PC 1962-1963-675/
•'.~
t;.
: `, I
.,
,
;5=;~ ;
'"x
~, ~.
RESOLUTIQN NO. 675, SERIES 1963
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 1554 gE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commission of the City of Meheim did receive a vedfied Petition for Verience
from MR. and MRSo PAUL MITTMANN~ 748 North Pine, Anaheim, California, Oumers of certain
real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, de-
scribed as Lot No. 15 in Tract No. 1525, and further described as 748 North Pine, Anaheim,
California
; end
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public headng at the City Hall in the City of Aneheim
on hlarch 18~ 1963 at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public henring heving been duly given es required
by law and in eccordence with the provisions of the Aneheim Municipal Code, Chepter 18.68,to hear and consider
evidence for and ageinst said proposed varience and to invea~igate and meke findings and recommendations in connec-
tion therewith; and
WHEREAS, seid Commission, efter due inspection, investigation, ead study made by itself and in its behelf,
end aEter due corsidecation of all evidence and reports offered es seid hearing, does find and detecmine the following
f actss
1. That the~petitioner requests a variance from the Anaheim Municipel Code: Section 18.20.010 (2~ ~ which
stipulates a required distance of eight (S) feet between the main building and accessory
buildings, to permit the addition of a family room to an existing residence to within four
(4) feet of an existing garage on subject property.
2. Thet there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions epplicable to the propecty involved
or to the ir.f~nded use of the property thet do not epply generelly to the property or class of use in the same vicinity
and zone.
3. That the requested varience is necessery for the pieservetion end enjoyment of a substential pmperty right
poasesaed by other propedy in the same vicinity and zone, and deni~d to the ptoperty in question.
4. That the requested varience will not be meterially detrimentel to the public welfate or lnjurious to the pmp-
edy or imp:ovements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is located.
5. Thet the cequested vedance will not adveraely affect the Comp:ehensive Genewl Pian.
6. That no one appeared in opposition to subject petition~
~ Vl-G
F
~
{
r,
-1-
}`"~
.., :.
. ~?~,' i
''.~+ .
.~
l' .1
4 y~
~ jl
'``!«
. ._. ~. . .. .. ... ~
/
:,: - -
}'
~
;;
r ~f
~ ' ~'-^`' J ..f
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Aneheim City Planning Commission dues heceby grent subject
Petitioa for Varience, upon the following conditions which ere hereby found to be a necessery prerequisite to the pro-
posed use of the subject property in ordet to preserve the seEety and general welfere of the Citizens of the City oE
Meheim.
?.. Development substantially in accordance wi•~h Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed end approved Ly me this 18th day of March, 1963.
~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PL ING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann iCrebs~ Secretary of the City Plenning Commiasion of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the fo:e-
going cesolutIon was passed nnd adopted et a meeting of the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim, heid on
March 18~ 1963, at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the membecs thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Chavos, Craig,,Gauer, Mungall, Pebley, Perry,
Sides.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hend this 18th day of March~ 1963.
RESOLUTION NO. 675
V2-G
j
`-- _-.-•--.._n--.~_~ _,-•~77 1~
~{~
G~i2" ' ., " _
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
_2.
----.....--°-_.._. i
i
._---._.._.,......_... ~~~
____.--.- .
µ~