PC 1962-1963-513~
I - • .
,~ 1~. i:.~~~: .
~ ~ n 513, SERIES 1962-63 '` 1
,i RESOLUTION ~NO. ~~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
~ RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 05 ANAHEIM THAT
~ PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0.62-63-34 gE DENIED
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City oE Aneheim did receive a verified Petition for Recla'ssifica-
tionfrom JAMES L. and CONSTANCE SLOAN, 1015 North Acacia Avenue, Anaheim, California, and
HENRY R. and CARMEN E. HOGG, 1603 Briarvale Avenue, Anaheim, California, Owners of certain
real pr.operty situated in the City or Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, de-
~ scribed as The West 66.5 feet of the East 393 feet of the North half of the Northeast
quarter of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 7, Township 4 South,
Range 10 West, in the Rancho San Juan Cajon de S?nta Ana, City of Anaheim, County of Orange,
State of California, as per map recorded in book 51, page 10 of Miscellaneous Maps, in
the off ice of the county recorder of said county
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hell in the City of Aneheim on
Uctober 15~ 1962~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public hearing having been duly given as required
by law and in accordence with the provisions af the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.72;to hear and consider evi-
dence for aed egainst seid 'proposesi reclessification and to investigete end meka findinp,s and recomme~.detions in
connECtion therecvith: and
WFiEREAS, said Commission, aEter due inspection, investigation, end study mede b; itself and in its behnlf,
and after due consideration of ail evidence and reports offered at seid hearing, does find 9nd determine the following
facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes a reclassification of the above described properiy fcom !he R-A~ Residential
Agricultural, Zone to the R-3, Nultiple Family Residentiei, Zone to es:.ablish a single story
multiple family residential development.
2. That the proposed reclassi£ica~ion of subject property is not necessary and~or
desirable for the orderly and proper development oi the community.
3. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does not properly relate to
the zones and their permitted uses locally established in close proximity to subject property
and to the zones and their permitted uses gene•rally established throughout i:he community.
4, That the pians, as submitted, would constitute a substandard multiple family
development of subject property.
5. That the width of subject property does not meet the minimum R-3 lot width requii~e-
ments.
6. That the driveway as proposed on the plot plans did not con~ply with the minimum
required for an R-3 development.
7. That in a recent action bythe City Council, the second and third parcels of property
to t:~e west of subject property was denied for multiple family development as constituting a
residential encroachment of inedium density development into an area projected by the Council
for low-density residential development.
8. That one letter signed by seventeen (17) persons was received in opposition, and
a letter signed by eight (8) persons was received in favor of subject pe~tition.
Ri-D -1- ~ .
i
;
s ; ~ } -~ , ~t ;
~ ~ ;
;Y ~ ~ ~ ` S~ ~ i . ~i ,
~
;\ , ~~ +; r
c
,.
.~
I
'~~
~._,.`
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Aneheim City Planning Commission does hereby recommend
to the City Council oE the Ciry of Anaheim that subject Petition for Reclassificetion be denied on the besis of the
efo:ementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end approved by me this 15th day of October~ 1962.
~~ j~,G~l~-l~/'vJ..P ~ ~==~S~GU(-L'/f
CHAIRM.:A ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ~
ATTGST:
[;~~ f~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMfSSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COIINTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~.,-pntL'~3fi~e13g~ Secretary of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify thet the fore-
going resolution was passed end edopted at a meeting oE the City Planning Commission ofthe City of Aneheim, held on
October 15~ 1962, et 2:00 o'ciock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Chavos, Gauer, Marcoux, Mungall, Pebley, Perry.
NOES: CCniMISSIONERS: None.
HBScNT: COMMISSIONERS: Hapgood.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 15th day of October~ 1962.
( ~f/Yl/yl /
SE(:RETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0. 513
R2-D
-2-
~ -- _.__._ _.._.. _~_,_
__.....- .- _.__.. ____-- s:rra 1~