PC 1962-1963-759~ ~ - \ ~ ~ ~ . . . . .. , 1 ~ ~ . . . . . .. . , '
759 SERIi:S 1962-03 ~
RESOLUTION- NO. ~-
A RESOLUTION OF TYiE CITY PLA~'QNING COM1VlISSYON OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
T:IA': nETITION FOR CONDITIdNAL USE PERMIT NO. 418 BE DEHIED
WHERGAS, the City Plaztning Commission of the City of ~ineheim did receive a veri6e3 Petition for Conditior,al ;
Use Permit from JAtdFS and MOATICA L4AI~AAD:?, 503 Nlsst Vermont, Anaheim, California, Ownexs of
certain real property situated 3n the ~it~ of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, ~
described as Zot No. 20 of Tract No. 1142, and f::~~l;ar described as 549 West Hampshire, Anaheim, ~
California • I
3
i
~
. ~
1
~
i
i ~a ~
. ~
t
WHEREAS, the City Plenning Commissioa did hold e public heariag at the City Hell in the City of Anaheim on ~
May 13 ~ 1963 ~ • at 2:00 o'dock P.M., notlce o; seid public hearLtg having beep duly givea es required by ~
lew ead in accoidettce with the pmvisions of the Anaheim Muaidpel Code, Chepter 18:64, to hear and coasider evidence ~
for end agaiast aeid propoaed conditionsl use and to inveatigete and meke findings and recommendetiona in coanection 1
the:ewith; end
WHEREAS, said Ccmmissian: efter due iaspection, inveatigetion, and study made by itself end in its behalf, ~
end aEtee due conaidocation of all evldeace ead reports offered at aeid headng, does find aad determine the following f~ts: ~
,
~
1. Thet the proposed nse is ptonerly one ;-ur which a Conditional Use Permit is authorized by this Code, to wi[: i
rent an existing apartmen~ building on a daily, weekly, or monthly basis. ;
2. That the proposed use would be incompatible with the existi.ng residential uses
adjacent and in close proximity to sub3ect pxopexty. ~
3. That the proposed commercial use would violate the ir.tegrity of the existing ;
multiple family development in the vicinity of subject property. j
4. That the.approval of subject petition would be granting a privilege to the ~
petitioner which is noi: enjoyed by.other properties adjacent and i.n close proximity to ~
subject property. ~
5. That four (4) persons appeared,~and nina (9) letters were received in•opposition ta ;
sub~ect petition. ~
. 3
1
3
, j
~
~
'+'
_Y...-~- - .. ----i
'~l i
~ 3
~ ~
_ ,~
_ _. _. ._ _
~,,,t ----- ----- _._.--
.~_.._ '. . . .. .~ . . . ~. . - .. ~Gl7i. _-_ _ -__ _~_ ___ . ._:!,~
d: YJ~.~ I
~. ~' J
~.
~r--- .
, .. .
~ '7 ~~
V'
NOR',.THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED thet the Aneheim City Plenning Commission does hereby deny subject
Petition for Conditionel Use Perm?t on the besis of the aforemenGoned findings.
THE ;'O::EGOING RESOLUTION is slgned end epproved by me,this y of May~ 1963.
_ • i ~
CHAIRMAN ANAHEIM CITY PLAN G COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~~~~
SECRETARY ANAHEIIH CXTY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORllNG~ ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs, Seocetsry of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anehaim, do hereby certiEy thet the fore-
goidg resolution wes passed end adapted at e meeting of the City Plenning Commission of the City of Anaheim, heid on
May 13~ 1963~ , at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of the membets thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONE:RS: Allred, Camp, Chavos, Gauer, Mungall, Pebley, Ferry, Sides.
NOES: COMMISSIOtIERS: None.
, 'ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None.
IN WITNESS qRiEREOF, 3 heve he:uunto set my h9nd this 13th day of May, 19fs3.
• ~ •
~/ ~s'~? /
SECltETARY AN'AkEIM CITY PLANNYNG COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 759
C2-D _y.
.r.__.__ x,~:,- .. -„'- •-'~ -.-,
. . <"fi.' ~~ .. _ ..~ ~
:~~
~
~:
Se
S
i
f