PC 1961-1962-369r~~ ~.~.:.~ ,r.,...,. .~. .. ,,,,..,,_.-, h.,_., _V.v- ... .._ ,., . ~2;
/ ~l` . . ~,~ -°,~.~~
RESOLUTION NO. 369. SERIES 1961-62
A RESOLUT?ON OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RE~OMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N061~62-116 _ BE DENIEU
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim did receive a verified PetiCion for Recta'ssifica-
tionfcom VIOLA M. JONES~ 215 South Bush9 Anaheim~ California~ Ownerj HARRY B. LINDNEBERG~
214 North 8unkist, Anaheim9 California, Agent of certain real property situated in the City
of Anaheiin, County or Orange, State of California, as followsc Lot No. 22, Block A, in
the Lorelei Tract, and further described as 215 South Bush Streety Anaheim, California
; end
NHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a pqblic hearing et the City Hell •in the Ciry of pnaheim on
June 11~ 1962y at 2:00 dclock P.M., notice of said publlc headng having been duly given es reqained
by law aad in eccotdance with the provieions of the Aneheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.72,to hear end consider evi-
dence Eor and egainst said propoaed reclessificati~:n end to investigete end meke findings end recommendationn ia
connection therewith: and
WHEREA3, eaid Commission, efter dce inspection, investigetlon, end study mede by i4self end in its behelf,
and aftec due considecation oE all evidence and repods offered at said hearing, does find end detetmine the following
fact~: ~ ,
1. Thet the petitioner pcoposes ~ reclassification of the ebove deacribed property from the R-1~ One FBmily
Residential, Zone ta the R-3, Multiple Family Residential, Zone to construct a one four~unit
single story apartment. •
2s That the proposed reclassification of sub~ect property is•not necessary and~or de-
sixable for the orderly and proper development of the community:
3. That the proposed reclassif ication of subJect property does not properly relate to
t6e zones and their permitted uses locally established in close proximity to sub~ect prop-
erty and to the zones and their permitted uses generally establist~~d throughout the commun~.ty.
4, That the proposed development was too dense fcr the square foot aree of subject
property, and that no recreational facilities were provided on the proposed plans.
5v That one person representing nearby neighbors appeared in oppbsition to sub~ect
petition.
Rl-D
-i-
_-..__._- ------ ___ ._. _...._ _,...:
__.,_-.._ -~.--.~::,,- ~
~ '
.,,..~.....~.,._.~Y.,,~,.~.~-_.,....,.,..... ~. rt ~ ,.r., r :.. -,:. ~ .~,. _...,., -~ . --- _. .
..._ _ _ t
. ..._ _ .~:: .,.:,.:,~~.,..,,..,..~... ~.._.~_..._..___ _ _
.~i y. y . . . _ . . :
. ~1~ '; /' ~ ' . ~ , ~
1
NOW, THEREF012E, HE IT RESOLVED thet thr, Anaheim City Pleaning Commission does hereby cecommend
to the City Co~,acil of the City of Aneheim that subJect Petition for RecleasifIcetion be denied on the besis of the
efocementiorted $ndinga.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTIQ:v is signed t+nd epprovcd by me thisllth day of June; 1952.
ATTEST:
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSI
~!~~ ~ ~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COI3NTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs9 Seccetary oE the City Plenning Commission of the City of Maheim, 'do h~reby certify thet the Jo:e-
going resolution was pessed end adopted et a meetlng of the City Plenning Commiasion ofthe City ef Anaheim, held on
June ily 1962~ at 2:00 o'clock P.Nf., by the 4ollowing vote of the membeT~ thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp~ Chavbs, Gauer~ Marcoux~ Mungall, Pebley, Perry.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NOne.
A$SENT: COMMISSIONERS: Hapgoodr
IN iV1;,NESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hend this llth dey of June* 19b2.
~ y ~~~-
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIIVG COMMISSiON
12ESOLUTION N0. 369
R2-D
. , . .. . . ,......, . ~ ~ . • ~ ~ . .
-2-
~
3
_
a
.. ..._" .._.__..._._-'-- .
---'--._-~_.___, '
_'...,. ._.._..kl~ .