Loading...
PC 1962-1963-681i: +i 1... ~ i • ? i ;- a _1 RGSOLUTION NO. 68I, SERiES 1962-03 A RFSOLUTiO~I OF THE CTTY PLANNIIQG COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEAt THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 388 BE DENIED WHEREAS, the City pleaaing Commission of the City of Aaaheim did receive a verified Petitioa for Conditional UsePeffiitfrom p[JCI.ID ~pppl~-, CENTER~ et al, 2293 West Ball Road, Anaheim, Cai:.fornia, OuTers; H. RALPH IAVE?T, ~7L1 Durfee Avanue, ?ir_c Rivera, California, Age~t of certain real property situated in ±he City of Anaheim, County of Orange, S~ate of Califo.rnia, descr?bed as PARCEL DA. 1: La~ Nos_ 3 and 4 of Te,mser,d's Subdivision, as sho-,m on a~uap =ecorded ~n i:ook 5, page 40, Liiscellaneoas Maps, records of said Orange Countyg EXCEPTING from saic: Lot No. 3, the West 203 feet of the IYerth 210 feet thereof, measured to it~e cent~rline of streetse PARCII. N0. 2s Lot No. 9 of Taxnsnend's S+~bdiv:sion, as shown on a map recorded in book 5, page 40, L4iscel~aneous ldaps, zecords of said Orange County ; and :r I :;f I :''i i ;-i / ,~ '~ i ~.J . 'j--~--, ; i WHERF.AS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on MarCh i$, 19b3~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by lew and in ac~x~aace witfi the pcovisions of the Anaheim ~Sunicipal Code, Chapter 18.64, to hear and cronsider evidence for aad agaiast said proposed conditional use and to invc~~tigate and make findings and recommeadations in conaection thetecaith; aad WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigetion, and study made by itself and in its behalf, aad after dne caasidecation of all evidence aad reports offered at said hearing, does find and detecmine the following fads: 1. ~hat the proposed nse is properly one for which a Conditional Use Permit is authorize~ by this Code, to wit: establish~nent of a drlye-irt theater and sign on su'nje:i. property~ 2• Iha: '-~te ~zoposed use will adlerse.} affeot the adjoining land us?s and ihe growth c~nc ~=vg_op:aen~ o£ 'hF;.~rea in which it is proposed to be located. ~ Th.'a_ the Aria~ein; M;~r.icipal Code provides ±c.r tne establishment. of d~ive-in thea;ezs :r. '~ °1~-1, .T_~5~h: Ind~~sr:i>.l, ~.one s~bjec± tc :or:di~io::e~i .;se permit approval, said zone being d~med ~_~e ;?~s± des?;iac1F :~rea in which ~o locate 3~.y p~oposed ~~ea~er. 4• ~^°~= i`?~ P=oP~.1~.^• ~:I~Fe-in theater ~nould t~e an ircompatihle land use zn an area com..;~sed or singte 'a:_1y ar.d neigt,borhood cormnercial developments. ~. ?r_,at .'ive (") persens, representing a large nu~r~ber of persons present in ti~e Couaci~ C '~~. a~~dressed the ~o~ission, and a petition signed by seven-hundred four (704) perscns v,, =~~~-~,ed _' -~~'sition to subject petition~ Cl-D _i_ _ _-- - ------- -- ~ ~ ; - ~. ::~. ._ J i ~ ~ . . • 1 a :;~;=;. ;~. , . ;;, .. ~ '~ ; --.} ~,_~ NOW, THERErORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Plenning Commission does hereby deny subject Petition foc Conditionel Use Permit on the besis of the eforementioned fiadings. THE FORFGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me.this i8~ • ay of Marc.h, .1953,~ , . j ' CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PL NING COMMISSION ATTEST: SECRETARY ANAHEIM C1TY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Ann Ktebs~ Secretary of the City Planning Commission of the Ciry of Anaheim, do heceby cerUfy that the fore- going resolution was passed end adopted at a meeting of the City Plartning Commission of the City of Anaheim, heid on Ma'rch 18~ 1963~ , et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the tollowing vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ~A11:red, Can;~., Cr .a•r~~5, f'raig, Gauer, Mungall, Pebley, Per.ry, Sides~~ NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None., 'ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Nor.e~ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve heceunto set my hand thie Y8'.ih da'y of March, ':9ti3.. ~ I SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. 681 C2-D "2" f. f