PC 1962-1963-512~ ,
. ~ . `. ,
.' 0~-~ ~ ~ .:~ b ' :~ ~~ I ~ ::
~
;j
;j
?~
1'
I
_: ~
,, ,;
i
*I
,
:i
i
~
I
~l~
,
~ ~
~
,~
'i
s
i
;'~
;i
'i
i
f
I
~
i
`;i
~
`1
t
i
i
1
,
,
1~
R~SOLUTiuN NO. 512, SERIES 1962-63 `~~ _
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMI5SION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEpA
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-33 gE APPROVED
WHEREr1S, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did ceceive a verified~etit~on foF Rer~aseifica-
tionfrom BUENA VISTA OONVALESCENT hOSPITAL, 1682 Buena Vista, Anahe:~m, ali ornia, vwners;
INA WALKER, 1670 West Buena Vista, Anaheim,_California, Agent of certain real property
siutated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, and described as
Lot Nos. 26 and 27 of Tract No. 3303, as shown on.a Map recorded in Book 110, pages
33 and 34 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of Orange County, California.
; end
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold a public headng at the City Hell in the City of Anaheim on
OCtobeT 15~ 1962~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of seid public hearing heving been duly given ea required •by
law end in eccordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.72, to heai end consider evidence
foc and ageinst seid pioposed ceclassification end to investigete end meke findings end recommmdeUons in connection
thecewith; end .
WHEREAS, said Commission, efter due inspection, investigetion, end study mede by itself end in its behalf, end
after due consideration of ell evidence and reports offered et seid headng, does find and determine the following fects:
1. That the petitianer proposes a reclassificetion of the above described property from the R-1~ One Family
Residential, Zone to the C-1, Neighborhood Commercial, Zone limited to business and pro-
fessional uses only to allow an existing rest home and permit its expansion.
2. That the proposed reclassification of subj~~;.property is necessery and/or desireble tor the o:derly and pro-
per development of the community.
3. Thet the proposed reclassificetion oF subject pcoperty does properly celete to the zones and their permitted
ases locally esteblished in close proximity to subject prope:ty and to the zo:;es end their permitted uses generally esteb-
lished throughout the communlty.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does not require de~ication
for and standard improvement of abutting streets because said property does relate to and
abut upon streets and highways which are improved to carry the type and quantity of traffic,
which will be generated by the permitted uses, in accordance with the circulation element
of the General Plan.
5. That no one appeared in opposition to subject petition.
Rl-A -1-
~ ,
_ . , ,:
,If ~ ~ _ ... . ,
._.---•---- --~ -. •'
- _. `~_
~
~ ~
~ ~,:b~fae~~..
. .. .~:,
r
1 '
'~-~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT Ei.. ~OLVED thet the Anaheim City Plenning ,,.immission does hereby recommead
to the City Council of the City of Anaheim thet subJect Petition for Reclassi~icatlon be epproved end, by so doing,
thet Title 18-Zoning of the Aneheim Municipal Code be emende3 to exclade the ebove described propeety from the
R-1, One Family Residential, Zone, and to incorporate said described property in the G1,
tdeighborhood Commercial, Zone upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a
necessary prerequisite tn the proposed use of the subject property in order to preser:•a the
safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
1. Provision of a five (5) foot public utility easement along the soutnerly boundary
of the subject property to adequately serve the subject property and other properties, at
the time of the installation of the service facilities.
2. Provision of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Department of
Public Works, Sanitation Division, prior to Final.Building Inspection.
3. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibits A and B.
4. Subject to the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 303.
5. Provision of fully inproved parking in accordance with Code requirements prior to
Final Building Inspection of the proposed expansion.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and appmved by me this ]~5th day of October~ 1962.
ATTEST:
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANN,'PiG COMMISSION
~.~2~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY CF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs ~ Secretery of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby ~
going resolution was passed and edopted at a meeting of the City Plr~nning Commiseion of the Ciry ~
Oc•tober 15~ 1962~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the Eollowing vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Gauer, Marcoux, Mungall, Peble
NOES: COMMI3SIONERS: Chavos.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Hapgood.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hend this ~5th day of October~ 1962.
RESOLUTfiON NO. 512
R2-A
~
~~~~~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLAN1VINf
_Z.