PC 1962-1963-443........,a.~ ... ~.:._ , ,,_,.,..,~__.~.:-..,,, .,,.~.,
----._.,,..-: : :., ,.,. :_ . .
. , _ . : _.~ :_. .
. :. .-- „., . .-.~. . __
r _..._.._.
g
+ ~ -~.......; ~ ~
[ , ~~v
RESOLUTIOIV N0.443y SERIESy 1962~63
t
jf .
Y~ A RESOLUTION OF TfiE CI'TY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF~ANAkEIM
i RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COVNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM'THAT
~ i PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 62-63~12 gE DENI~D ''
~ WEIEREAS, the City Plenning Commiseion of the City of Malieim did receiv~ e vadfied Petition for Recla'ssiflca-
tlon fcom' 1gp}(NE R, DAVID6QNg 1769 West IIroariway, Anaheim, California, Owner of ce'rtain real
property situated in the City of Anaheim, Cownty of Orangep State of California, as described
in Exhibit "A" attached hexeto and rsferred to hereln as though set farth in full .
~ ~
; end
WHEP.EAS, 4he C!ty Plenniag Commission did hold a public heating at the City Hell •in the City o~ pnaheim on'•
August 6y 1962s at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notlce of aai~ public hearing having been duly given ae reqi~ired'
by law end in eccordance with the provieioas of the Anaheim Muaicipel Code, Cheptar 18.72,to heae and~conaider evi-
denae foe aad againet aeid propeeed reclaeeificetion end ta inveatigate end meke $nding~ end recod~aienda~ioae ia
connection therewlth: end
AIHEREAS, aeid Commiesion, after d~e iaepecRion, iriveetigatlon, ead study meda by itdalf en~ in ite ba6alf,
end efter due conei3eretion of ell evidence end repoda offered at seid hearing, doea find aad dete~ine.the following
fecte: '
1. Thet the pedtioner proposas a reclasaification of the abova described peoperty fro~ the R-A' R.esitlential
Agricultural,. Zone to the R~-3y Multiple Faanily Residential~ 2ona to construct an Qig!it unit
multiple family planned nnit dAValopmento •
2o Thnt the.pro}~osed reclessif.ication of sub~~ct ~roperty 3s not necegsary and/or
desirabla far the orderly and.prcper.development of the communityo
,3a That the proposed development was not compatible with the sfngle family land uses
in the.areraa
4o That the petitionar would not.be deprived of any riyhts not afforded to otlier
resider,is in the areaa and that no physical change ir, the proper$y was ;app~ren+. to warrant
gsanting of said petitlono
5o That the petitioner planned to utilize the home within a proposed R-3 zone~ which
would th~an require siRgle story constxuction of said development* and that said home would
not be aersthetically compa~ible with the proposed Multiple ~amily developmenta
6~~ That nineteen ,(19) persons appeared ~n opposition to subject peti~ion, one of whom
pre§ent~ad e petitiar of opposition signed by th;i~y-seven (37) property oW-ters in the vicinity
of subject property o ~
,. i
~_ ._..-_...~__---___
~ ~ , .
Y~ YO ~.Op . .
~
~
f
' ~.
i ~ .
E
---------------
;r. , ._ _. _.._ __ . __ _ _ . _
_ ~+~ I'' ~~ . 1.,)
)i i f~:,.. , .
• o~.~
~ ~~ '~`i~e ~sux~ce a~.c~. ~'rust ~~~~a.~~ . .
• eJ~.~::sce cc~•rrn• ~:z:.;•;c~•: '• '
' ttoo oaoRZta uttot xtr.rct + r•.~•. a~:~: r.. ..:,r::.~ .v,:,, ~cr,t:r.,: i::a
..
~ ~ ~ ' . l11d3~Kt~H 'T.L:C:
' L TU June 22, 1962 •
. ~ . ~1~1 ~1JL3~ 1 t't;~» . IriiPORTANT '
~ lYllicn rcplpi:i~ rcfcr to
Toner Rra?ty T;aerow Depart:~en~ ou~ rro.3.3?05~-~3~
,5401 i;ast C~rson Boulevard
. Long I3cach, Ca2ifornia ~~ 6,~_~ Z
. , ~ Your No.::u~ze R, i~avldson
Attn: O,~rtrude Ca~pbell •
-, Thc following is a report on thc titlc tv thc land dcscribcd in your applica6on for n Policy of Tide Insurancc,
~ and is madc without liability and witnout obligation to issuc such polity. .
• Dabed as of__ June 13, 1962 ' •~t 7:30 a,m.
, }3ob Pezin r~ao oiu~o~
Vatcc: , . -
..
:~lAYAJT; R. DAVIDSON and MARy K. D1IVIDSOhr, huaband and t•rire, •
'" ' ua Jo3nt tanr~nts. '
____..- ..'-----_._. - . Y .._....~_. .._.._.,_M.,__._..._..._.._._.~.__..._..~__,______,.~._._..___._._
~• ..-~ .., :. ., : ...~ ,: ~ -
,. , .;~-~ ~ ,.
• . 332c5{:-r.C~
: ~uL ~ortio~ o~ tiia ~:r:~t• li~1S o~" L-3i~ no•r~Choa.:L qu.•r~er u~'
'' L~iC T10T't22C~;,,^,Z'. C1L1~T~L•cr aS .^.CC~:j.0i1 .I.~r~ 1'G:•1:1:..~'t:LTi 1~r ~O111:27~
Sii~..Cl[~O 7.0 j'iCuL`~ 'l.rt it~ ~:.:::1L'i~rJ ap:3 L'U;ipi:C`J~ C6UfI'i.1`f O? l7l';:i:";:~~
' ` f3~~{:C O~' Ca.~.'1.~`02'i1'~.~,~ C.`~ ut1Gi:4'1 Ci"1 Il L"~:.7 T'CC.'~.:'G~i'tC~ :'t~l I~C4;: j.L
~.' ~`,~~;C ~~ Or 1`'iI.IICC1.1~1t2COi;S i~:21'~,'1:79 :'L:1 {:::C Q'~'1.`:'.CC Oi ~i:C COL'l,i:; f
rcCO~er oS' Jaid co~nt;~, c:e~ci~ibcd ~~ fo'! Io:r~:
~:f'.r~nin~ ~.'~ ~-~I'~ intcrcca~~o7 c~ ~1~~ ~co:.~cr.~ line o~ ~r-c:r1:•:r.,;
, •. ::5~:1 ~.1~ s~u4Chcr].;f nro~.c;~,~~i~n o~ '~l•ic i?<z;;'~ ?: r~e o_° 1.cL; ~1
, , ~u.~J.Vt~ ~~ t'F• ~ ~• +~f-rr
' ~".O ~~.T:C 11L~.CC4 i0. ,7Jac'_s c.,3 ~.J:7!Ti::1 D:! A I?~~i 3.'JC'C_'Cl~'
ed 1n uoo?c 123 ~~.r;-~ t~-, d 1~1, ;-~; ;., ~ .~ ; „ ,,~ , ..~.. _ .
~ v$ r> iZY'i v Ol l: .., i•~.:.^.C~.~.A . U~.~ t~+c~. ~.~ ~
. 'i.i1G'IYCC riQl'f;tl ~~ Q~f !'.~" L'd.^.:,i: ;~'F j.GJ iCCL C~~! i:c~ ~ L'~? Ci ::~~'i.l>-
e~~.r ~~oion~~~.o:~ una .^.~wd ~..aL- '_i::e `co •i,1zc ~.cL:;;a 3.i;~c o_"
. ~ 1ot:3 11, ~ o Z7 3~zcxuo:Lvc ~t s~.ic? '_'x~azct ::o. ;;;~:i~; ~1:cc:cc
I ~Oi21if2 t~7~° ~~ ~'Jn S-.'.~'c:lr~i Zj>..r.Y~ 1.'C'Cv 4 ~O~lv .^..^s..'t.C2 i'OL?i:~2 ~.j.1:E.`~
~henc~ w ou~Ii Q° 00 < <EL"' laa,°L ,0."f~. :i..c~ ~~~~~~~? 7 ~? ~: •~h : , _~
• ~ :i!.~^.K~'+ ~.~.P.C j ~:1'1Ci1CC ~'Gili::l +'rj" s`~..G ~ i3~~ ~•~f.':;'G .~~.~. ( j =GCi: ~ i:3iC•1]C:~.
' . PIO~:t2 ~i9° 33~ ^2" '(:v~~ ~.01~ iCC~; i:Z~~nc~ ~~trciz ~" CO' QZ
~ 7?5531: V. JJ f`C~2j:; otilence ~~OUi::`1 1t,~'y° ~.J f rJ" ~.'C:J'i. ~~•;j %? L'Ci: ~
, ~:hcr.c~~ :~or~;i t39 33' 3~" ~:c: ~ ?3.~z; x'cr.~ pc:r~i7,c3. ~;iL~ia ..~. :1
' cenL-cr 11na; ~l:ence ~ou~li a" 00' 1;<>" '~..^~~ '!3? .t70 °~:e~ ~.~°~~1?_
el vrd.~h a~.d ~a~L- I.~.r.e to ~~:~.c~ a~n;ei~ ?l::ry; ~Lcr.ce ~:artI= ;i~° .
~~ ~` ~ ~ 33' 3?° T~:e:~~ S~.G~ ~ceL 'i.0 'I:ilE P0~.12~ o~ ~e~;:r.ni~.:Lr_g, ,
S^.~.~ 1.an~t it3 irtcltzded t~ri'clz3.n «;Y~.~ ~:.~a :: Tou:a a~ a:~.~p ~~.cci
~~~ ~ n boa~c 5~ p~,e 2xb a~' ~aoor,~ os Sc~,'•ryve~;~~,, .,.n L}.~ ai:;"i~c c,
~a1d cai;n~y rvcord~,r. '
i ' n ~~
~`
~~~~
1
~
i
t
i
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Maheim City Planaing Commission does hereby cecommend
to the City Council of the City of Aneheim thet subject Petition for Reclassificetion be denied on the basis of the
eforementioaed findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION ia signed end epp:oved by me this 6th day of August9 19620
ATTEST:
. ~
CHAI AN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNtNG COMMISSION ~
~~r~~CJ ~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM GITY PLAi~INING COMMISSION ,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I9 AnR Krebs' Seccetery of the City Planning Commission of the City of Maheim, 'do heceby cectify that the fore-
going cesolution wes passed end adopted at e meeting of the City Plenning Commission ofthe City of Anaheim, held on
August 6y 1962y at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vate of the membecs the:eof:
AYES: COMMISSI013ERS: Camp9 Chavos4 Gauer9 MarcoUx, Mungall, Pebley9 Perryo
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Nonea
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Hapgoodo
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my head this 6th day of AugustQ 1962,
: ~~2~%~''~~,~ 'c..~i ` "' .
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY pLANNING Cf";~MISSION
~'~ RESOLUTION NO. 443
i~. .,-~,.,,- 4
R2-D
~
; ~
~
~
~ - -•- --- ,.
~. ~_-,-^~_----• - . . ~ ' 4 y ~ '
.2.
~..._...... . _ . _
_-__-~ ----------...__ - -------- __-