PC 1962-1963-778.
: i '~f .
~ ;, - ~,
~.._' ,. .
- ..._--
.
. .......,r..,..,,~...,..~....~...,...~-- - ..._.._._.._..r..~..........,.+. ~«.~.u-.:,_ . .c:r_aq+.1+r.-~.wv.-.ra~.^. "i ,1'~!:r~ ~c::r•c!:». ..asa,...R...
.t. ..............~_'~'__ "
u'S`. ~ . ~ . . ..__ .. . ... . ......_ i
~ i
r' ;rf ~~ ~ ~
~: ,.;
~` RESOLUTION N0. 778~ SF.~2IES 1962-63
~; ~ ,
~i-
,--,
. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANP?ING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
• REC06iMENDL~TG TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF6'•2H-63Cj1150F ANAHEIM THAT
PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. BE AFPROVED
i
i
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Aneheim did receive a verified Petition for Reclassifica- i
tion from MATTH~lN E. K JUS't17t AJ1A~ 37i S~H a'rir=un E. SneLii~ 915 South ioara Jy1CCL~ ~part- j
___ ~ men± 2, Anaheim, Cali.fornia, Owners.of certain real pxflperty situated in the City of Ana-
F'~ ~ heim, County of Orange, State of California, described as Lot No. 28 of Tract No. 2114, and
_~~ further described as 911 South Loara Street, Anaheim, California
; and
~IEREAS, the City Plenning Commission did hold a~ublic hearing et the City Hell in the City of Anahaim on
May 27~ 1963~ et 2:00 u~clock P.M. notice of said public heering ha~ing been duly given c+s required by
law end in eccordeace with the pcovisions of the Anahe:m hi~:nicipel Code, Chapter 18.72, to hear end consider evidenee
for end ageinet said ptoposed reclassification end to investigate and maice findings end recommendetions in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commissioa, aEter due inspection, investigation, end study made hy itself end in its behelf, and
after due consideration of all evidence end repurtg offered et satd hearing, does Eind and determine the following .facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes a reclassification of the above described property from 4he R-1~ One Family
Residential, Zone to the R-3, Multiple Family Residential, Zone to establish a triplex.
2. That Lhe proposed reclessification of subject property is necessery end/or desicable foc the orderly end pro-
per devexopment of the community.
3. Thet the proposed reclassification of subject property does pcoperly relate to the zones and their permitted
uses locally established in close pioximity to subject property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally.estab-
lished threughouE the community.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does not require dedication
for and standard improvement of abutting streets because said property does relate to and
abut upon streets and highways which are improved to carry the type and quantity of traffic,
which will be.generated by the permitted uses, in accordance with the circulation element of
the General Plan.
5o That the proposed development will not be an encroachment on the single family
developmenc to the north since subject property has multiple family development abutting to
the south and viest, and that the one person opposing subject petition a~ttempted to purchase
subject property_for ultimate multiple family development.
Ri-A
._ _ _ - --- ~. --------i - - _ '_
._ r~
-1-
_ ._. __ .,;~;
I
~
~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~'' .. . , . . _ .. "~ ~ .
- ~ ~ ~ . ~ . . . ~ ~ . . ~ `--~-
.~ ~ _.._.__.,.~.. ~. _..__ ..................w~...,.._.~v.r..:,.:crn.a.~ ~ : .... ~~:.... _ . . " ~ ~c ~
. . ~RC_. ~n.:.. :.., ..~:_: .... n~.._:u...r ,. ,.. ~w~...._..,.__,__.
- . 1~ . -._-..-._.-'-.--'
t
~, ' ,A, ~~ ~,
• ~ ~.,".
~ PIOW, THEREFORE, B~ IT RESOLVED that the Aneheim Ciry Pleaniag Cammiesion does hereby ces.rommend
to the City Council of the City of Anaheim thet subject Petition for Recleasi8cation 6e appmved end, by ao doing,
that Title i&Zoning of the Meheim Munlcipal Code be emended to exclude the ebove desceibed property from the
~ ~~ R-1, One Family Residential, Zone and to incorporate said described property in the R-3,
Mvltiple Family Residential, Zone upon.the following conditions which are hereby found to
~~ ba a necess~ry prerequisite to the proposed use of subject property in order to preserve the
~ safety and gern~ral welfare of the citizens of the City'of Anaheim.
~~ 1. T};at.the owner of subject property sha11 pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $25.00
~~~ .. .ngr rlwo]linn tlnit~ tq hg ttgari fQr ~ark anri rosroaTinn r~yr~ngog~ gairl. amrnmt tn ha pa_Li at ±hc
~ ~ time the.building permit is issued.
~"`" ~1 2. . That trash _storage areas shall .be prov.ided in accordancs ~:rith si;andard plans on file
~~~ in the office of t}~ Director of Public Works, prior to Final Building Inspection. •
~; 3. That subject property..shall be developed•substantially in accordance with plans and
a"'r specifications on file.with the City of Maheim, marked "Exhibit No. 1" as amended.
°~~ 4. That a six.(6) foot masonry wall sha11 be constructed along the north property line
;~ abutting the R-1 Zone, except that said wall shall be reduced to forty-two (42) inches in
the required front yard of subject property, prior to fiinal Building Inspection.
THE FORF.GOING RESOLUTI6Pt is signed and approved by m~ thls 27th day of May~ 1963.
~4~-~~~2~'3~.2 ~C ~,~•up~ ,
P H~AIR~M~AN ANAHEIM ~ITY PLANNING COMd91SSlON 1 ~
ATTEST:
1
SECRETARY ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE Or' CniicORNIA )
COUNTY CF OR~INGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I~ Ann Krebs ~ Secretery of the City plenaing Commiasio~ -~ the City of Aaafieim, da hereby cettify thet the fore-
going resolution wes pasaed end adopted at a meeting of the City Pla,:nfng Commissior, of the City oi Anaheim, held on
May 27~ 1963~ at 2:00 o'clock P.M., by the following vote of u~e membei ; thereof;
,4YES: COhIMISSfOI~ERS: Allred, Chavos, Gauer, Mungall, Pebley, Perry, Rowland, Sides.
NOES: COMMISSICNCRS: None.
ABSTAINi ODMMISSIONERSe Camp.
AHSENT: COM6lfI"aSIONERS: None.
EN WITNESS F2AEREOF, I hev~ hereunta set my hand thi~ 27th day of May, 1963.
~~_~:~ i~ ,.~~~,/~
SECRETAR'Y ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
~tE50i.UTI~N NO. 778 ' '
~ R2-A . • -2-
~' _ .. .... -~~ . `