PC 1962-1963-573I
~ ~. ~ . .. ~ ~ -~
~'E _
.
. .
~ ~ ~. . . ~ ~ . ~
. . --
_. _ . . _ . .. . . . ~ . .
~
~
' ~ ~ . . _ ~
. ~ • , . .
. .....
`
.: ~ .~ ~ . .. ~ . . . ~ .
. ~
~
. ~' . . . . . . ..
~. . . ~_'_~~
~
~
I
~
~ • ,.. . - .. .. . ~ . ~ ' ~ . . ~ ~ ~ ~ . . ~ _ . . . . . . . --,---- - -_.
~ . . . ~ ~~ ' . `~.~ ~ . . ~ ~ -
RESOLUTION NO. 573,'SERIES 1962-63
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM .
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PEFtMIT 304 gg Ggp~TED
f
; -
WHEREAS, the Ctty Plenn:ng Commissioa of the City_of Maheim did recei~~e a vetified Petition for Conditionel
Use Permitfmm WILLIAM BR~DER, 2135 West Ball Road, Anaheim, California, Owner;'LIItpy RpS£, •
1695 Crescent Street, Anaheim, California, Agent of certain real property
situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orenge, State of California described as Lot
No. 6 of Tract No. 162, as per map recorded in Book 12s Page 6, of Miscellaneous Maps, in
the office of the County Recorder of said county. EXCEPT the North 160 feet thereof
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commiseion did hold a pubHc hearing at the City Hell in the City of Aneheim on
December 27, 1962, at 2:00 o'clock P.6t.; notica of seid public hearing.haviag been duly given ea tequired by
law e.nd in accordence with the provieions of the Meheim Munleipal code, Chapter 18.64, to hear end consider evidence
for enn egeinat eaid proposed conditionel uae end to iavestigate: end meke findiaga end recommendetions in connection
therewith; end
WHEREAS, seid Commission, e@er due inspeMion, inveatigation, and study made by itself end In ita behelf, and
efter due consideration uf all evfdrnce and reports offered at seid headng, doea find end.detecmiae the following facts:
1. That the pmposed use is properly one'for which e Coaditioaal ,Uae Peemit is authodzed by this Code, to
wit: establish a two-story planned-unit multiple family development with carports.
2. That ffie proposed use.will not edversely effect the adjoining land uses and the growth snd development of
the erea in which it is propoaed to be located.
3. Tnet the size end shepe of the aite proposed for We use is adequate to allow the full development of the
pro~osed use in e manner not detdmentel to the perticular area nor to the peace, health, safety, end general welfam
of the Citiznnts of the City of Aneheim,
4., That the grenting of the Conditlonal Use Pecmit under the conditione imposed, if any, w;ll not be detrimentel
to the peace, health, sefety, end genetal welfere of the Citizens o~ the City of Anaheim.
5. That the traffic generated by the proposed use will qot impose an undue burdeq
upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area. ,
6. That no one appeared in opposition to subject petition.
:
~ ,~
i.i
~ ~ ~'~
. ' ~
- . --_,: -'~
~~
~~- : _
1. Payment of a.Park and Recrqation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be collected as 'I
par.t of the._Building.Permit. ~
2.`Prn~isian.of standard tsash stor.age.areas as-determined.by the Department of Public j
Works.,_S~nitation:Div3sion, ~r3or to:Final.Building.Ins~aectinn. ~
3. .:Access:..dr3v.es_shall..be,.a_.minimum of twent}~-one (21). feet in width with adequate i
angle cut-offs . prov3ded, or .a.minimiun of twenty-eight (2Et} feet .in width if no cut-offs
are,psovided:..and, .in,.all.casas,.shall_have_.a.min;m>>m yertical clearance of fourteen (14) feet. ~
4., Ins_tallation of_.fire l~~drants, as determined to he necessary by the City of Anaheim Fire j
Department, to.pr.ovide.adequate..fire protection. E
5. Payment._of $2.00 per fiont foot_f.or.street lighting purposes on Empire Street.
6.. Time limitation of one.hundred and:eighty.(180).days f.ar the accomplishmen~ of Item No. 5. 1
7. .Developmqnt substantially-in accordance with Exhibit.Nos. 1 and 2 as a~nended.
8. Revision 'of the pr.o~os.ed fLoor. }~lans sn as to.. pravide. acq~ss from the first floor to the
secdnd #.loor of .the .studio apartments.
9. Instailation of carports..in.lieu of garages under the authority granted by the Code; Sec-
tion 18.64.070, provided that the rear and.side w.alls of said carports shall be stuccoed and
enclosed storage cabinets shall be prov.ided at the rear wall of each carport, and that ade-
quate bumper guards shall be provided to protect the interior wall of the proposed carports
' from damage.
10. Subject to Architectural Committee approval of side and rear elevations. '
11. Installation of a six (6) foot masonry wa11 along the south boundary of subject property
priar to Final Building Inspection.
~12. Sub~ect to the approval of Reclassification No. 62-63-48.
THE FOREGOING:RFSOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 27th day of December, 1962.
~ ~
• ,/~~~.: .C~~D`-,'/ c-~.{' ~ ~~~a/'~'
CNAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING OOMMISSI~
ATTEST: ~
' ' ' ~~ '1..~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Aneheim City Planning Cemmission does hereby resCind ~
Resolution No..`502, Series 1962-63; and does.hereby grant subject petition for Conditional
Use Permit .upon the .fQ11.oWing coaditions..uahich._axe..her.eby .found to be a necessary pre- ;
re.quisite to the..pxo~osed-..use ~f..the. subject..propert~.in._qrder to preserve the safety and ;.
general welfare of the Citi.zens.. of. the. City. of Anaheim. ~
~ . .
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
~ COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
~ CITY OF ANAHEIM )
b. ~.
~ ~ I~ Ann, Krebs~• - Secretary of the City pianning Commtssion of the City of Aneheim, do hereby certify thet the
E' ~, • fotegoing ~esolution was pessed and edopted at a~eeting of the City Flenning CommIasion of the City of Aneheim,
F h; held on December 27, 1962~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
~ ;
~~ ~ AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Chavos, Gauer, Marcoux, Mungall, Pebley, Perry.
~;~ •
~
yi NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None. ,
AHSENT: C~MMISSIONERS: Allred, ~amp, Rapgood. ,
~; IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I havehereunto set my hend this 27th day of DeCember~ 1962.
RESOLUTION NO. 573
C2-G .
f,
~ ~ _
~ 1
SECRETARY ANAHEIhi CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-2.
~