PC 1962-1963-413~~:.'~~.'. ~ .l.'`; I ~ } :_i
~
1 ~ :' t
~ 9 T..
~. ~ . _~ .. ~ i ~` + ~`
. . ~ ~:~
~.~
, :R ~
~~ RF.SOLUTIOl~G0.413, SFRIES 1962-63 { y
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLP*?NING COMMISSION OF iHE CITY OF ANAHEIIH
THAT PETiTdON FOR VARIANCE N0. 1505 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Ci4y Planniag Commiesion of the City of Anaheim did receive e ved$ed Petition for Vedance
E%m JAMES G. HULL, 1604 East Elm, Anaheim, California, O~mer of certain real property
situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California and described as
follows:• Lot No. 90 in Tract No. 1770, and further described as 1604 East Elm, Ar.aheim,
California
; and
WHEREAS, tlie City Pleaning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hell 9n the City of Aaaheim
~ July 23' 1962~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public headng having been duly given ee required
b~ laA aad ia accordence with fhe provisions of the Maheim Municipel Code, Chepter 18.68, to heareutd eoneider
evidease for ead ageinst seid proposed verIence end to inves~igete and molce findings end recommendatioas ia connec-
tloa t~erewlth; end
WHEREAS, sald Commieaion, after due inspection, inveatigetion, end study mede by itself and ia its behelf,
aa@ after dae coasidorntion of ell evideace and zepods offered se seid headng, does find and deteemine the following
toets:
1. Thnt the;petitioner requeate e vedonce from the Anaheim Muaicipal Code: Section 18.24.030 (3) to
construct an addition to an existing single family residence.
2. That there aee exceptionel oe e:trnordinery ciecumstsnces or conditions applicable to the propecty involved
or to the intended uae of the property thet do aot epply generelly to the property or cless of use in the aeme vicinity
end aone.
3. Tha4 the tequeated variance is necessery for the preservation and enjoyment of a substenfiel p:operty dght
pwseated by oEher propetty in the aeme viciairy end zone, end denied to the property in question.
4. ?het the requested varieace wiftl not be materially detrimentel !o the publlc welfete or injudous to the pmp-
eety oe impmvemente in such vicinity aad zone in which the property is located.
' S. Thet the cequeeted varience w~ll not adversely effoct the Cooprehensive Generel Plen.
6. That no one appeared in opposition to subject petition.
~~ Vl-G
~-
' -1-
. _ - _ .,. •. -~ ~t -1 ------ ~
~~
~ ~.
~. :.~,
~_
i • '- • t
E NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT R~~fOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning C"ommission does hereby grant subject
` l~etition for ~/arience, upoa the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary pre:equisite to the pro-
4 pased use of the subject property in order to pceserve the sefety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of
~ Ac~eheim.
,
i~ 1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2.
;~ .
E
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION ie signed end epproved by me thie 23rd day of July, 1962.
CHAIRhfAN ANAHEIM CiTI PLANATING COMMISSIO
~ ATTEST:
/ '~e~C~v
SECRETARY AP?ATiEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
S'Y'ATE OF CALIFORIv"IA ) •
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CTfY OF ~NAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs~ Secretery of the City Plamung =ommission of Qhe City of Aneheim, do hereby certify thet the fore-
going reaoluUon was passed and adopted at e meeting of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on
July 23~ 1962~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members ffiercof:
AYES: COINMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Chavos~ Gauer~ Marcoux, Mungall, Pebley, Perry.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None. •
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Hapgood.
IN WITNrSS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hend this 23rd day of July~ 1962.
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLAIv'N1NG COMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0.413
V2-G -2-
~,;, ~„~ h , , ___-_
. ._ ~ ~ 1 ' ~ ~