PC 1962-1963-738f M
,~ ~ ~ ~
' RESOLUTION N0. 738s SERIES 1962-63
A RESOLUITON OF THE CiTY PLANNING COhiMYSSIGN OF THE CTTY OF ANkHEIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE NO. 1568 BE GRANTED
:i •
r.i
il
;; WHEREAS, the City ~lanning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a veri~ied Petition for Variance
° from H. E. Wo and ROBERT S. BARNES9 310 Emerald Bay, Laguna Beach, California, Owners;
'-.~ ROBERT S. AARNES, 1016 Noxth Broadway, Santa Ana, California, Agent of certain reai
~~ property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as
~ described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and referred to herein as though set forth in full
; end
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing et the City Flall in the City of Anaheim
on April 29, 1963, at 2:00 a'clock F.M., notice of said public heering heving 6een duly given es requi:ed
by law end in accordence with tfie provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapfer 18.68,to hear end consider
evidence for end ageinst said proposed variance and to investigate end meke findings and recommendations in connec-
tion therewith; and
WHEREAS, said CommissIon, after due inspection, investigetion, aad study made by itself end in its behelf,
end aEter due consideration of all evidence and reports offered as seid hearing, does find and dete:mine the following
facts:
1. That the petitioner re~uests a va:iance fmm the Anaheim Municipel Code: Section 18032.080 (3) ~ which
requires a rear yard of not less than twenty-five (25) feet in depth and Section 18032.120,
which requires 1-~ garages per dwelling unit, to permit the establishment of an apartment
building with carports~ "
2. That thece are exceQtional or extrao~dinery ciccumstences or conditions appliceble to the prope~ty involved
or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to the pmperty or ciess of use in the same vicinity
and zone.
3. ~'het the :equested variance is necessary foe the pceservation and enjoyment of e substantial property right
possessed by other property in the seme vicinity and zone, end denied to the propecty in question.
4. Thnt the requested varience will not be materially detrimentel 4o the public welfate or injurious to the prop~
erty or improvements in such vicinity and zone in which the propedy is located.
5. That the requested varience will not adversely aff~ct tne Comptehensive General Plan. ',
6.. That no one appeared in opposition to subject petition. ,
Vl-G
-1-
~ __._....._....__._ ..,.
_. . . ~'..::; ~. ~ ~ :':~i
~ ............._ ...,..~........,. _.._......_.__.._._. ,.....,_.
. ., ...._ .
_ .. ..._ _
~' ___ _ __. _ _.---... _. __,...
~ • ~ DE"Cfi~'TTOIJ:
r°' i'
*.11 ~~'t cert~in Zc~` ~ s3tusted in the Stat~ oP CAlii~. _~ ie~ Co+=.^t~ oP Orange~
City of F.aoi;cir~~ dcsex3bed as Pollowa:
i ' '
~' '~at porition of Sec~fots ~' Tovnsh:tp k South~ Ranga 10 West S. B. B. & P~4.
descrlbc3 as ~ollotas:
;' ~ginnizkr., ~t a Po3nt 3n 'Che t:~3t line of Fnt 10 af ~itles Rraancho~ a~ shawn ou
0 2L~,~~ recorc2ecl in Eoos ~+~ paGG 7 of R~.scellnn~ouc Mopc, records ot Oren~e
County, C~1.3~'ornia, seic? poi~t, bein~ I.oca'ted 574.94 :eet ~tor~h 0° 10" 0~" 47ost
troa ~'r.e S~uthzrect corner nP naid Y,ot 10~ sa3d C~uthuest eor«e: ~i~q ~'~
intereectioa oP the center lines oS roudc a~ c~houn on u b:ap P32ed in Eao}; ~~
P~fe 75 ~F Recorcl of• R~rt~ey~ in t1~e oi'Plce ef the County T,ecorcl~r oP Or3n~e
CovntY, CaliPnr:~la, ~nd runn3ng thencc Sout}~ ~° 10' 00" EasL ~7 Yeet aloa~ the
T~~e~terl;/ 13ne a£ EQic3 T,at 7.p~ csid ],ina ~e3nt; tl~n ecnter 11ne oP e rosd en ~.
shoir~ oa sc3c3 N.~p f31ed in I~ol; l~ ro4Q ~S uf fiecorcl of Surveya ia ~he oFfice
o~ the Gounty Recorder of Oraaae r~~~;y~ CE].ifaraia; t.hence ~;esterly, perallel
~Y.~~h the ~~trF.h ],qnc aP the innd conv~y~ecl to Jo~eplt pnclser end w:t~e by deed
;~ . P3Ied I'.i:y 20, 19k£3 E~t Docu~ent No. 16 ,\.
Titles of qrcn~;e C~,;anty, pa~ro~~n, '~~~ i~; ~Q ofPice oP tho Regiatrar oY
a~ral].e1. vith ~ ,. . 1FC se~tj thence North 0 10° 00" T-;eaL.
P ,~nid bte~ter~y linc ~: I~at 10' S7 ~eet to the 6outh liaQ oP eai8
lr~nd convayed to ~*oEeph~ P~cIser_ ~nd wit~oj theACe Eastor~}r eloag anid SouCh 11ae3
` lv'J SeQL W~Ghe point oS b~glnnina.
~ • ~ . . ,
i . +~' ~t 8 ~! '
~' L:~fiSgr .. ,
,
;~ .
ji ~
G
1.
~ .. I
4.; .
. . ~
t ,._.._... ._.._... -...
.... ,. . . ..__~_ _,_~,.... ____,_._..._.._ _ ._.. _.__ _ --__ ___ ..__.. ____ __. _ _..:_--.
~; ~~ .
~~~~~ ~~~~'~`~i~~ ~mm~~~'
MAIN STR£ET AT FIFTH, SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA • KIMBERLY 7•6892
• 2.ir. R. S. Eo,rcea Our No. g 2
I PRELIMINARY REPORT I~inde2 E~ ~lnCer~c,n _ ,, 3 555
• 3AlG Iior~ch I3io~c~way
Issued for Sole Use ~of Senta t~na, Cnl:S'or~ia Your No.
~ in connection with your application for a Policy of Title Insurance on the title to the land hereinafter described,
! this report is issued as an accommodation, and is made without liability and without obligation to issve such Policy.
Statement of charges will be rendered when Policy is issued, or ninety days from entry of application, .if Policy
J is not issued prior to that time.
~ Dated as of Z•Z%TC$ 25~ l.g'o3 at 8:00 A.M:• .
~ , ,~/' ~f3ANG~~ Y TITLE COMPANY•
~ J!'f . .
j , By
. ~~ s ~Z~ TiTIE OFFICER
!. vESTEE: R0.:~7~T S. B11F1~S, u asrried ~.ns aad II. E~ H. BAF~~, an unraarziet! man~ :
~ Qee2i ~n unciivi@ect otte~brlf i~t~creat~ by deed to tliam dntad Fobru~zy 25s 19~3• ,
_,.,.._. _:_., .. ... . _..._._ _._ ._---
_. _ __ _ -- -- ...._ ._ _
-_._...._ .._ ..
. _, _
~ .- --
___ ._____._._
- ~ -..._.__-__.._-----_..__._..__._...Y~__:
. . - - ...., ~'F'.~ . . ~ • . ~~
~. " . ~ . . . ";~ . 1 . E
~~ ~ i ~
~~ ~ ~V ~ ~;~ ~~ ~
; t~
. . . -....___. _
....._.__..., ._..._....:.~..__..__....__..__._....----..._....__._.__...r...._...------.~._.__.--._._._.._.. ..._ . .
~ '~ '
E ~ ': ? ~_,)
, .
~ NOW, THEREFORE, ~E IT RESOLVED that the Aneheim City Plenning Comr~ission does hersby grant subject
Petition for Verience, upon the following conditions which are heceby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the pm-
' posed use of the subjecY propecty ie ordar to pteserve the safety end generel welfere of the Citizens of the City of i'
:
Aneheim. ~
;'
'- 1. Development substantially in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 1 through 4.
~
2. Subject to the reclassification of subject property to the R-3, Multiple Family
I~ Residential, Zone as approved and completed under Reclassification No. 62-63-2.
3. Provision that the rear and side walls of the proposed carports shall be stuccoed,
enclosed storage cabinets shall be provided at the rear wall of each carport, and that '
~ adequate bumpex guards shall be provided tb protect the interior wall of the proposed
carports from clamage.
THE FOREGOING PcESOLUTION is signed and epproved by me this 29t ay of April, 1963.
J
CHAIRMAN ANAFiEIM CITY PL G COMMISSION'
ATTEST:
~~~~~,~L/ ~~~`~
SECRETARX ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) se.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs, Seccetary of the Clty Planning Commissior of the City of Aneheim, do heceby cedify that the fore-
going resolution wea pessed end adopted et a meeting oF the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim, held on
April 29~ 1963~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the membera thereoE:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Chavos, Gauer, Mungall, Pebley, Perry, Sides.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None.
IN WITDIESS W'iEREOF, I have hereunto set my hend this 29th day of April~ 1963.
~/~~/ ~/~! ji GC/l~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION N0.738
V2-G
- -- ~ _ _. ..._.- -------... ___ _..._.;
_ .- -~-~ _ .;:;:;
~
-2-
i
- . --- ;,~: