PC 1962-1963-396.r
I ~ •
.
. ........... .. .... _.. ,.. .. ..._...... .. ..~~
~ ~ ' . . . . . . , .. .a. w.~~..,.,..... ..
} { `' ~ h ~~ Y
l~
RESOLUTION N0. 396, SERIES 1962-63 ,
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEiM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0, 150_ 3 gE GRANTED ,
WHEREAS, the City Plenrting Commission of the City of Maheim did receive e veri ed Petiti n for Varience
from L~N M. and MARJORIE C. WINGFIELD, 2525 Gramercy Avenue, Anaheim, ~aliforn~a, Owners;
ADD-A-ROOM CONSTRUCTION CORPORA7ION, 1777 Newport Boulevard, Costa Mesa, California, Agent
of certain real property situated.in the City of Anaheim, Couni:y of Orange, State of Cal- '
ifornia as followss Lot 95 in Tract 2118, and further described as 2525 Gramercy Avenue,
Anaheim, California
; and ,
WHEREAS, the City Pienning Commisafnn did hold a public headng at the City Hall in the City of Aneheim
on July 9~ 1962~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing heving been duly given es requirnd
by law and in eccordence with the provisions of the Aneheim hiunicipel Code, Chepter 18.68,to hear and consider ~
evidence for end against said proposed veriance and to inves~igate end meke findings and ~ecommendations in connec-
tion therewith; and '
WFIEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, invesUgation, and study mede b~ itself and 'u~ its 6ehalf,
and efter due consideratlan of all evIdence and reporte offmred es seid heering, does find c:;;l determine the following ,
facta:
1. Thet the~petitioner requests a variance from the Aneheim Municipel Code: Section 1b. 24.030 (3) to
construct an addi;;ion to an exisiting single family residence.
2. That there are exceptionel or extraordinary circumstences or conditions applicable to the property involved
or to the intended use of the property thet do not epply generally to the property or class of use in the same vicinity
and zone.
3. Thet the requested verience is necessary for the preservation end enjoyment of e substantiai property right
posseased by other property in the seme vicinity and zone, end denied to the property in question.
4. That the requested verience will not be metsrielly detrimentel to the Qublic welfere or 3njurIous to the pmp-
erty or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which ;he property is loceted.
' S. That the requested variance w;ll not adversely uffect the Comprehensive General Plen.
6• That no one appeared in opposition to subject petition.
Vl-G _1_
~
~'v?~
~
~ ,
_ .. . _._ e ~
S:c
~- ' 3
,r'„5 ~
I. .
~ ;:~. 4a .
, . •.:_ ~ ...: .......... _. _ __._. _.
----..-.. _____..._________________
. --- ____~
~~L.... . ._. . .
~p ''~1. .. .. ' .
~~. (, ~ ~~
,-
NOW, TfIEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Aneheim City Plenning Commission does hereby grent subject
Petition for Variance, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the pro-
posed use of the subject property in order to preserve tl~e safety end general welfa:e of the Citizens of the City of
Meheim.
1. De•relopment substantially in accordance ~vith Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and epproved by me this 9th day of July~ 1962. '
ATTEST:
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
SGCRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
Ci)UNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CTfY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Y.rebs~ Secretary of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certi''ry that the fare-
going resolution was passed end adopted at e meeting of the C:ity Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim, held on
July 9~ 1962, et 2:00 o'clock P M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Chavos, Gauer, Marcoux, Mungall, Perry.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Hapgood, Pebley.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hend this 9th day of July~ 1962.
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMN,ISSION
RESOLUTION N0.396
V2-G
i
~
i
... ~ ... ._ , _ ~~
-Z-
;
~
7
;
:`i
r
~?~