Loading...
PC 1962-1963-394.. , .. . . ,. ,, ...., _. . . . . . . . . . . . .. ,.. ~r•. ._.. . ~ ^+~,~ ~ ) • } , . _ _ - ;;",~"; ~-~ ~ RESOLUTIQN NO. 394, SFRIPS I962-63 - e `,` A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNiNG COMM:SSION OF THE C1TY OF ANAHEIM ~:'' THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCB Nd.1497 BE 7ENIED ~;;:, WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Meheim did receive a veri~ed PetiUon for Varience from " THEOD~RE J. P7ETROK, 905 Soutn Lemon Street, Attaheim, Califo•rnia, Owner of certain real prop- • - erty situated in the City of Anaheim, ~ovnty of Orange, State of California, as described in ,;:~ Exhibit "A" attached hereto and referred to herein as though set forth in full `I ;;l ; i.? f ,''~~ , end (•~ WHEREAS, the City Pianning Comn;ission did hold a public hearing et the City Hall in the City o€ Anaheim on , July 9y 1962~ et 2:00 o'clock P.hi., notlce oE said publlc headng having been duly given us required by i'`~ lew end in eccordence with the provision~ of the Aneheim Municipal Code, Chepter 18.68, to hear and conslder evidence for ;,;~ and egainst said proposed veriance end t~ investigate and make finding's end eecommencstions in connection thecewitl:; and WHEREAS, saId Commission, after due inspection, 3nvestigation, and study mede by it~elf enc in its behelf, and efter due consideration of all evidence and reports offered as seid headng, does find and deteimine Yhe following facts: ~ 1. Thet the petitioner requests a varience from th~ Aneheim Municipal Code: Section 18.32.060 t0 Complete a two story apartment building. 2. That the propcsed dPVelopment is ir:compatible with the existing single family residential development ~withinone hundred fifi,y (150) feet of subject property; and that although an error was made in checicing the hei~~ht limitation.in_GOnnection with the issuance of a building permit for the proposed construction, did not constitute waiver of the Code requirements for multiple family developments. 3. Tha+, two persons appeared in opposition to sub3ect petition, one of whom presented a petition signed by thirty-four (34) neighboring property owners opposing subject petition; that one petitionf signed by forty-two (42) neighboring residents was presented by the petitioner approving subject petition; and that two letters signed by fi~~e persons were xeceived in oppositicn to subject petition. V 1-B, -1- ,, } ~ . ._ _ _ ~ ~-- - --------- -_ . ___-- --- _. ._~~~, ..- ------ --- ~- ------- . ~! ~ , ~ -- , ~ '~ /~ ': ~ - ; '...; , +~-~-~ \ 1 ~ ,. ; ~: a:~.:, ~''~ ~" . .H.1~~ ~lS~c'~3~En ~ ~~ l. Y "V.i~:. ~u~~.~~i. ~ ~i~'~~.~.: ; ~;,;.;~,~: r; . ar,:..~~~ c:;+~:~~•. ~..:.,.,..., ~~c,,, p`; ~. f•. coo r.av.n~ ~•:..ru _rr_cr .... ,.... . ......... ...:1. ~:......,...;i,; ~~;' ,~, I~I:.1:iLii_. 'l.L.,.~ ..- .... .TU:?:: ~ ._ i ~~ ~~i ~~ . inti~o:. rn~~r \Vhcn rcplyin~ rcicr ro i'•i_ ~r11CG+.101'<: .T. »li:i:_•G)C ~ '''~! ~t-11:~.: , Our Ao. .~.~-~ ~' , gOj Sou~ki Le::~o~i . ~:nahui!:~, L'alii'orz:i:~ 1'our \'o. ~a~~ ~i~~~' "~>> 'I'hc followiny is a tcporc on thc tiUc to flic l:~n.! dc;cribcd i:ti your a~~plic.ition for a I'qlicy of T'iUc In,ura~icc, ~nd i: .:~~dc ~~~id,out liability and ~vithuut obli~;ztinn to i+su_ ,uch policy. ,; i ~` • ~: ~ Uatcd v oE_ ~_..Llt2C U~ .L~J02 at 7:30 a.m. -- -• I' - .~_.....- -.-. -•/~.--.-- J. _l. ~ ~......:~ . ..'~.i 'lltl., Gl;icnr VCSLC(:: `1'II::G:;~i',!.~ J F'ii1~.;G:i oi~~'' ~]0:... ::. :'w..i::v::, ltu:.:l;,..c~.. ~,.f~1 ,:i~,,, ~~s JO:LI7'c. LC::7~:::it:;. ~ . ~_ _ ~1 _.. S ' p , J : ~: R ; y~. ~ ~ r r'~. ,~, ~; ~ ~ ~ _~~y' ' s, ~~ • ,~ ; i! ~ :' r . „ : ;~ : . . 1 • . „ ' i ~ '} ~+. 'iI ~ I ` ~, . L I . ~ ~ I . ; ~ ~,_.__ _.., ; ___-_______________.__-____ _.___w~ . _ I , ~ 'J ~ 4 ~ ~, ~ ~,•I . 1 ti !~ ~ , . ~~ ~~ 1 ~' ~ ` ~ S ~ '' ':~ i.t ` . , ~ • ~~c. j.I~ 1 1 ,"c;l j J;, ~•f•~; _-r:._.. j `i :' t~; 1~:~Y•i:'! o:i Ci _c ~='i . j C':~ ~.1:~.i1G1:?.v CGi:C!'~ . ,.'.. a : . l. •~~.:: ., . .. ~. ~ .. .. ~ . i'i` r ~ .: .. U1 :i '..::1') pZ ?~~_ . 2 .. ._ •• . ~I 'i?: ~.. Vr_.: Cl:^ Cl ~. ~ U - `•' ..... ... .... ,._..~ii ~~ ~'U:7 i. T 1+:;:.:l~O.:'~i.' '"rr ~ ~ .~~. l.i. . . ~ . I 'IiE:,~~, ~Uj L'•L' .^.:.:i.o LI?LL '~..~? ' . . ,j i ': i:C01t~S O~ Q,1C: QZ .~';C ' i~ ~.: .. , ::~ ..~ ~. l'.~»...•~'~ ~,._...,....'1:~:~ . ...., ....."_...... 3 ~ 'rt'" ~ i~ 1J. ~~'~ ~•:7:'. /Y!D"•~i ~ _ ~+ -... ::; ~ - 1?1 ' u~ ~ ~ .L:t;':'v:: ~ 1 ~ ~ _ , ~. ;.:. ` ` ` iC! ~ ,~n,J, Y , ..~ ' ._.... . .. ~ ~ . ~.~ :'2' l,:i ~ ~_ i ~ , `.. C,: O:i U'1 .~ '1iw :Cii':~G~r, v. ~ „ i' " ~ ~ `~ ^~ ' 14 - ..,.,'y n.4. 4 .l ~~i ~ G:~ ..:.1i: :.C'!i:~~ 1::; ,,, •~i. t ~ `'` , ~` . '.. I 12'l ::Ct"`--•:i?C:~i:G ~::~. ~ '. , ~ EJ _ _ . .., ... ..,..1. ~ . • . ;. .,~ , . • ~ t _ t.: ~ .. L' i.. ~ ~}r ~.• / t~i. (l~t~ ~ ~,t?~•~•- ~.''.i lt4v_~ ~~i'' ..: . ~:5~..~:x~.~. ' _.. .... ` .... ~ . . _ / ;.l.i:i:` l.l) 4i~t. ~ ~1 . I I ~,~~:?~:i.L:LC ~~C i:c3. :, t ~. 1 _..~.`_..~ ` ._ '.. ' ~ '~]1;I7C0 C'v:!'i„?Ql''Z.i J.l.v ._ ... .•`c;J J ~', .. ~ t _~ ; ~ : ~:.~i.c c;~~r~_i~':i.c;~~;: ~ . , . ~ , _ ..,_. ~ :j 210'::l?:°.'''* .?' :i~ i. 1 - ':/ ~~ ~i ' :~.:~.'J ,..~f.~. , . .. i ~=.:tCi Ul ~:..c_1G 7:. L:3':: 1~ ,. ~ ,~ , in .. ~ ~. i S:t:iU cCiti (:~:Y'_'.J _~. ~ t :: ti ~:. ' , ~ r ~ ; I ,^.OI2i;;i~:i'~~ ~'1.:0 .. i.::.: 7;.: J_.l ~ G - ! i~. Goocic~n ra:t~l ; wi'~ _~c;;a- ,:d - . ~ .. ~,... .. . .t::;~ 'I i~s ;n c:JU C!' l::i.`'.! C?. .! ,..,y~ V ~' ~ i~.~ ~i nl• n• ~ ~ . .G.. ~^ I. ~ _.. .",.1 0.:~, C;!1i: j:1'c;~wo ~; :7; .~. 'r ~ .I :'I~SU~.. :;UA't!'.: vl~ ..~1° _~ .~. t ~. ,..... ... .,_.. . `. ..t. _ I I l.l~/~ ~. `. VV'. ~ ~ ,....J.l .. ~.. ..' ~. . ~ ~ . l_(+ ... ji~'C ti~)tl~ ~ l. l j l..i ' iA 1.:.~ t `, v^.. J ~.` . .`. . _j,: ' - .. .,j .._ . . _ ,.G >.;.;..t. _: ., .. ~.._. _. _ ..,. .. .:~J . `i i i , i. ..'r. C~. i:.:l;.:ii.: ~~ `> ... , y -' `' ' . . . ' ~ , _ ~ - i ~ v ,: ~. ,~.'v ~ ~ 7.1 ::. . ~.i. ~.~.17:1 LU Ll:i.' ~7! .iN 1~.. :1t.. I~ J1~...1i1:~'.: 'v .... ji0±'i..Lvi: v_.,,.. .... . ! ~ ::Cl .~~..,~,1C1 '- II ' . - . •_._ ~Ci710;1 :ii.:T'v~^-.j: Ofl l.:.l: ~~l.l ~~..''. V,' ~~.~~~~~- ~ «~~, ~ , ,- i "; . r 1 %~ I i -~ _ , NOW, THEREFORE, IIE 1T RESOLVED thet the Aneheim City Pianning Commissioa does he~eby deny subject Petition for Variance on the besis of the afocementioned findings. TFTE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end appraved by me this 9th day of July~ 1962. . -r-~~-~`~'~t-'~i'h?~.L ~c~~.C CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: • SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) . COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. • CITY OF ANAHEIM ) , I~ Ann Krebs, Secretery of the City Planning Commission oE the City of Aneheim, do heeeby certiEy the; the fore- going resolution wes pessed end adopted at a meeting of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim, he1.3 a~ July 9~ 1962~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M„ by the following vote of the members theceof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS:Allred, Camp, Chavos, Gauer, Marcoux, Mungall, Pebley, Perry. NGES: COMMISSIONERS: None. ABSENT: CO;NMISSIONERS: Hapgood. , IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I.have hereunto set my hend this 9th day of July~ 1962. C~~~~'i"~i "' SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSTOi1 RESOLUTION N0.394 V2-D ~ -2- `' ...... ~ 11 . `~ Y ~i 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ..... . .. . ....... .... ~- i .....- ." ~~ !1 1