PC 1962-1963-410---- _ _. .._. ._. . _ __ _.._ . _ _ . _ . ... _ _ . _ _ _ ..~ _ _.._._ _.. _ ._
~; •.. ~ ~ _ __--.. , _ ~~ .
R/o,~~ ON~r GaPr -/17usr ~sc rz~ F~cEo
~ RESOLUTTON N0. 410, SERIES 1962-63 ,
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RECOMMENDING TO
THE CITY COUNCIL THAT A LAND USE POLICY BE ESTABLISHED RELATIVE TO A DELIMITATION
OF THE MAJOR COMMERCIAL-RECREATION ARHA OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND TNE MANNER BY
WHICH USES SHALL BE ESTABLISHED THEREIN.~ •
WiiEF.EAS, City Council has requested a study by the Commission for the pur-
poses of delimiting the ma~or commercial-recreation area of the City of Anaheim,
commonly known as the "Disneyland Area"; AND •
WHEREAS, the Commiss~on did conduct a~study of said area; AND
WIiEREAS, said study verifies the unique local,•regional and national
recreational significance of this aree and the need for careful review of every use
established therein; AND
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim is undertaking ;;
the formulation and adoption of a general plan of land use, and is presently review-
ing and preparing amendments to .the Anaheim Zoning Ordinance, said General Plan and
amendments to be discussed at public hearings within a reasonable time; AND
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT in order to protect the public health, safety, and
general welfare of the City of Anaheim, a land use policy, be established in order i
to safeguard the continued orderly development of the commercial-recreation area, ~
commonly known as the "Disneyland Area", as delimited on Exhibit No. 1; AND j`
. ~ i
THAT,the special use nature of the "Disneyland Area", the continued orderly `
development of which is found to be basic to the community's economic health and gen- '~
eral welfare, requires the estahlishment of such safeguards and conditions which will
encourage and promote the continued orderly development of said area for commercial- ~~
recreation and tourist-related type uses; AND
THA7,in order to provide the necessary review and the establishment of ~
conditions which will insure the continued compatibility of land uses, all applications
for uses of land in such commercial-recreation area as delimited on Exhibit No. 1
and/or the preliminary General Plan shall be by Conditional Use Permit only; AND
THAT, the establishment of Petail businesses, offices and other non-recreational ;
or tourist related uses should be limited to those wh3.ch are integrated tivith and customarily ~
incidental to the operation of a primery use complex, where the intent is to serve the
customers or guests of such primary use rather thar~ the general.public; AND ,
. THAT, as an ad3unct area having substantial importance with respect to the
commercial-recreation area as delimited on the preliminary General Plan that all
requests for land use on Harbor Boulevard from said commercial-recreation area south ;
to Chapman Avenue be established by Conditional Use Permit only; AND
THAT, this policy shall remain in full fcrce and effect until such time as
this area is properly incorporated into an adopted comprehensive General P1an and
properly provided for in an adopted comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, or until such
time as the City Council may provide. ~
_. '~ ,1
~
_ ~_~.__._ ~
„~ -
.~.,,...~,,:.,..:_.~~:,~-.._~~...~.__~-----~..__ .._._...M..~..,....,,._..~.,........n~_..,..,...,._._...w.....___.,_
::~'~ ~
`~ \.. ~~.'• ~ ~
i' ;
. ,.
, ~:
, ~
, . ; ,:
. • i~
• ~
' THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 9th day'of ;;~
~ July, 1962. I '<
. , ;
i
t'~/7'h,~ i 1
~ '.'
CHAIR N ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISS ~ j;
• c
: ;i
ATTEST: ,
, , I
~ . • ~ :i
/~ ~,u
I .
`~~2~'~° r- ~ .r . . . ~ ~,
; '~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CI Y PLANNING COMMISSION I;:;
i '
i y
STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ' ~ ' ~
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) gs .
CITY OF ANAHEIM ) , ~ , ~~ ,,r
I, ANN KRE9S,-Secretary of the City Planning Commission nf the City of .-~
Anaheim, do hereby certify that the'foregoing RESOLUTION N0. 410, SERIES 1962-63, ~
was passed and adopted~by a motion duly made, seconded and carried, at a Re,gular
Meeting•of the City Planning Commission held on the 9th day of July~ 1962. ''-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I1have hereunto set my hand this 9th day of July, 1962. ,.,5
. ~
.~
. ' i~G/`s/~/ '} .
. SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ':c
~ • :a
. ~ :,;
, ;,#
4
i
~ '
; i~
y~;,:;
C:_ '_..
~~. ; "~ ~: '~
~ RFSOI.UTI~N NOa 410, SERIES 1962-63
*timended bv Resolution Noe83_~., Series 1963-64, dated July l9 1963>
'
1 ' A RESOI.UTION OF THE CITY PIANNIi~ CQ~dISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RECONAAEt~IDING TO THE CITY
.
`:;;;I' COUNCIL THAT A LAND USE POLICY BE ESTABLISHED RELATIVE TO A DELIMITATION aF THE MAJOR ;
~';'} COMMERCIAL-RECREf~TIOR AREa OF THE CITY OF..ANAHEIM AIVD THE MANNER BY WFIICH USES SHAI.L BE ;
;~''
;,;;~: ESTABLISHID THEREINo
ti,,.
,
WHEREAS, the City Council has r3quested a study by the Comr.~ission for the purposes of
~
,. delimiting the major commercial~recreation area of the City of Anaheim, commonly known as the
"Disneyland Area"$ and
WHEREAS, the Commission did conduct a study of said area; and ; .
WHEREAS, said study verifies the unique localy regional and national recreational sig-
~
nificance of this area and the need for carexul revi~w of every use e$tabl3shed therein; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the Cit'y of Anaheim is undertaking the formu-
lation and adoption of a general plan of land use, anol is psesently reviewing and preparing
amendments to the Anaheim Zoning Ordinance, said General Plan and amendments tu be discussed
at pu~lic hearings tvithin a reasonable timeo
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RE50LVED9 that in order to protect the public heal.th9 safety, and ~
i
general welfaxe of the City of Anaheimg a land use policy9 be established in order to safe-
guard trie continued orderly develooment of the commercial-recreation areaq commonly known
as the "Disneyland Area", as delimited on E~ibit Noa 1~ and _
;veT ~;;o a„o~iai ~~e nature ~f the "Disneyland Area", the continued ordexly develop-
ment of which is found to be basia to the community's economic health and generai weiiare9 -
requires the ostablishment of such safeguards and conditions which will enccurage and p*omote r
the continued orderly development of said araa for commercial-recreation and ~ourist-related
type useaq and . _
THAT, in order to ~rovide the necessary review and the establishment of conditiona which
will insure the continued compatibility o~ land usae, a11 applicatione for usea of land in
and/or the preliminery General
1~
hibit 1Vo
E
d :.
l
,
o
on
x
such comnercial-reereation area as delimite
Plan sha3,1 bb by conditional use permit only~ and ^<.
TFYAT9 •the eetabliehment of retail busin$saes9 offioes and other non-recrea~tional or tour-
iat r~lated uses shou)d be limited ~o thoso which are in~egratad with and cti~ai:omarily inciden-~
tial to ~he operation of a primary use complox9 where the intent ie to serve the customers or
gueats of such primary uee rather than the genesal publicj and .
THAT, in order to encou:age and ~rovide for the year long utilization of ~the restaurants, ,
hotels, mo~ela9 copvention and other apeciai facilf~ies and attractions, and in order to ;;
encourago and prbvid~e for'thb highest utilization of freeway fxontage locatfona end the ..
comm,~tnity benefits derived ~h6refxom9 business and professionaY office buildinga may be per- ;
mit'ced in the commercial-recreation erea on those sites having freeway fxontage loc~tionsj ~s
where the intent is to establieh a headquartere sharaplace of regional ox national scapo and ;
'
impoxtance; where tl~e intent is to develQp a multi-story facility with a minitt~um of three :~~
storles on a minimum three net acre sits, and whore the structural design and site development "t
`` is cons~steriti wi.tlv the dyneanic character of the tat~rist and conventian relatad commero~el- ,;
~ recreati6h s~aao Faoilities complyin~ ~vith the abvve prQrewisites eha~l be considerad a pri- z
mary usE~ wiznin tine ifl~en~ c~ this rasclutior.; an~ : `
}
TH,4T, as an ad3unct area having su~stantial importanca with respoct to the commarcial- ~
1L~1 11 '~'w ~vi i~::~ 1~~~ ~~
recreation area as delimited on tne preiiminary uennTai Piar, ~~~a~ Hai ra.;a~a~..
Harbar Boulevard from said commexcial-recreation area south to Chapman Avenue be established
:
by cor~~iitior.al use perni~t on1yY and . , ;
THAT, this policy sha.ll remain in full force and effect until euch time as this area is ;
~ propexly incorporated into an adopted comprehensive General Plan and properly provided:for in _ ~
~.,.,_-
,.
~ an adopted comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, or until such time as the City Council may provfdeo ~X
~
;
f: (Revised 8-20-62) .!a
~ tn ~. ' • ~;~
.`,i,: , -1- , , ; ,
{`' #Amended.by Resolution Noo 83~, Series 1963-649 Paragra~`h 109 by the substitution of "business
ervice
di
t
" ;~
: rec
s
where no
and professional" for "national headqua*ters", and tFle deletion of ;,,;
~
~,
IL '~
~~ pT- S81pn~ ~.m+ov3dad~!_.. .._._~ -- -^°--- ^ - '_' --'.`._ -__._._• .
~ . . . . .. . , . .. . ,- ,
~.~ . . ~
-y
--- - ..
.'f '
i ~~.~;~
1
~
~,„~-~ _
_. ~'-::1. . . . . 4~•.R~ ^
~ ____.
~;~
.__... _ .__
_,~
~, t
r
'~z
~3
~
~" ~` ~.`t
` ~
~r ,?i
J
?;
'i
THE FOREGOING RESOLilTION is signed and approved by me this 9tY~ day of July9 19620
l/f~ • e`v~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PI.ANNING COAM7ISSION~
ATTESTt
SECRETARY' At3AHEIM CITY PL,~NNING CON9ulISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORAhGE j sse
CITY OF ANANEIM )
I9 Ann Kreba9 5ecretary of the Ci~:y Planning Co~nmiesion of the City af Anahoim9 do hereby
certify that the foregoing RESOLUTION NOo 410p SEI2IES 1952-63, v~as paesed and adopted by a
motion duly made, seconded and carsisda at the Regular Moeting of the City Planning Commiseic
held on the 9th day of 31a1y9 1962,
IN WITNES^a WHEREOF~ I have hereunto set my h~na this 5~h day of Julyo 1962a
~~~'sY~'w~
SEC:~ETARY AAIAI?zT11 CITY ALANNIt~ CON4VITSSION
RPSOLUTI013 N0. 410
(Revised 8-20~f,2)
-2~
r;
~
t~ ;<
~ it.l`::
fi . . '. '.'_ ' . . 1 . _-__..._ -' ~
S' , A
~,_. .. - ~ ,
y~ • ( ~~„{
`, ~ .~
RESOLUTION N0.-410` SF~IES 1962-63
A RESOL[YTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY UF ANAHEYM
RECOMMENBING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT '
PETITION POR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 61-62-111 BE DEP7IED ~
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim did receive a verified Petition for Recla'ssifica- '
tioafrom BENJAMIN DABULIS et al, 2504 Orange Avenue, Anaheim, Galifornia, Owner; THB~DORE E.
PEARSON, 1855 West Elm Avenue, Anaheims.California, Agent of certain real property situated
in the City of Anaheim,.Couttty of Orange, State of California, described as follows:~rcelNo.ls
Westerly 90 feet of.Lot 1 of Tract Noo 796, in the City uf Maheim, as shown on a map thereof
recorded in book 24, page 28, Miscellaneous Maps~ records of sa3d Orange County. PARCEL NOo 2s
The West 90 fee~ of. Lot 3 of Tract No. 796, in the City of Anaheim, as shown on a map thereof
recorded in book 24, page 28, Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange County. PARCEL NOo 3:
The North 467 feet of Lot 1 in Block A of Tract No. 796, as shown on a map thereof recorded
in book 24t page 28, Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange Countyo Also an easement
over said land for ingress and egress, as gr mted to Freda Vorhies, in deed recorded Ap.ril
22, 1930, in book 370, page 498, Off icial Records
' ; and
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commissioa did hold a public hearzng at the City Hall •in the City of Aneheim on
July 23~ 1962~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hesring having been duly given as required
by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Aneheim Mucicipal Code, Cheptec 18.72, to heaa end consider evi-
dence for ead ageinst said propased .~eclassiflication and to investigete and meke findinge and cecommendetions in
connection thecewith: and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study mede by itself end•in .its behelf,
and after due consi3eration of all evidence and seports oEfered at seid hearing, does find end determine the following
facts:
1. Thet the petitioner p:oposes a redassification of the above described pmperty from ffie R-A~ Residential
Agricultural, Zone to the R-3, Multiple Family Residential, Zone, to construct a planned
unit multiple family residential developinento ,
2. That the proposed reclassification of subject property is not necessary and~or
desirable for the orderly and proper development of the communityo
3. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does not property relate
to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in close proxfmity to subject
property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally established throughout the
oo~rnnun ity.
4o That the area in which subject property is located is proposed for Single Family
Residential development under the proposed General Plan, and that the proposed use would be
incompatible to theipropased use by such a deviation from the General Plan.
5. That the ~pplicant twice had been requested to submit revised plans, that the hearing
had been postponed t~wice in order to permit the petitioner time to submit said revised
plans, that ihe revised plans as submitted do not meet the standards as set for multiple
family developments, and that to deny said petition would not be depriving the petitioner
of any rights which any other property owner in subjECt area was granted.
Rl-D -1-
~ 3~ - ~a.r~?. . . • . . ~ ~ ~ . . . ------
-. - .. . .....~ . ~. . ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ . .
,r
.
~ ,~
3
°'~ i
`~~ !
I
i
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thbt the Aneheim City Plnnning Commission does heceby recommend
to the City Council of the City of Aneheim thet subject Petition fot Reclussificetion be denied on the besis of the
eforementioned findings. ~
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 23rd day of July~ 19620
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST: ~
.~~'Z~/ •
,
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs~ Secretary of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim, 'do hereby cedify that the fore-
going cesolution was passed and adopted et a meeting of the City Plenning Commission of the City oE Aneheim, held on
July 23~ 1962~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members the:eof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:Allred, Camp, Chavos, Gauer, Marcoux, Mungall, Pebley, Perry.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSGNT: COMMI55ICNERS: Hapgoodo
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 23rd day of Julyy 1962a
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0.410
R2-D -2-
----~` ---- - ~