Loading...
PC 1962-1963-649~ ~ - ----~--- - . ~ ;~~ `~, ~i ... _ , ~~' ~ ~ ~ ) ~ RESOLUTION N0. 649, SERIES i9b2-63 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING C01@lIVIISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIOI3AL USE PERMIT 37~ BE GRANTED WHERE6S, tfie City PleaninR Commission of the City of Aaeheim did receive a verified Petition for Conditionel IIse Fe~itfmm ARTHUR and EIAISE HORMAN, WILLIAM A. and LUCILLE E. HAYNES, RALPH F. HARING znd 3AMES WESTRUM, 2139-C West Ball Road, Anaheim, California, Owners; J RICHARD HUFFMANS 2134-C West Ball Road, Anaheim, California, Agent of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, Couni:y of Orange, State.of California, described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and referred to herein as though set forth in full ; ead WHEREAS, the City Plaaaing Commission did 6old a public headng at the City Hail in the City of Aneheim on February 18~ 1963~ et ?.:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public hearing having been duly given as cequired by law aad ia accordance with the pmvisions of the Anaheim N,unicipal cude, Cheptec 18.64, to heac and consider evidence for aad agaiasY said proposed conditional use and to iavestigate and meke findings and recommendetions in connr.ction theze+vitfi: and . WFIEREAS, ~sud Commissioa, aEter due inspectioa, investigation, and study made by itself end in its behalf, and a$er dne cov.sideration of ell evideace and reports offered et seid hearing, does find end determine the following fects: i. 'C6at the p:oposed nse i» pmpecly oae for which a Conditional .Use Permit is authodzed b this Code, to W;` constzuct a two-stary planned unit multiple family d2velopment with carpor~s on subject property. 2. Thet the pcoposed use will aot adveisely affect the ad9oining lead uses and the Rmwth aad development of the acea in which it is proposed to be located. 3. T7iat the size and shape of the site pcoposed foe the u~a ia adequete to allow the full development of the pcoposed nse in a maaner not detrimeatc+l to the pecticulac area nor to the peace, health, safety, end geaeral welfere of the Citizens of the City oi Anaheim. . S. Tfiat the Qcanting of the Conditionai Use Permit under the conditions imposed, if eny, will not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety, aad general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Aneheim. 5. That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden vpon the streets and highways designed and improved ~.~. ~~TTj/ the traffic in the area. 6a That two persons appeared in opposition to sub3ect petition, one of whom presented a petition signed by thirty-four (34) persons opposing subject petition. CI G . ,~~ - ~ ' _ _ _._ -l- ------------ _ - - ----._.._--- ---------- -..........,._- -- ' . ~ • ` ~ ) NOW, THEREFORE, BE TT RFSOLVED that the Anafieim City Planning Commission does heceby gcant subject Petition for Coaditional Use Pecmit, npon tfie following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the pmposed use of the snbject propecty ia oxder Lo pzesecve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim: 1. Subject to the reciassizication of subject property to the R-3, Multiple Family Residentialy Zone as apoaoved imder P~tition for Reclassification No. 62-63-75. _ ~ THE FOREGOING RFSOLUTTO~I is signed and appmved by me this 18th day of February, 1963. ~ %>~i~.~ SECRETARY ANAHEIM CTTY PLANNING C03mQSSION STATE OF CALIF012NIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Ann Krebs, Sec:etaxy of the Ciiy Planaing Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolntion was passed aad adagted at a meeting of Use City Planning Commission ofthe City of Aneheim, held on February 18, 1963, at 2:00 o'clodc P.M., bq the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: CO~~:~ERS: Allred, Camp, Chavos, Gauer, Marcoux9 Mungall, Pebley, Perrya NOES: COt~4SSIONERS: None. ABSENT: CO~'ASISSSO?ZERS: Hapgood, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hareheceanto set my hand this 18th day of February~ 1963. SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION i ATTEST: RESOLLITION 1Q0. 649 C2-G -2- ~:~.--:~..-~c~i