PC 1962-1963-497;~
. .~'` -~.-
r~~ ~: ~
RESOLUTI~N N0. 497~ SERIES 1962-63
\ z~:?: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAf~EIM
`'rv` ` RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH C~Y OF ANAHEI@II THAT
~'~~,- 62-~3-26
~,,^^ ~ PETITION FOR RECLASSIFiCATION N0. BE APPROVED
WHEREAS, the Clty Plenaing Commieaion of the City of Aneheim did raceive a vedfied Pet~tion foe12 e 1 si~c -
tion from LEO K. RANDALL and KINNETH C, RANL~ALL,. 12042 Morgan Lane~ C~arden Grove, Ca~I~~orn~`a,
Owners of certain real property s.ituated ia the..Cit~.Af Anaheim, County of Orange, State
of California, described as followsi The East 200 feet (measured to the centerline of
Mlagnolia Avenue) of the North 190 fe~t of the Snuth 312 feet of the.North 502 feet (measured
to the centerline of Broadway Avet~ue) of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter
of the Northeast quarter of Section 13, Township 4 South, Renge 11 West, in the Rancho Los
Coyotes, City of Anaheim~ County of Orange, State of California, as said section is shown on
a map thereof recorded in Book 51, Page 11, Miacellaneous Maps, Records of aaid Orange County,
California
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commieeion did hold a publlc headag at the C:{y Hall ia the Clty of Aaeheim on
September 17~ 1962 at 2:00 o'clock P.M~ .notice of seid public hearktg hevina been dµly Qlven ns requited..by
lew end in eccordence with tha provieione of the R~nqheim Muaicipel Code, Chaptee 18.72, tn heai aad considee eyideslce
for and agelnet aeid ptopoeed reclaeeificetlon end to lnvestlg~te and make 8adiags c~td ae~ommendatione ia coanoction
thecewith; end
WHEREAS, aeid Commieeion, a$er due inepection, ieveetigetion, ead etudy made by it~elf aad !s~ its bohalf, ~nd
a£ter due conaideration of ell evidence and reports offe:ed et said henzing, doea find and dateemina tha following.heta: '
1. That the petitionee pmposes n eeela~sification of the above deecrlbed pmperty feom the R-A, Residenti~~,.
Agricultural, Zone to the C-1, Neighborhood Commercial, Zone to establiah neighborhood
cormnercial fecilitiesa
2, Thet ehe proposed aeclesaificaUon of eubject propeety ie aeceeeary end/or deaieeble for the orderly aad pro-
per development of tha communfFy.
3. Thet the pcoposed roclaaai8cutlon of eubJect proparty doee properly celate to the zoaes and thetr petmitted
uses locally establiahed in cloae praximity to eubject pmperty ead to the aones end their petmitted ptee generelly eatab-
Ilehed throughout the community.
4o That the proposed reclessification of sub~ect property does not reuqire dedication
for and atandard improvement of ebutting staeets because said property does relate to and
abut upon streets and highways which ere improved to carry the type and quantity of traffic,
which will be generated by the permitted uses, in accordance with the circulation element
of the Genaral Plano
5. That the petitioner agreecl to work with the property owners ad~acE
of sub~ect property,to permit the construction oi the requir~d six (6) foot
6. That nv one appeared in opposition to sub~ect petition9
Rl-A
---vca ~ ~ . .
~~'~ - ,
-1-
~
~ ~~ ~„
wr ~ ~F~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Meheim City Planning~~mmission doea hereby recommend
to the City Council of the City of Aneheim thet subject Petition for Reclassification be appmved and, by so doing,
thet Title 1&Zoning of the Aneheim Municipel Code 6e amended to exclude the above described propetty from the
R-p, Residential Agricultural, Zone and to incorporate said described.property in the C-1,
Neighborhood Commercial, Zone, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a
necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the sub~ect property in order to preserve the
safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
1. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Magnolia Street.
2. Provision of standard trash starage areas as determined by the Department of Public Works,
Sanitation Division, prior to Final Building Inspection.
3a . Pr.o.vis3on .of .a _thrae (3) f.oot..gublic ~til.ity easement. and a two (2) foot overhang ease-
ment along the westerly boundary of.the..sub~ect.property to.adequately serve the sub~ect
property and other propertiss., at tha.time of_ the ins.taLLa~ian o£ the ser.vice f.aciLities.
4e Time limitation of one hundred.and eighty (180) days for the accomplishment of Item Noo 1.
5: Development substantialLy in accordance. with.Exhihit Noso 1., 2,. 3, and 4e
6. Construction,of..a s3x (6) foot masonry.wall_along the west boundary of sub~ect property,
and the construction of a forty-two (42) inch masonry wall along the north boundasy of
suh~ect property prior to Final Building Inspection.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is eigned and apprcved by me this 17th day of Septembar, 1962.
ATTEST:
SECf2ETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNIIdG COMMISSION
• STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY CF ORpNGE ) es~
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
CHAIRMAN ANAHE3M CITY PLANNINd COMMISSIO ,
I~ Ann Krebs ~ Secretery of thn City Planning Commiseioa of the City of Aneheim, do horeby cedify that the ftlce-
going cesolution wes pessed end adopted et a meeting of the City Plenning Commiseion of th~ City of Anaheiin, held oa
September 17~ 1962~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the membeia thereof;
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:Allred, Camp, Chavos, Gauer, Marcoux, Mungall, Pebley, Perry.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
AHSEIVT: COMMISSIONERS: Hapgoo~i.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto aet my hand this 17th day of September~ 1962.
RESOLUTION N0.497
R2-A
_ C~~2~~Zve~t/
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITX PLANNING COMMISSION
-2-
' ,,.._~.~-_~~._------------.____.__..__..._-__-_:-____ ^.--
'~ • -
~