PC 1962-1963-543a~ 543,' SERIES 1962-63 1~~
f ~ RESOLU i ~N NO.
fi; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
~ti
~'. RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
~• r: PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 62-63-41 gE ~ppROVED
i ~~':
wFiEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anaheim did initiate a verif ied Petitic~n i or
Reclassification on property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of
California, described as..Lot Nos. l through 10, the west.one-half of I.ot No. 15, and
Lot Nos 16 through 31 of Tract. No. 483, and further described as 1701-1739 and 1761-1839
West La Palma Avenue . •
; end
WHEREAS, the City Pia~ning Commission did hold a public headng at the City Hell in the.City of MeheLn on
November 26~ 1962~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M. noEice of said public heedng heving been duly given es requlted •by
lew end in accordence with the pmvisions of the Meheim Municipal Code, Cheptet 18.72, to hear end conelder evidence
for end ageinst said ptoposed reclasaification and to investigate end maka findings end recommendations ia coanoctioa
therewith; and
WHEREAS, eaid Commisaion, after due inepection, investigeUon, end atudy made by itself end ia ita behalf, end
efter due consideration of ell evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determirte the following .facte:
1. Thetthe City Council proposes a reclassification of the above described properties
from the R-A, Residential Agricultural, Zone for Parcel Nos. 4 through 8, the west one-half
of Lot No. 15, and Lot Nos. 16 through 31, the C-2, General Commercial, Zone of Parcel
Nos. 1, 2, and 3~`C-3, Heavy.Commercial Zone of Parcel Nos. 9~nd 10 to the C-1,
Neighborhood Cormriercial, Zoc~e subject to the cnnditions contained herein, as an intent to
provide for the proper reclassification of the respective parcels of Tract No. 483.
2. That the proposed reclassificetion of aubJect property is neceasary end/or deaireble for the ordarly end pro-
per development of the community.
3. That the proposed reclassiflcetion of aubJect property does pmperly relete •to the zones end thelt pe~mittod
uses locally estebliahed in close proxlmity to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally eatab-
lished throughout the community.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject propc.rty does require dedication for
and standard improvement of ebutting streets because said property does relate to and abut
upon streets and highways which are proposed to carry the type and quantity of txaffic, which
will be generated by the permitted uses, in accordance with the circulation elemen~ of the
General Plan.
5. That one pe~son appeared in opposition to a condition of fifty-three (53) feet
dedicatibn for La P~lma Avenue widening.
Rl-A -1-
i
~
~
~
,,
:4
i~
`Sa
AI
;4
J}
~.
x ' ~
~' ~~ . NOW, THEREbURE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby
~ recommend to the City Council of the City of Anaheim that subject Petition for Reclassification
f;,. be approved and, by so doin9i that Title 18-Zoning of the Anaheim Municipal Code be amended
~s to exclude the.above described property from the R-A, Residential Agricultural, for Parcel
~• i~= Nos. 4 through 8, the west one-half of Lot No. 15, anc',.I.ot Nos. 16 through 31, G2, General
~~:; Commercial, Zone of Parcel Nos. 1, 2, and 3, and C-3, Heavy.Commexcial, Zone of parcel
Nos. 9 and 10 and to incorporate said des~ribed property in the C-1~ Neighborhood Co~mnercial,
~`- Zone upon the following conditions which are hereb found to be a necessar rere
i~. to the proposed use of the sub'ect y p y A 9quisite
~,,~ ~ property in order to reserve the safet and eneral
~, welfare of .the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
~~. 1. Dedication of fifty-three (53) feet from the.monumented centerline of La Palma
Avenue, within one.hundred and eighty (180) days for Parcel Nos. 3, 4, 5~ 6, 7, 8, west
'~ one-half of 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25. 26 27 28 29 30, and 31.
s~' r > > e > > e > > r s ~ s ~
++`~~ 2. Dedication of fifty-three (53) feet frnm the monumented centerline of Euclid Avenue,
~ within one hundred and eighty (180) days for.Parcel Nos. 1, 2, and 3.
~~` ; 3. Preparation of street imprpvement plans and the installation of all improvements
~: ~ for La Palma Avenue, subject to the approval.of the City Engineer and in accordance with the
'~ ; adopted standard plans on f.ile in the off.ice of the City Engineer, said improvements to be
r;;~ ~ accomplished within one hundred and ei ht
g y(180) days for Parcel Nos. 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 21,
~~ 24, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, and 31.
~: 4. Paymen~ of.$2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on La Palma Avenue, to be paid
~, within one,~i{~lred eighty~(180) days for Parcel Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, west one-half,of 15, 16,
17, 18, 1~,.•~20;.~:'2l, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, and 31. ''
~ 5. Payment of $2.00 per...f~ont foot•for street lighting purposes on Euclid Avenue, to be'paid
= within one hundred and eighty (180) days for Parcel Nos. ly'2, and 3.
; i 6. Provision of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public Works,
` i Sanitation'Division prior to Final Building Inspection for Parcel Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9~
j 1""''10~•we'St one-half of 15,~ 16~ 17~ 18~ 19~ 20~ 21~ 22~ 23~ 24~ 25~ 26~'27~ 28,`~29, 30,"and 31'.
r, ~ `' 7. Development in accordance with plans approved by the City Council, incorporating
~~ ` the removal of all residential structures, if any, and replacement with Commercial Buildings,
•~~ in accordance with all applicable provisions contained herein and all applicable provisions
contained in Title Eighteen of the Anaheim Municipal Code for Parcel Nos. 6, 7, 8, g, 10,
?I 18, 19, 20, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, and 31.
~ 8. Provision of a sixty (60) feet setback from the planned highway right-of-way line
~~ of La Palma Avenue for Parcel Nos. 6, 7, 8,.9, 10, 18, 14, 20, and 21.
c 9• Provision of a fifteen (15) foot landscaped setback from the planned highway right-
~ of-way line of La Palma Avenue for Parcel Nos. 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, and 31.
; 10. Provision of treewells in the parkway portion of La Palma Avenue, spaced at approx-
~ imately forty (40) foot intervals, plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and subject
to the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance, and said landscaping to be
i! installed prior to reclassificatio.n or Final Building Inspection for Parcel Nos. 6, 7, 8, 9,
~ 10, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 26, 29, 30, and 31.
THE FORBGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 26th day o November, 1962.
ATTEST: `~
CHAIRh N ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING QO ON
SECRETARY ANAHEIM C Y PLANNING QOMMISSION
STATE OF CALIIU RNIA )
OOUM'Y OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the City
Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, held on November 26, 19b2 at 2:00 o`clock P.M.,
by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYESt COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Chavos, Gauer, Marcoux, Mungall, Pebley, Perry.
NDESt 00MMMISSIONERS: Camp.
ABSENTs OOMMISSIONERSs Hapgood.
IN WITNESS WHER~F, I have hereunto set my hand t is 26th day of, November, 1962.
~•
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING OOMMISSTON
RESOLUTION N0. 543
R2-A -2-
.._.. ......,..:.:...,_.~x{ •