PC 1962-1963-739• , 1 ~
RESOLUTION NO
°~~.. }
739,SERIES 1962-63
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMYSSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIIM
THAT PETITION FOR VARIANCE N0.1569 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, tha City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did ceceive a vedfled Petition for Variance
from HAROLD L. RAAB, 2741 Orange Avenue, Anaheim, California, Owner; DOROTHY R. FULMER,
2105A West Bail Road, Anaheim, California, Agent of certain real property situated in the
City of Attaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as Lot No. 4 in Tract
No. 2864, and further described as 2741 Orange Avenue, Anaheim, California
; and
' 7~ I
xt
:i
>,l
~.o ~
~ ~
C a.,...-.,m„
~;.
~
F?.
r.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Aneheim
on April 29~ 1963 at 2:00 o'clock P.M., notice of seid public hearing having been duly given es required
by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Aneheim Municipel Code, Chepter 18.68,to hear and consider
evidence for and egainst said proposed veriance end to investigote and make findings and recommendations in connec-
tion therewith; and
WHEREAS, seid Commisslon, after due inspection, investigation, and study made by itself end in its behelf,
and after due considecation of all evidence end reports offered es said heering, does find end detennine the followin~r
facts:
1. That the petitioner requests a va~ience from the Aneheim Municipal Code: Section 16a24.030 (3-b)9
which stipulates the minimurti rear yard requirement, to permit the construction of a family
room~
2. Thet there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstences or conditions appliceble to the property involved
or to the intended use of the property thet do not epply generelly to the property or cless of use in the seme vicinity
end zone.
3. Thet the requested vecience is necessary for the pceservation and enjoyment of a suhstential property right
possessed by other propedy in the same vicinity end zone, and denied to the property in questlon.
4. That the requested vexience will not be meterially detrimeniel to the public welfate or injucious to the pmp-
erty or impcovements in such vicinity and zone in which the property is loceted.
5. That the requested vasience will not advecsely efEect the Comprehensive Generel Plen.
6. That no one appeared in opposition to subject petition.
Vl-G ~ -1-
--_..._..._---_~ _ ._ _ __ _.
~ ~
~
,~
I ~
~
r ' j ~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Ansheim City Plaaniag Commission does hereby graat subject
Petltian for Vacieace, upon the foliowiag conditioas which are 6aeby famd to be a aeeessary prereqnisite to the pro-
posed use of the subject property in order to pteserve the safety and gme:a! celfate of the Citizens of the City of
Anaheim.
1. Development substantially in accordance i,rith r~-chib;t Nos. 1 and 2.
THE FOREGOING RESOI:UTION is-signea and approved by cse tfiis 24th day of April, 1963.
.
CHAgtME1N ANAHEIM CTfY P G COMMISSION
ATTEST:
/~~~„~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PL~INNING CaI~IISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs, Secretary oF the City Planning Commissioa of the City of Aaafieim, do her:by certify that the fore-
going tesolution was passed and adopted at a neeting of the Cit3 Plaaaing C~~_tion of the City of Aaeheim, held on
April 29~ 1963~ et 2:00 o'clock P.M., bq the following vete of tee memims tfiereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Gauer, ldungalZ, Pebley, Sides.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None. •
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Chavos, Perry.
IN 1VITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereuato set my haad Uus 29th day of April, 1963.
_!~!~~~~
~
SECRETARY ANAHEIA~ CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 739
V2-G _~
~
i
_._.__~_ i 9
.. ~j„ - ' . . .S