PC 1962-1963-603u f
~ c4. ~
i
~ ;,~ ..^
~ . ~R~' ~
Ov
~ 4'.
RESOLUTION NO. 603, SERIES 1962-63
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO TFYE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 62-63-59 gE DENIED
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim did receive a verified Pe~ition for Recle'ssifica-
tion from DAVE DOMRIES~. 706 South Knott Avenue,. Anaheim, California, Owner; NEIL REITMAN' 10582
West Katella, Anaheim, .Calif.arnia, Agent of certain real pr.operty situated in the City of
Anaheim, County of Orange~ State of California described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and
referred to herein as though set forth in full
; and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold e public headng at the City Hall in the City of Aneheim on
January 7, 1963~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing 6eving been duly g[ven as required
by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Meheim Muaicipal Code, Chepter 18.72, to hear aad consider evi-
dence for end egainst said pcoposed reclassification and to investigate end mfilse findings e:td recommendatioas in
connection therewith: and
WHEREAS, said Commission, a8er due inspection, investigation, and study mede by itself end in ita behalf,
and after due consideration of all evidence and teports offezed at said hearing, does find end determine the following
fects:
1. 'ihet the petitioner proQoses a reclassificetion of the ebove dear3bed property from ffie R-Ay Residential
Agricultural, Zone to the R-3, Multiple Family Residential, Zone to permit the establishment
of a two-story planned-unit multiple family residential development.
2. That the proposed reclassification of subject property is not necessary.and~or
desirable for the orderly and proper development of the community.
3. That subject petition would be in conflict ~rith the Preliminary General Plan
which projects subject property for low-density residential use permitting a maximum of.
seven (7) dwelling units per net residential acre, whereas subject development proposes
a density uf thirty-five (35) dwelling units per net residential acre, or a medium density
residential develonment.
4. That the circulation as shown on the plot plan was inadequate and would be detrimental
to the health,safety,and genesal welfare of the future tenants, since subject property is more
than 600 feet in depth which would make it impossible for proper ingress and egress for trash
trucks and fire equipment.
5. That three persons appeared in opposition to subject petition.
Rl-D
~'
~.
-1-
~._____..._._~-.----._. __~... _..__._..._...---.___..__.._ __..__.__..__..------
~ ~` - r . --___--_ ~_... . _; ~
i _
. ; ,~ ; ~:
~ _.
I ~
~.
}'` ~ `/~ (~ . . ~ ~
~: ~ ~!~ 1 ~ i `~ ~ _ ,-.; .
;,
~
-
~
: , ._,
~~_;~~ _ _
__ ~ , - -.
.
~r~
~
~----.___-----___ _ __._.._ --~- -----------__~- -. ~
, ~- . -
,._._.., .,.,,.~
~,.~ `. ...
..., ,; ,.. . , ... , . ...
,,:: ~
,
.. ~..,. . , . .. _.._
_ . , _ . _ . . ._ .. _. .._ _.. _.
r ` i ;~ ~
` ~ *,~
~ °~:
;
ni.~. h
Y:' . , j ..m . ,
1
1
; ~~'~~~ 't.f' .
{ `
I
~" .~
r'
;, ; fS;'`
I' !
~ ,
,
~
I ~ ~
~1
3
1.
J
~ I ,
t
I a3
t . ~
~
.~~~~~ ^ 1,.~ ~[{~(~~
,~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~~ `~~~
~
; {+
},r;
~'#1,~~
'
_:•.
~~
j
.ij7
' '
MAIN RTRF.!:T AT ,
F(PTii, Sl~N'PA A11A. CAI.IFORP7IA • KIMBGHLY 7•68~1;:
~
.
,
}
~ i:icitl,::~s-~..:.:~:=s-=:r~~ .
-. _f~ .
~;'.;~:VER ~ :.~f:irOW
' ~ai s. rs,LiNOt~
PRELIMINARY REPORT ~ pn;~~g~;, CAT,uufi~;ip
Issued for Sole Use: of ~ • '
C~ur t.~,.~'~'jUSy
. i
You~ ~o. ERCrc~w N~.;. 4)6~+_ 5
In connection wilh your ~~,~~lic~tien for a Policy of T~Ne Insw~inre on the title to Ihe lan~l h~reinat~e~ •.l:~scnb~tn;
this reporf is issued is a.~ ar.~:n•.~~~~odc~tiun, ,+nd :,~,acic v~ith~v.i1 Hel,iiity and •tiithnut obligation t~ ~syue '-- F~r~l~y.
5181emenl of charq~t. ~Nill !. rc:nrlc c~f ~•.hen PoI~tY ia ~:~SUeJ, ~~r ~iinety daYs frnm milry of applir,,i•1i~~, il Pol~t'i
is not fssued prior to ~hat t, _.. ,
Dated a~ of~oveniUer ly~. :19i~:i . zt U.00 A.M.
, • Uk~~WGf COIINiY TITLE COMPANY
. >
.• • ,
~Y:`~ •~: i' ~`: l/:~! %~~
• ~~a.r1 D. hi!i~•ra,v, ' Tnu• oFtiEts
'dESTEE: DAV~ E. •I)OMRIES t::id /INi~ IX)1+itiL98~ husbaud ~nd wifr, ars jr.~int i;en+:u~~te.
SUFS~TEC`P 9:0:
._. Gc:neral t~nd af•e~~ia~ ')'r.ixee Yux• tlne J:isc~i]. ,ye•~r 3::~t'.'-196j~ Amnt~nt $2ti2.~1, A. P. ~
,r~~. 79-~_~+i-b. ~Secr,nu Tnst;H.l.L~~ur~':.l)~~n~:.r:i:L :~d : pn~1:i1 'Paxee 1'ar i:tir fict~~;:l ye+~s•
~.9G2-1y63, Amouub ~;;`6~:.~~, n. P. lvo. 79-1~~:~-~;,
. 17ze U:;•:r und Cr,ri;.r~~1 c~f' cienr~-.r.,s .'.:lu. )i~1~.LL:r:l.L ;t:~•e~mc oi' wcii:e~r, .i~ ur~y~ liAtUT'C:L;.Y
~.r~;an, i'~,:~~ivi3 ~cr•~,e, i.,;i,;, r:r i:y e:~ic T•.in~~:., ,~~~d i.he: r9~;ht~ c~~ wuy i-,r tsnd ~c,~ .,,:,eti•uci~
{ rriC~t.~..;r. ~>i dr~:~i.t;:,~;a dit~hes ~!,ki7•o~if~l~ ^,1~? t,~ ni~t 1•.~, :{..rriget.~ r~i' dr~tiu tl:~> adjsai~c~:~t land~
-~~ reserver:i in ~:ecde _:r record. •
,•' Matters whicl; :n;sy +.:f'f'ec~: i.hr t.it •: ~ii;leae ~:.l.C*cic..~.ed by Bi:e~temei:t~ .>~' Idec 1,~ :.;: it•:r.n
D~vid E. Domries, Ani, Lou~, lea >ir~: I~e!7. lte'_i.mu:,.
UF5CRIPTTON: . ,
N.l thai, aFrtain li~~d s.i.t.u~.~l:ec: i~ i:h~. C,'L•.it~~ oS Cc~!.linrnia~ Cuunty ~>. Urr~~re~ d.e~;; :iben
~5 f'oLlowF:;
The Norih ]~alf of i:he tio.:Ch,~eei. ;iuoi ~:n• •~f 'i;he A'~~::'.ird~-at qua.i~i;er uf thc; :~~ui:hta,>, ~: qu;-:.,.,i•
~~f Sectiu:~ 14~ Township ~: S~uLii, P~:r,~r,c: :~.L W<:at, Sar~ iiaruordirao ~3as~~ nnd !reridica~, ~r,?rt
particul:~r'iy described an PoLl.;;w~:
Eeginniiic; ::L a pr,1:~C iu tl~e Weai,er:ly 1i~~t. of r.41.:1 SNCti~n i~t, Soutli 0° 15' 1i5" F.;:st
674.42 feai, fxom i:he WeEt quari•,::r curn~r n1' K;••id 5a:rl:ion; thence Norl:h i3y` 36~ 5G" S~st.
602.84 feet to a[~oint; thence S~~irL•h 0° 16' E:.tsi. 3~'T.18 fc~t to +1 pnlnt; i•henae South
89° 36' 40" Weet 6b2.$7 fee~ to e point in ~he Wester]y line of sr.iid section; tn~.;ce
NortL 0° 15' 45" West 3j7.21 feet to 1:he point uf beginnir~~. .
Fxcepting therefrom the Nori:herly rectangulr~r two aci•ee.
Also excepting the•refrom i:he Southerly rectangular l2 acres.
, ~
~~,
.~.E,;
i
~ ~ I~~IJ`II~V~ 1~0~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ aqv . •
~ ~ ' Furm 106P . ~ , " ~ . iye(~~ ~
~,,: ~
--- - - ~~NtH i , ~ . _:~~ . . .
' , ~ ':~!
' lOJ
!
r; ~ .l
i.
~.
_..
• ' .
.
. .. _ .,.
_.._ ...
....,...,....r...,.M...__..._.~ ~...~.,_,._.,._...
_... _ \
__ ............._._.. .~,.. - - - - . .,___,_.. _...__._ , ._ ._ .. , _.
~ ..._.. _ ____ ___ ---~-
;.
' a,; _. ". .. _.. .. . ._. . ,
~i : , , . . ~ . r,
~, ~ ~ . ,
1 } ~ ; . ..: ~~L ,~ 827059 ~
':~% ~` .
~~ , ;
~~ ~ . . ,
~ i :,;.:: ~,:tceptinp, poi•tion on the West included in road.
;:; ~~ .. ,.. :~:xcepting therefrom that portion lyinp, Souther~eterly of the Northwester~y line of
'5;;~ ,.~, i;tnd described in a deed to the Orsnge County F1ood Control District~ recorded ~
:~ ~ ;.~~L~,r 1~+~ 19Ei0 in Nook j1~63~ page 289 of Official Records.
;~?~ ~~~~
~DM:.red
i~'~ . P.L'3tP~ 9DC~.OFI:'1. ~ , .
. ~~.1
/ ' i
~,
~ '~
• ~ "S
i
'
's
< '
~i
~ . • I r
~ ~ ;
! '
1
•
~. i
. . i
. .~ .;j
1
. f
1 .'
..
. ~
j
~ .
_
~ ~
• . , '
:j ?~
' . • ' Y
•
~
'
= •
.
~
•
: ..
_
.
.
.
_ ~~
~
..._ .. _ _ . .
. .
_..
,_.
.. .
.. _
..
_ __ -- ___.-.___ _.__.. ,
.
'
~
___~_. _..-._ .~ _._
- ~ -- ~--~--- ~ ,
_-:.. _.. -~ :c,: y,~ . ~ ' . ~ i
- _ _ _ ~ _ . ~ . .. .. . .. . . T1W:4S ' ~~ ~ ..'-r. ' . ~
~.
.__._ - ~
NOW, THEREFORE, SE IT RESOLVED tha! the Maheim City Plenning Commiesion does hereby recommend
to the City Council of the City of Mahelm that eubject Petikion for Ftecleaei~cation be denied on the besis of the
eforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is aigaed end eppeoved liy me this 7th day of January, 1963„
~ '
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ~
ATTEST: ~
~ J .
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CTTY PLANNING COMMISSION
STf+TE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann [~sebs~ Secretary of the City Plenning Commission of 4he City of Aneheim, do he:eby certify thet the fore-
going cesolution wes paesed and ~adopted et e meeting of the City Plenning Commi~sion oE the City of Aneheim, held on'
January 7~ 1963~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by t}~e following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSION*;RS: Allred, Chavos, Gauer, Marcoux, Mungall, Pebley, Perry.
NOES: C~MMISSIONERS: None. .
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Camp, Hapgood.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have.hereunto set my hend this 7th, day of January~ 1963.
I ~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
.,