PC 1962-1963-685RESOLUTION NO. 665, SERIES 1962-63
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERNIIT NO. 384BE DEPIIED
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commisaion of the Ciry of Aaeheim did receive a verified Petition for Conditional
Uae Pecmit from MII.VIN Fa BENTJEN9 619 Buttonwood Avenue„ Anaheim, California, and AURTHE& "E.
BENTJEN, 439 Barkley, Orange, California, Owners; LeROY ROSE, AIA, 600 North Euclid Street,
Suite 686, Anaheim, California, Agent of certain real property situated in the City of Ana-
heim, County of Orange, State of C~lifornia, described as Lot Noo 10 of.the Anaheim Homestead
Tract, as shown on a map thereof recorded in book 26, page 10, Miscellaneous Records of Los
Angeles County, California; EXCEPTING I'HEREFRObi the North 630088 feet, measured from the .
centerline of the 60-foot stree•t coimnonly known as North Street
; aad
WHEF.EAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hell in the City of Aneheim on
MarCh 18~ 1963~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of said public heariag haviag been duly given es requiced by
lew ead in accotdence with the provisions of the Aneheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.64, to hear aad consider evideace
for ead egainat said proposed conlitional use and to investigate and make Eindings and reeommendations ia connection
Yhecewith; snd
WHEREAS, seid Commission, after due inspectiAn, investigatioa, ead study made by itself end ia its behelE,
and efter due coneidesation of ell evideace end reports offe~ed et seid hearing, does fiad and detecmiae the followiag feds:
1. Thet the propoaed use is propecly one for which a Conditional Use Pecmit is suthorized by this Code, to wit:
establish a two-story planned multiple family residential development with carports and waiver
of parking requirements on subject prop~rtyo
2o That the proposed use will adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the growth
and development of th~ area in which it is proposed to be locatedo
3. That the proposed development is incompatible to the low density residential develop- ~
ment adjacent to and in close proximity to subject propertya _
4. That the proposed development is in conflict with the past policies of the Cotmnission '
as reflected on ~he proposed General Plan„
5. That three (3) persons, repres2nting a large number of persons present in the '
Council Chamber, addressed the Commission, and a petition signed by one hundred fifty-two
(152) persons was received in opposition to subject petitiono ;
Cl-D
-1-
a a.;~
~ .-~ . _
, ~
__..__ _._..__._---__ _..,.,..___....._____..___.._.._...__..__._,._..----.-___.
~~..~ -_..___---- -
;
~ _.1
~
NOW,.THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Anaheim City Plenning Commission does heieby diaiy subje~:t
PetiUon for Condltlonel Use Permit on the basis of the eforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and epproved by me.this 18th day of March, 1963.,
. • ~ ~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PL NING COMMISSION
~
ATTEST:
1~;5~'~/ j
SECRETARY ANAH~IM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) j
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. ~
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krgbs, SecrEtary of the City Plenning Commission oE the City o: P.naheim, do hereby certify that the fore-
going resoluGon was pasaed and adopted et e meeting of the City Plenning Commisaion of the City of Anaheim, held on >~
March 18~ 1963~ , at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following ~~ote of the membe:s thereof: '
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Chavos, Craig, Gauer, Mungall, Pebley, Perry,
i
Sides~
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None~
i
'ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Nonea
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve heceunto set my hand this 18th day of March~ 19630
`i
%~~y e~vl/~'U,,J
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ~;
RESOLUTION N0.685 (
C2-D '2' I 4
~~
, 1
'
{
~~ . i
t
1
~ ----T.... __ ._ _______._ .. _._.__ .___ _....._•---~---- _-- ....._._._
_ _ ~_ ~ _- --- ~----- ~
_- v;::
.. ., ... ._ -6~~"9W . ~ ~ ~s~' .