PC 1962-1963-508I
~
'~~~ ;~. _
RESOLUTION N0. 508, SERIES 1962-63
1' ,. ~ ^
~
~ {:
~^1
~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF AI3AHEIM
RECOiYIMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAI~]EIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-123 gE pppROVED
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim did receive a verified Petition for Reclessifica-
tionfrom JOHN D. CLAUSSEN, 9912 South Placentia Avenue, Anaheim, California, Owner; FRIDRICKS
DEVIIAPMINT ~RPORATION, 524 West Commonwealth Avenue, Fullerton, California, Agent,of certain
real property situated in the City of Anaheim County of Orange, State of California, described
as The Southwest quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 13, being a portion of Lot 41 in
Township 4 South, Range 10 West, in the Rancho San Juan Cajon de Santa Ana, in the Cit•~ of
Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as per map recorded in book 2 pages 256 and
257 of Patents of Los Angeles County, Cal~fornia. EXCEPT therefrom the North 20 acres and
further described as 9912 South State College Boulevard, Anaheim, California
; and
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hatl i~~ tlie City of Anaheim on
Or,tober 1~ 1962 at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of seid public hearing having been duly given as required•by
law and in eccordance with the provisions of the Maheim Mun?cipel Code, Cheptet 18.72, to heet end conaidet evIdence
for and egainst seid proposed reclassification and to investigate and meke findings end recommendetions in connecUon
therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation, end study made by itself and In ite behelf, end
after due consideration of all evidence end reports offered et seid heering, doea find end determine the following facts:
1. That the pekitioner proposes a reclassification of the above described pmperty Erom the R-A~ Residential
Agricultural, Zone to the R-3, Multiple Family Residential, Zone, and the C-1, Neighborhood
Commer~ial, 2one to establish a single story multiple family residential subdivision develop-
ment and neighborhood commercial facilties.
2. That the proposed :eclassification of subject property is necessary and/or desireble for the orderly and pra
per develapment of the community.
3. Thet the proposed reclessification of subject property does properly relate to the zones and their permitted
uses locally esteblished in close proximity to subject property end to the zones end their permitted uses generally esteb-
lished throughout the community. •
4. That •the proposed reclassif ication of subject property does require dedication for
and standard improvement of abui;ting streets because said property does relate to an abut
upon streeis and highways which are proposed to carry the type and quan~ity of traffic,
which wi~l be generated by the permitted uses, in accordance with the circulation element
of the General Plano~
5. That adopted Planning Study No. 45-114-4 projected subject property for C-1,
Neiyhborhood Commer;ial, Zone and R-3, Multiple Family Residential, Zone substantially as
requested by the petitioner.
6o That 20 persons appeared in opposition to subject petition.
Rl-A _1_
- -- - - -,~ -
F~--
:: ~~-=~~~ ` : ' ~.
:_
__~ . _ _. .. .
. , .
;.
~
t _~.
i~
;-=t.
~-~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission hereby
recommends to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that Petition for Reclassification
Non 61-62-123 be approved and, by so doing, that Title 18 - Zoning of the Anaheim Muni-
cipal Code be amended to exclude the above described property from the R-A, Residential
Agricultural, Zone and to incorporate said described property in the R-3, Multiple Fami-
ly Reaidential, Zone and the C-1, Neighhorhood Commercial, Zone, upon the foliowing
conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of
the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens
of Anaheims
1. Recordation of a Final Tract Map of subject property.
2„ Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be
collected as part of the Building Permit.
3. Provision of standard trash storage areas as detPrmined by the Department
of Publ~c Works, Sanitation Division, prior to Final Building Inspection,
for both the commercial development and the multiple family residential
developmento
4. Recordation of R•-3, Multiple Family Residential, Zone deed restrictions
limiting structural height of proposed R-3 development to one story.
5~ Constructlon of a six foot masonry wall along north and east boundaries
of svbject property unless said walls are specifically waived in writing by
the abutting property owners prior to Final Building Inspection.
6~ Constraction of a six (6) foot masonry wall along the south side of "A"
Street abutting the proposed commercial development and along the west side
of the a11ey separating Lot Noa 33 from Lot No. 34 of Tentative Map of Tract
No,. 4757 and along the south side of the alley separating Lot Nos. 29 thru
33 from Lot No„ 34 and along the west side of the alley separating Lot Nos.
"24 thru 26 from Lot No. 340
7~ Installation of landscaping on that Fortion of the parkway between the curb
and sidewalk along the south side of "A" Street, the full distance of the
block wall separating Lot No. 34 from "A" Street, plans for said landscaping
to be submitted and subject to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway
Maintenance, and said landscaping to be installed prior to Final Building
Inspection of the units proposed for Lot Nos. 1 thru 7.
Bo Provision of a minimum 6 foot wide strip of landscaping along the State
College Boulevard and Ball Road rights-of-way abutting subject property,
plans for said landscaping to bf! submitted to and subject to the approval
of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance, and said landscaping to be
installed prior to Final Bi~ildi.ng Inspection of any structure on Lot No. 34.
9a Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit No. 1.
~
10. Subject to Architectural Commlttee Review of all commercial building plans
provided that the north and east elevations of the proposed commercial buildings
shall be compaiible to the projected multiple f~mily residential development.
11. Recordation of deed restrictions prohibiting the use of the G 1 property for
multiple family residential development.
12,. Provision that the C-1,Neighborhood Commercial, Zone be developed in conjunction
with or prior to the R-3, inultiple f amily development.
k2-A
RESOLUTION N0. 5Q8
-2-
~ ---_ . - _ ~.. . . . _ _. - .--
1
THB PORHGOING RHSOLUTION is signed and approved by me this lst day of October, 1962.
CHAIRD ANAHHIM CiTY PIANNING COAAlI
ATTBST:
~~~~'2 vf v ~~~~ (~iG~aJ
~BCRBTARY ANIlHBIM CITY Y NNING CQD4dI3SI0N
STATH OP CALIPORNIA )
COtlNTY OP OItANGH ) sa.
CITY OP ANA.HBIM )
I~ ANN KItEBS ~ SecreYary of the Cif.y Planning Commission of the City of
Anaheim, da hereby certify that the foregoing reaolution was passed and adopted at a
meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on October 1, 1962
at 2;00 o~clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof;
A7~S: CCY~AtISSIONHP,S: Allred, Chavos, Gauer, Marcoux, Mungall, Pebley.
NOB3: C(~F4IISSIONBRg; Plone.
ABSENT: CCIMMI3SI02~t3; Camp, Hapgood, Perry.
IN WITNSS3 WHBRHOP, I have hereunto set my hand this lst day of October, 1962.
/ /~~~~./!~!%~
SBCRSTARY ANAHBIM CITY PLINNING COAA1Z83ION
R3-A
RESOLUTION N0, 508 -3-
- -~ .. ~
\
- ;~::
::°:;;>';..~,
~~ , ~ - - . .._. _ .
~