PC 1962-1963-419:~
~y, ~ .,.~,,..r ~,~~.::~M,x,. _.._. ».~~,..,.,__ ~....~.~..._.........Y.. _..... _ __..~.~._._.._____._.....,_ , s~..,_......,.~r.., ~~.~ ,.1 ,... ~,.. , .
4
.' •~ ~ RESOLUTI~h~ NO, 419> SERIES 1962-63 ~.~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNENG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
TFiAT PETdTION FOR CONDITIONAI, USE PERMIT 273 BE GRANTED
~ PIHEREAS, the City Plenaing ^• .,issioa of the City of Maheim did recelve e verified Petition for CondiUanel `j
Use Pecmitfrom ROBERT S. UNGEr 108 East Lincoln, Anaheim, California, Owner; WILLIAM ~
i~ YrOLSBORN, 1741 Euclid Street, xnahe~3m, California, Agent of certain real property situated ~~
in.the.City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows; The 4
East 230 feet of the West 345 feet of that portion of Lot 16 of the P. A. Stanton Tr.act,
:_•_: as shown on a map thereof recorded in Book.5, pages 23 and 24, Miscellaneous Maps, records
~ of said Orange County, lying South of the South line of the North 1 acre of said lot '
~~ ;
; end
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commiasioa did hold a public headng at the City Hall in the City of Meheim on
July 23~ 19b2' at 2:00 o'clocl: P.M., notice of seid public heedng having been duly given ea required by
law ead in accordence with the provlsions of the Anxheim Municipal code, Chepter 18.64, to hear end coasidxr evidence
for and agt~inst seid proposed coaditional use and to investigate and meke findinga end recommendetions in connection
thetewith; and
WHEREAS, seid Commission, efter due inspect;on, investigation, end study'mede by itaelf and in ita behelf, and
after due rnnsideration of ell evideace and repoets offered at said headng, does find end determine the following fects:
1. 'lhat the proposed use is properly one for which a Conditionel.Use Permit is authodzed by this Code, to
wit: establir,h a multiple family planned unit residential development.
2. Thet 61e propoaed use will not edversely affect the adjoining land uses snd the growth and development of
the erea in whlch itis proposed to be loceted.
3. Thet the size ead shepe of the site propoaed for the uae is adequeta to allow the fu11 development oE tha
ptoposed use ia a menner not detrimentel to the particuler area nor to the peace, health, aefery, and genewl welfere
of the Citizens of the City of Meh~im.
4. Thet the granting of the Conditional Use Permit under the conditions Impased, if any, will not be detrimentel
to tho peace, health, saEety, aad general welfeie of the Citizens of the City of Aneheim.
5. That th2 traffic generated by the praposed use will not impose an undue burden
upon the stxeets and highways designed and improved to carry the ~raffic in the area.
6. That no one appeared in opposition to subject petition.
> ' ~ Cl-G
~
~
._ .-.~ ~~.
~
i
a
i
~
.M.,,,..r,~a.,...r...Y,._...~..~.._.,.~...,.__._...,....n._~_~Q..,~M.~.y.w.~_._..~....w_d.........._...A ,~.,~..,,~..~.... ,. , ..-, . .
~~ ~~- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT~k~SOLVED thet the Maheim ~ity Planning'i>ommission does hereby grent sub9ect
Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon the following conditions which ace heieby found to be a necessary pre~equisite
to the propoaed use of the subjeck pxopetty in order to presecve the safety and general welfece of the Citizens of the
City of Aneheim: •
1. Dedication of thirty-two (32) feet from the monumented centerline of Winston Road
(10 feet existing).
2. Preparation.of stree~ improvement plans ana installation of all improvements
for Winston Road subject to the a~~proval of the City Engineer and in accordance with the
adapted standard plans on f ile in the off ice of the City Lngineer.
. 3r Payment of $2.Q0 pEr front foot for street lighting purposes on Winston Road.
4. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of ~25.00 per dwelling unit to be collected
as part of the Building Permit.
5. Provision of trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public Works,
Sanitation Division, which are adequate in size accessible to trash-truck pickup and
adequately enclosed by a solid fence o:~ wall prior to Final Building Inspection.
6. Subject to the approval of petition for Reclassification No. 61-62-122.
7. Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180) days :ar the accomplishmnnt of
Item Nos. 1, 2, and 3.
8. ~Developm=nt substantially io accordnace with Exhibit No. 1.
9. Provision of a six (6) foot masonry wall on the west and east boundaries of
subject property in order to.maintain a residential integrity of the development and to
protect the abutting properties to the east and to the wast of subject property.
10, Provision that the interior walls of the proposed carports shall be stuccoed,
or that a block wall on the rear of the proposed carports shall be substituted with the side
walls beie;g stuccoed, that enclosed storage cabinets shall be provided along the rear wall
of each carport~ and that adequate bumper guards shall be provided to protect the interior
wall of the proposed carports from damage.
11. Provision of fire hydrants as required by the City of Anaheim Fire Department.
THE FURPGOING RFSOLUTTON is signed and~approved by me this 23rd day of July, 1962.
7
CSAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISS
ATTEST:
~I/~/ ~~~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ae.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs~ Secretery of the City Planning Commission of 4he City of Aneheim, do hereby cedify thet the
fa~egoing cesolutian wes pessed and adopted at a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim,
held on July 23~ 1962~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the followIng vote of the memUers thereof:
AYFS: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Chavos, Gauer, Marcoux, Mungall, Perry.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Hapgood, Pebley.
IPF WITNESS WHEREOF, I havehereunto set my hand this 23Td day of July~ 1962.
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLU'TION NO. 419
C2-G
-Z-
~ ; , . -- ,,,
. . ~
~
~ ' ~
r. ~.._. _. .. ..., _ _. .. ... , .. . x~-