,
_ _ . _.... .._ . ..-- - - - --- _,. _. .
- ---- __ ... -- -
~
- ~. • --° ". ,~t ~P