PC 1962-1963-515} ~ ~
RESOY,UTION NO.-515, SERIES 1962-63
A RE~OLUTION OF THE CTTY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CYTY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0. 1526 gE DEAtIED
, WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commiseion of the City of Meheim did receive a verified Petition for Vedance from
' IAUIS J. and DOROTHEA E. STACKER, 2431 Mall Avenue, Anaheim, California, Owners of certain
real property situated in the City of An~heim, County of Orange, State of California, described
,~ as Lot No. 100 in Tract No. 1940, and furthex descr3bed as 2431 Mall Avenue, Anaheim, Cal-
if ornia
; end
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold e public headng at the City Hell in the City of Aneheim on
October 29~ 1962~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of s~id pub$c heating havinB beat duly glven es cequired by
law end in eco~xdaace wlth the pmvisioos of the Maheim Municipel Code, Cheptet 18.68, to hear and coasider evidence for
and ageinst seid proposed veriance and to inveatigate and meke finding's ead recommendetions in connection therewith;
end
WHEREAS, seid Commission, aRer due inepection, 3nvesHgetlon, and otudy mnde by itself and in its behelf,
end efter due coneideration of ali evideace end topods offered ae said headng, does find and determine the following
facts:
1. That the prtitioner requests e vezience from the Aneheim Manicipal Code: Section 18.20.030 (3) which
requires that any addition to exi.s~ting dwellings should not extend closer than ten (10) feet
to the rear lot line.
2. That there are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable ;
to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally
to the ~s•~perty or class of use in the same vicinity and zone. '
3. That the requested variance is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of
a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone, and
denied to the property in question. ,
h. That no one appeared in opposition to subject petition.
-i-
~
~ a ,.
fl
j , 4
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RCSOLVED thut the Meheim Cihy Planning Comwiesian does hoteby deny subject
Petitlon for Vadence on the besis of the afotementioaed findfags.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is sigaed and approved by me this 29th day of October, 1962.
~ ~i~,is?,~ .c • _
~ -
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMIS
~ ATTE~T:
SECRETARY ANAHE TY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) as. '
CITY OF ANAHETM )
I, Ann Krebs, Sectetary of the C4ty Planning Commission of the City of Maheim, do hereby aedify thet the fore-
going resolution wae pessed end adopted et a meeting of the City Pl~pB Commiasion of the City of Aneheim, held on
October 29, 1962~ at 7.:00 o'clock p.r1., by the following vote of the members theceof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Chavos, Gauer, Dllarcoux, Mungall, Pebley.
NOES: COINMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Hapgood, Perry.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I.heve hereunto set my hend th.!s 29th day of October~ 1962.
l/ V~/fij~~/
SECRETARY ANni~EDN rITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0.515
V2-D ~2"
_~-- --~ ___.._. ... _ _ _ _ . ._ . _ _ _. _ . _ _ _ . -
, _ _. . _ .
-~i . ~ (~---