PC 1962-1963-568;~
. . _... _.._ . _ __._
---------------_ ------ ~ - -_ __ --___--______ _ - - --
~; .
~, .
~ ~~ ~} :~~
' RESOLUTION N 0. 568, SERIES 1962-63
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHE]M
RE~OMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH~ CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 62~ 3 3~ BE APPROVED
x
,
i
~'
i
~
i
;y
3
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did ceceive a verified Petitioa for Realassifica-
tionfrom ROBERT.G. ROBBy D.D.S.9 1707 South Euclid Avenue, Anaheim, California, Owner of
certain,r.eal.property situated in the City.of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
described as Lot No. 17 in Tract No. 2176, and further described as 1703 Sumac Lane, Anaheim,
California ~
; and
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Meheim on
DeCember 27~ 1962~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of said public hearing heving been duly given es required •by
law and in accordance with the pcovisions of the Anaheim Municipel Code, Chapter 18.72, to hear and consider evideace
for end ageinst said ptoposed ceclassification end to investigete and make findings and eecommendatione in conaection
thecewith; and '
WHEREAS, ~eid Commission, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself end in its behelf, end
efter due consideretion of all evidence end cepocts offeced at seid hea:ing, does find end detennine the followiag facts:
Y. That the petitionec proposes a:eclassification of the ebove described pmperty fmm the R-1~ One Family
Residential, Zone to the C-1, Neighborhood Commercial, Zone to establish a dental office
in an existing residence. .
2. That the proposed reclassificetion of subject pcoperty is necessery endJor desirable for the orderly end pro-
per development of the community.
3. That the proposed reclassificeiion oE subject pcopedy does properly relete •to the zones and their permitted
uses lacally esteblished in close proximity to subject property end to the zones and their permitted uses generally eateb-
lished throughout the community.
4. That the proposed reqlassification of subject propexty does require standard
improvement of abutting streets because said property does rela~e to and abut upon strEets
and highways which are partially improved to carry the type and quantity of traffic, which
will be generated by the permitted uses, in accordance with the circulation eleme~rt of the
General Plan.
5, That the limitation of available parking on subject property would limit profess-
ional use of existing residence to one professional office only.
6. That orre letter was received in opposition to subject petition.
Rl-A "1'
11__,_ '_' ~~F.~:.i_ .____ . "~"
'.. .. _ "~ . , ~ ~
`' ~-~ ~~
;~~~~ t_>
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does he~eby recommPnd
to the City Council of the. City of Aneheim that subject Petition for ReclassificaClon be appmved and, by so doing,
thet Title 1&Zoning of the Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to exclude the above described pmperty from the
R-1, One Family Residential, Zone and to incorporate said described property into the C-1,
Neighborhood Commercial, Zone, upon the following conditions ~ninich are herebp-found to be a
necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of ihe subject property in order to preserve the
safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
1. ..Installation of sidewalks and.driveways on Euclid S.treat and Sumac Lane. in accordance with
the adopted standaxd_plans .on file .in the .of.fice. of .the City Engineer.
2. Provision of standard trash storage areas as determied by the Department of Public Works,
Sanitati.on Di~risi.on, .pxiox_to_.F3na1 Building Inspectinn.
3. Payment of $2.00 per front foot f.or street.lighting purposes on Euclid Street.
4.. Exis.ting..driveway depressions shall be removed and replaced with standard cUrb and gutter,
in accordance.with standard.adapted plans in.the.office of the City Fngineer.
5. Time limitation of one hundred and e.ighty (180) days for the. accompl.ishment of Item Nos.
1, 3,. and 4.
6. Dev.elopment substantially in accor.dance.with Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, and 30
7.. .Installation of a three.and one-half (3-~) foot.masonry wall along the west property
line,..extending from_the.existing wall southerly to the front }~roperty lineo •
8. Recordation of C-1 deed restrictions limiting the use of sub3ect property to one profess-
ional office only. . ,
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 27th day of December, 1962.
_ ~J ~;
CHAII2NAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSIO
ATTEST:
~/ v ~ '//' ~ ~~~~~`t°~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE 0~' CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY :F ORANGE ) ss~
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs ~ Seccetary of the City Planning Commissiort of the City of Aneheim, do 2:ereby certify thet the fore-
going resolution wes passed end adopted et a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City af Anaheim, held un
DeceIDber 27, 1962, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMiSSIONERS: Chavos, Gauer, Marcoux, Mungall, Pebley, Perry~
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None<
ABSEiYT: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Hapgoodo
IN WITNESS iVHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hend this 27th day of December~ 1962.
~~~~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 568
R2-A
,-~ ~
_~.
x j
,;
~ .~
~
:~
-__~._._-------.__._~~.____._~__ _~..
---- - - . _---- - ~ ----~______.-____,.._..,...-_ ~
~ ` n
_ ~