PC 1961-1962-380. ,~ ..~ r ~ -:,~ . .,.
~~.:. ~., i.~.~
- ~ '~~ ~ ` ~~~: ~ ~F ~,6 ~. ~
r : `Q.~y ~ l
~1 5
t
-.W~` a..,u~.._;~.~.:.~.~~~.nna~r.~~r~~..~ ~ - ..
. . . . ,.~ ~'..
r '6 ~.
~ ~~ ~`~ 3Q0. SERIES 1961-62 '~ `~~.
RESOLUTIOAi N0. ~
. ;;i
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COIHMISSION OF THE CITY'DF ANAHEIM ~
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 1500 BE GRANTED ' ~'>
. WHEREAS, the City Pleaning Commisaion of the City of Meheim dxd tecaive :. vokaiad P~tition for Vedence >;1
fmm GEORGE and ALBERT R. LARRABEE~ 1568 Wes~ Lincoln, Anaheim~, Celi£crui.a, Owners; MILT ~;
McCpY, 1568 West Lincoln, Anaheimy California, Agent of certain r::21 prc~erty situated in
the City of Anaheim~ County of Orangey State of Californiay as folluwst ~.ot No. 5 in Tract
4614, and further described as 2110 Balsam Avenue, Anaheim, California ~
'
i
3
; and
WHE1tEAS, the City Plenning Commisaion did hold a public headng at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim
on June 25~ I962~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public heering kaving been duly given ea required
I by law and in ecrntdence with the provisions of the Maheim Municipel Code, Cheptee 18.58,to hear and considec
evidence for end egoinst said proposed varience and to inves~igate and meke findings end cecommendations in connec-
tion the:~with; and
' WHEREAS, seid Commiseion, efter due ir.spection, inveatigetion, aad stud;~ made by itself end in its behelf,
and after due conaidetetlon of all evideace and repotts offeced as wns~ ?;~aring, does find and detecmine the following
' • fects:
~ 1. That the,petitioner cequesta e vc+riaeice fram the Aneheim Municipal i:ode: SeCtion 18.32.060 to permit
I the completion'of a two stc,ry multiple family apartment building.
2. That thece are exceptionel or extraordinary circumstences or conditions eppflcable to the propecty inv~lved
or to the intended uae of the propecty that do nat epply genecally fo the pmperty or class of use in the seme vicinity
and zone.
3. That the requested variance is neceasery for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial pmperty dght
poasessed by other p~operty in the same vicinity snd zone, end denied to the property in queation.
4. 'fhet the requested verience will not be matedally detdmentel to the public welfase or iajurious to the prop-
eety or impmvements in such vicinity end zone in which the propetty is loceted.
• 5. Thet the tequasted vedence wili not edversely effect the Comprehensive Genorel Plen.
6. That the petitioner and the.home ownPSS.abuttinq sub~ect ~xoperty have agreed by
stipulation that a six (6) foot wall shall be constructe3 0:~ the east side of the alley, that
said wall shall be six feet above the R-l grade, but shall nat be.more than •~he heiglit approved
by the Building Departm?nt as safe~structures on the-existi~;g retainiag.ytalls opposite•Lot
Nos. 4 and 9 of Tract-rlo. 4614, and that the R-1 property owners shall obtain the ne~essary
buildin.g.permits and that construction of said wall shall be done by the petitioner, with
cwnership of said walls to remein as property of the owners of said R-1 property. ~
7: That three persons appeared 'zn conditional objection to sub3ect petition.
Vl-G
-1-
, ;
~
;r.' .
;;, ~ ~
i~
* ?
;;:~~ ; .
_ -- --- - . _ ._ _.. .. .
_-._------ - ----___. -~-- ----___------__~_.__~...
_ ~' '-., F,.~ ~ rr... ' ..._ .._. 5 i
-~-------~__°-- - .
,,_ ... ;,
1.
_~.. . _ , . _ _ ._ . ...a?,1 ~ ..U ~ .,
. .. ....:.4_.. _. si^n.e.w~~....«_..M. ..........~.......~..~...~..~~..~..~..,......~.,~~,...... _ .. ~ .........~...~.........,..~.....~ ... . r .»~. .. . . _. _ ..... _ ~ .
~.V~~ ;~ - . ~i; F
L$ . ~ . ~;~. .
f ii
..'
...'.:': ' NOW, THEREFORE,~E IT RESOLVED thet the Anaheim City Planning Cammission does herebp geant subfect
~4-'~~~" Petition for Vadance, u on tha followln coaditions whicn ere hereby fonnd to be a necesse cere uisite to the ro-
~>;. P g. ~Y P 4 P .~
posed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety aad general welfate of 4he Citizens of the City of
",,}. Anaheim.
,;;~ 1, Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1,2;3,4 and 5. ,
THE FUREGOL"IG RESOLUTION is Rigned end eppmved by me this 25th day of June, 1962.
ATTEST:
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIN! CITY PI.ANNING COMhiISSxON
SECRETARf ANAHEIM CITY PLANIJING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) se.
..__._-
CITY OF AN~lHEIhl )
I~ Ann Krebsy Secretery of the City Planning Commission of the Ciry of Anaheim, do heraby cedify that the fore-
going cesolution was passed and edopted et a meeting of ?1::; City Planaing Commission of the City oE Aaaheim, held on
June 25' 1962~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members tneceof:
~
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None. ' ~ ~
{
~i
AIISENT: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Hapgood~ Perry.
Y
IN WITNESS WHEREQF, I have hereunto set my hand this 25th day of June~ 1962. ~
'~ ~
AYES: COMI~iISSIONERS: Camp~ Chavosf Gauer, Marcoux~ Mungali, Pebley. ~
RESOLUTION NO. 380
~
;
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANHING COMMISSIOP7 ~?
_2_ .
~~ ~
~' '~
:1 ~
;;
~
~
---. _.-----.~.--- -~-----._ ____ ~r
_... ,e ;et >
- --- ~
~ ! ~