PC 1962-1963-458r .
. ~,
.~ RESOLUTIO~NO. 4589 SFtIES 1962-63 w~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLA.NNIDTG COIr4~SISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEI6!
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 1517 BE GRANTED
WHBREAS, the City Planning Commissioa of the City of Aaeheim dlid receive e verified Petition for Varieace
fmm HELMER M. HOFF~ JRr.~ 2231 Falmouth, Anaheim, California, Owner of certain rea2 property
situated in the City of Anaheim~ County of Orange, State ~of California, as followsc Lot Noe
122 in Tract 2201~ and further described as 2231 Falmouth, Anaheim, California
; aad
WHEREAS, the City Plenaing Commiesion did hold a publlc heering at the City Hall in the City of Anafieim
on AuguSt 20~ 1962, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public hearing having beca duly givm as reqaired
by law end in eccordance with Nie provisions of the Aaaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.58,to hear aad coasider
ovidence for end egeinat aeid proposed verlence aad to iavestigate eud meke Sadings and recommendetioas in conneo-
tlon therewith; ead
VYHERcAS, said Commiseioo, eftcr due iaspectlon, investigetion, end study made by itself aa~ wo its behelf,
an3 eftec due conaideraUon of all evidence aad repoxts offered es seid heaeing, dces find aad detecmi::e ifie following
facta:
1. That the petitioner requesta e varlence from the Aneheim Municipel Code: Section 18e24.030 (3) to
construct a room addition to an existing single family residence.
2. That there em eaceptionel or extraotdit-ary dreumstaaces or caaditions applicable to the pmperty involved
or to the intended use of the property thet do not epply generally to the progecty or dass of nse in the same viciaity
end zone. .
3. That the roquested varieace is necessary for the presecvetion ead enjoymeat of a snbstantiel pmpe~q right
possessed by other property in the same vlclnity end zone, end deaied to the propecty ia qaestion.
4. Thet the requested verieace mill not be metedelly dettimental to the public welfate or iajnrions to the ~op~
eety or impmvements in such viciniry end zone in which the pmperty is loceted.
~ 5. Thet the requested verIenas will hot edvereely a~ect the Comprehmsive Geaerel Plan.
G, That tto one appeared in opposition to sub~ect petitione
Vl-G ~ -1-
_.--- _.~_______------___._______..----___..._,..~_v____...~..M_... ___.___._.__..~_ _.
r. _ _. ___ . __ .. _ _ _----- -__------__.. _
~
1~; ~ •
4 ' ~ , •~ ,
~: { ~ ~ ~)
f:: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim CIty Planning Commission does hereby grant subject
;f; Petition for Varience, upon the following conditions which e~e hereby found to be a necessary pcerequisite to the pro-
„ posed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and generel welfece of the Citizens of the City of
AnaheIm.
~~ 1. Development substantially in accordance wi±h Exhibit No. 1.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is aigned and epproved by me this 20th day of August~ 19620
ATTEST:
~!~~YV ~~i u~,,~P/
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CIT`1 PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) •
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) es.
C1TY OF ANAHEIM j
Iti Anh Krebs~ Sectetery of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do hereby certify thet the fore-
going iesolution wes pesaed and adopted at a meating of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on
August 20~ 1962~ at 2:00 a'ciock P.M., by the following vote of the membecs thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONE:RS: Camp~ Chavos, Gauery Marcoux, Mungall, Pebley, Perryo
NaES: COMMISSIONERS: None. •
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Hapgood. '
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 20th day of August~ 1962.
RESOLUTION NO. 458
V2-G
CHAIRMAN ANAHExM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
J
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-2-