PC 1962-1963-746. .._ ,. _.,,__.._- -._--
_.._-------------.~
__.._._.._
-----
~•.~ ~`- _
~ -' ~ ~
; ,
.. ti
RESOLUTION N0. 746~ S~IES 1962-63
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COGTMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT
PETITIaN FOR RECLASSIFICATI~N N0.62-63-106 gg qppROVED
WFiEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim did receive a verified ~etition for Reslassifica-
tion from IiERBHRT F. SHUNK and DQROTHY A. SHUIVg, 425 North Dale Avenue, ,Anaheim, California,
Owners of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim. County of Orange,
5tate of California, described as:The Northerly 172.00 feet of the Southerly 332.00 feet
of the Hasterly 270.00 feet of the northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section
13, Township 4 South Range 11 West, in the Rancho Los Coyotes, as shown on a map recorded
in book 51, page 11 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of Orange County, California, the
Northerly line of said 332 feet being parallel with the Southerly line of said Northeast
quarter of the Southeast quarter of said Section 13
; and
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commisaion did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
Apri1 29, 1963, at 2:00 o'clock P.M. notice of said public hearing heving been duly given es required by
law and in acccrdance with t},e provisions of the Maheim Municipel Code, Chepter 18.72, to hear and consider evidence
for end ageinst said proposed reclassificetion and to investigate and make Gndings and recommendetions in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigetion, and study mede by itself and in its behalf, and
after due consideration of all evidence rjnd reports offececi at said hearing, does find and deizrmi~re the following facts:
1. Thst the petitioner proposes a reclessification of the above described property from the R=A~ Residential
Agricultural, Zone to the R-1, One Family Residential, Zone.
2. That the proposed reclassificetion of subject property is necessary and/or desirable for the orderly and pro-
per development of the community.
3. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does pmperly relate to the zones and their,r,err.,itted
uses locally established in close proximity to subject property end to the zones and their permitted uses generally esteb-
lished throughout the community.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does require dedication
for and standard improvement of abutting streets ber,ause said property does relate to and
abut upon streets and highways which are proposed to carry the type and quantity of traffic,
which will be generated by the permitted uses, in accordance with the circulation element
of the General Plan.
5. That no one appeared in opposition to subject petition.
Rl-A
-1-
I
i ~
~ ~
;~ :,
~ ~.
i . °°~
~
.:,,.. ....,, ,.
!t' ,~ . _ .,..-.,.
~
( ) ; ~'f
NOW, TIiEREFORE, BE IT FiESOLVED tht~t the Aneheim City F~lanning Commissioa does he~eby rernmmend
to the City Council of the City of Aneheim thet sub)ect Petitioa for Reclassification be epproved end, by so doing,
thet Title 1&Zoning of the Aneheim Mlunicipal Code be amended to ezclude U~e ebove described property from the
R-A, Residential Agricultural, Zone and to incorporate said described property in the R-1,
One Family Residential, Zone upon the following conditions which a~e hereby found to be
a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of sub3ect property in order to preserve the
safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
1. Dedication of fifty-three (53) feet from the monumented centerline of Magnolia Avenue
(30 feet existing).
2. Preparation of street improvement plans and installation of all improvements for
Magnolia Avenue, subject to the approval of the City Engineer and in accordance with the
adopted standard plans on f ile in the office of the City Engineer.
3. Payment of $2.00 per front foot for street lighting purposes on Magnolia Avenue.
4. Payment of a Park and Recreation Fee of $25.00 per dwelling unit to be collected as
part of the Building Permit.
5. Filing of a Record of Survey to record the approved division of subject property~
6. Subje<:t to the approval of Petition for Variance No. 1567e
7. Time limitation of one hundred and eighty (180j days for the accomplishment of
Item-Noso 1, 2, 3, and 5.
8. Development substantially in accprdance with Exhibit Nos. 1 through 9.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and appmved by me this 29th day of April, 1963, ,
ATTEST:
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PL G COMMISSION
~~~~'"LC/w~/
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY CF OR~INGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Ann Krebs, gecrelary of the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim, do hereby certify thet the fore-
going resolution was pasaed end edopted et a meeting of the City Planning CommIssion of the City of Maheim, held on
April 29, 1963, et 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the members thereof;
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Allred, Camp, Chavos, Gauer, Pebley, Perry, Sides.
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None.
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: Mungall.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I heve hereunto set my hend this 29th day of April, 1963.
RESOLUTION N0.~46
- _L/~~V~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
R2-A ~ -2-