PC 1962-1963-664/
A_, .
c,,
's.3
~~ ~ . .. - r•-
i';
~~. ,
,~
A RESOLIITION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOA'IAtENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF TFig C~T~' OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. 62-63-°~ BE APPROVED
I' WHEREAS, the City Pianning CommissYOn of the City of Aneheim did recelve a verified Petitioa for Reclassiflce-
tionfrom CHARLES V. A1dADOR, 2628 West 78th Street, Inglewood, California, Owner; BLAS MARFON~
741 North Pauline, Anaheim, California, Agent of certa~n real property situated in the City
~ of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California as ~escribed in Exhibit "A" attached heret~
and referred to herein as though set forth in full
; and
WHEREAS, the City P1ennIng Commission did hold e public hearing at the City Hell in the City of M~heim on
March 4, 1963~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of said public hearing heving been duly given as required by
law and in accordflnce with the provisions of the Maheim Municipel CoBa, ChaQter 18.72, to henr end consider evidence
for and against said proposed reclassiGcetion and to investigate and make findings end recommeadations in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspectioa, investigetion, and study mede by itself snd in its behelf, end
after due consideretion af ull evidence and reports oEfered at seid hearing, does find and determine the foliowing facts:
1. Thet the petitior.er proposes e reclassification of the nbove described propee4y from the R-A, ReSidential
Agricultural, Zone to the R-3, Multiple Family Residential, Zone to permit the construction
of a multiple family residential develnpment on subject property.
2. That the u:oposed reclassification of subject pmperty is necessery and/or desirable tor t}:e orderly end pro-
per development of the comm~nity.
3. That the proposed reclassiGcation of subject propecty does pmpedy relete to the zones end their permitted
uses locally esteblished in close proximity to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generelly estelr ~
lished throughout the rnmmunity. •
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject proFerty does require dedication
for and standard imorover..ant of abutting streets because said property does relate to `
and abut upon streets and highways which ar.e proposed to carry the type and quantity of
traffic, which will be generated by the permitted uses, in accordance with the circulation !
element of the General Plano
i
5~ That the approval shall apply to Parcel No. 1 only, and that the requested
reclassification of Parcel No. 2 is denied because no plans of development have been sub- ~
mitted in conjunction with said parcel.
6o That no one appeared in opposition to subject petition. ~
/
J
Rl-A _1_
f
r
i
RESOLUTION NO. bb4, 5t1iiE5 1962-63 ~
/
. i ~F.. ``"5.
( - ' ' - ' ~-i `~y'
_ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City P'leaning Commission does nereby recommend
~ to the City Council of the City of Aneheim thet subject Petition for Reclessi6cation be appraved and, by so doing,
f that Title 1&Zoning of the Anaheim Municipal Code be amended to excluda the above described ptoperky from the
i R-A9 Residential Agr.iculturaly_Zone and to incorporate above described property in the
R-3, Multiple Fam"ily Ftesidential, Zone ~n Par.cel Noo 1 on'ly, upon the following conditions
' which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of subject property
~ in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim~
's lo Dedication of thirty-two (32) feet from the monumented centerline of Sycamore Street (30
~~ feet existing„)
, 2~ Payment of $2~00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Sycamore Streeto
3,. Installation of sidewalks and driveways on Sycamore Street in accordance with the adopted
stand~rd plans on file in the office of the City Engineero
4. ?ayment of a Park and Recrea•tion Fee of $25000 per. dwelling unit to be collected as part of
the &uilding Permit~
5. Provision of standard trash storage areas as determined by the Department of Public Works,
Sanitation D£vis3on, prior io Final Building Inspection„
b'o Provision of a three (3) foot o•verhang easement along the westerly boundary of the subject
property to adequai:ely serve the subject property and other properties, at the time of the
installation of the service facilities~
7o Time limitatiott of one hundred and eighty (180) days for th~ accomplishment of Item Nos.
:~, 2, and 3~ '
8~ Developmeni: si~bstantially in accordance with.Revisian Noo,.ls Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4.
9,. Installation of a six (6) foot masonry wall along the western boundary and along the north-
erly portion of the sou•thern boundary of sub~ect property prior to F3na1 Bvilding Inspection.
10~ Subject to the approval of Variance Iuo. 15530
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and epproved by me this 4th day of March~ 19630
. CHAII2MAN ANAHEIM CITY P dING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
Ci~ ~~'~V ~V ~,~J~~c~`i/
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLE4INING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA . )
COUNTY CF OR~NGE ) ss~
CITX OF ANAHEIM )
I y Ann Krebs, Secretary of the City Planning c;~ammission of the City of Meheim, do heceby certify that the foce-
going resolution was passed and edopted at a meeting of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Aneheim, held on
Ma'rch 4, 1963~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof:
~YES: COhfMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Chavos, Craig, Gauer, Mungall, Pebley, Sides.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Nor,e~
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Perry..
II~ WITNESS WHEREOF, I have heceuntu set my hend this 4th day of lAarch, 1963.
/
SECRETARY ANAHEIM Cl'TY PLANNING COM?AISSION
R~SOLUTION N0.664
R~-A
-2-
_.,..__,...._.. _. .. .
_..._. __......___ __ _._-------..~. ..___..... ~___
~ _ ._ ~
. _._ _., _._.....__.:,<~
,i